Logic in Computer Science
See recent articles
Showing new listings for Friday, 10 April 2026
- arXiv:2604.07414 [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: Formally Guaranteed Control Adaptation for ODD-Resilient Autonomous SystemsGricel Vázquez, Calum Imrie, Sepeedeh Shahbeigi, Nawshin Mannan Proma, Tian Gan, Victoria J Hodge, John Molloy, Simos GerasimouSubjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Robotics (cs.RO); Software Engineering (cs.SE); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
Ensuring reliable performance in situations outside the Operational Design Domain (ODD) remains a primary challenge in devising resilient autonomous systems. We explore this challenge by introducing an approach for adapting probabilistic system models to handle out-of-ODD scenarios while, in parallel, providing quantitative guarantees. Our approach dynamically extends the coverage of existing system situation capabilities, supporting the verification and adaptation of the system's behaviour under unanticipated situations. Preliminary results demonstrate that our approach effectively increases system reliability by adapting its behaviour and providing formal guarantees even under unforeseen out-of-ODD situations.
- arXiv:2604.07496 [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: SMT with Uninterpreted Functions and Monotonicity Constraints in Systems BiologyComments: Submitted to SAT 2026 (under review)Subjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
The theory of uninterpreted functions is a key modeling tool for systems with unknown or abstracted components. Some domains such as systems biology impose further restrictions regarding monotonicity on these components, requiring specific inputs to have a consistently positive or negative effect on the output. In this paper, we tackle the model inference problem for biological systems by applying the theory of uninterpreted functions with monotonicity constraints. We compare the performance of naive quantified encodings of the problem and the performance of the existing approach based on eager quantifier instantiation, which is based on the fact that a finite set of quantifier-free monotonicity lemmas is sufficient to encode the monotonicity of uninterpreted functions. Additionally, we consider a lazy variant of the approach that introduces the monotonicity lemmas on demand.
We evaluate the SMT-based approach to model inference using a large collection of systems biology benchmarks. The results demonstrate that the instantiation-based encodings significantly outperform quantified encodings, which typically struggle with large function arities and complex instances. As the key result, we show that our approach based on SMT with uninterpreted functions and monotonicity constraints significantly outperforms state-of-the-art domain-specific tools used in systems biology, such as the ASP-based Bonesis and the BDD-based AEON. - arXiv:2604.07626 [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: When Equality Fails as a Rewrite Principle: Provenance and Definedness for Measurement-Bearing ExpressionsComments: 14 pages; prepared for submission to Logical Methods in Computer ScienceSubjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Programming Languages (cs.PL)
Ordinary algebraic equality is not a sound rewrite principle for measurement-bearing expressions. Reuse of the same observation matters, and division can make algebraically equal forms differ on where they are defined. We present a unified semantics that tracks both provenance and definedness. Token-sensitive enclosure semantics yields judgments for one-way rewriting and interchangeability. An admissible-domain refinement yields a domain-safe rewrite judgment, and support-relative variants connect local and global admissibility. Reduction theorems recover the enclosure-based theory on universally admissible supports. Recovery theorems internalize cancellation, background subtraction, and positive-interval self-division. Strictness theorems show that reachable singularities make simplification one-way and make common-domain equality too weak for licensed replacement. An insufficiency theorem shows that erasing token identity collapses distinctions that definedness alone cannot recover. All definitions and theorems are formalized in sorry-free Lean 4.
- arXiv:2604.07868 [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: On the Decompositionality of Neural NetworksJunyong Lee, Baek-Ryun Seong, Sang-Ki Ko, Andrew Ferraiuolo, Minwoo Kang, Hyuntae Jeon, Seungmin Lim, Jieung KimComments: 28 pages, 9 figuresSubjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Recent advances in deep neural networks have achieved state-of-the-art performance across vision and natural language processing tasks. In practice, however, most models are treated as monolithic black-box functions, limiting maintainability, component-wise optimization, and systematic testing and verification. Despite extensive work on pruning and empirical decomposition, the field still lacks a principled semantic notion of when a neural network can be meaningfully decomposed.
We introduce neural decompositionality, a formal notion defined as a semantic-preserving abstraction over neural architectures. Our key insight is that decompositionality should be characterized by the preservation of semantic behavior along the model's decision boundary, which governs classification outcomes. This yields a semantic contract between the original model and its components, enabling a rigorous formulation of decomposition.
Building on this foundation, we develop a boundary-aware framework, SAVED (Semantic-Aware Verification-Driven Decomposition), which operationalizes the proposed definition. SAVED combines counterexample mining over low logic-margin inputs, probabilistic coverage, and structure-aware pruning to construct decompositions that preserve decision-boundary semantics.
We evaluate our approach on CNNs, language Transformers, and Vision Transformers. Results show clear architectural differences: language Transformers largely preserve boundary semantics under decomposition, whereas vision models frequently violate the decompositionality criterion, indicating intrinsic limits. Overall, our work establishes decompositionality as a formally definable and empirically testable property, providing a foundation for modular reasoning about neural networks.
New submissions (showing 4 of 4 entries)
- arXiv:2604.07353 (cross-list from cs.GL) [pdf, other]
-
Title: Jean-Raymond Abrial: A Scientific Biography of a Formal Methods PioneerComments: 10 pages, 1 figure, submitted to IEEE Annals of the History of ComputingSubjects: General Literature (cs.GL); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Jean-Raymond Abrial is one of the central figures in the development of formal methods for software and systems engineering. Over a career spanning more than five decades, he has played a decisive role in the creation of the Z specification notation, the B-Method, and Event-B, and in demonstrating their applicability to large-scale industrial systems. This paper presents a scholarly biographical account of Abrial's life and work, tracing the evolution of his ideas from early work on real-time languages and databases, through foundational contributions to formal specification, refinement, and proof, to the development of industrial-strength tool support such as the Atelier~B and the Rodin platform. The paper situates Abrial's contributions within their historical, intellectual, and industrial contexts, and assesses their lasting impact on software engineering and formal reasoning about programs.
- arXiv:2604.07455 (cross-list from cs.AI) [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: Munkres' General Topology Autoformalized in Isabelle/HOLSubjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
We describe an experiment in LLM-assisted autoformalization that produced over 85,000 lines of Isabelle/HOL code covering all 39 sections of Munkres' Topology (general topology, Chapters 2--8), from topological spaces through dimension theory. The LLM-based coding agents (initially ChatGPT 5.2 and then Claude Opus 4.6) used 24 active days for that. The formalization is complete: all 806 formal results are fully proved with zero sorry's. Proved results include the Tychonoff theorem, the Baire category theorem, the Nagata--Smirnov and Smirnov metrization theorems, the Stone--Čech compactification, Ascoli's theorem, the space-filling curve, and others. The methodology is based on a "sorry-first" declarative proof workflow combined with bulk use of sledgehammer - two of Isabelle major strengths. This leads to relatively fast autoformalization progress. We analyze the resulting formalization in detail, analyze the human--LLM interaction patterns from the session log, and briefly compare with related autoformalization efforts in Megalodon, HOL Light, and Naproche. The results indicate that LLM-assisted formalization of standard mathematical textbooks in Isabelle/HOL is quite feasible, cheap and fast, even if some human supervision is useful.
- arXiv:2604.07907 (cross-list from cs.AI) [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: Capture-Quiet Decomposition: A Verification Theorem for Chess Endgame TablebasesComments: 9 pages, 3 tables. Validated on 517 endgames covering 6.5 billion positionsSubjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
We present the Capture-Quiet Decomposition (CQD), a structural theorem for verifying Win-Draw-Loss (WDL) labelings of chess endgame tablebases. The theorem decomposes every legal position into exactly one of three categories -- terminal, capture, or quiet -- and shows that a WDL labeling is correct if and only if: (1) terminal positions are labeled correctly, (2) capture positions are consistent with verified sub-models of smaller piece count, and (3) quiet positions satisfy retrograde consistency within the same endgame. The key insight is that capture positions anchor the labeling to externally verified sub-models, breaking the circularity that allows trivial fixpoints (such as the all-draw labeling) to satisfy self-consistency alone. We validate CQD exhaustively on all 35 three- and four-piece endgames (42 million positions), all 110 five-piece endgames, and all 372 six-piece endgames -- 517 endgames in total -- with the decomposed verifier producing identical violation counts to a full retrograde baseline in every case.
- arXiv:2604.08267 (cross-list from math.LO) [pdf, other]
-
Title: Coexact completion of profinite Heyting algebras and uniform interpolationSubjects: Logic (math.LO); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Category Theory (math.CT)
This paper shows that the sheaf representation of finitely presented Heyting algebras constructed by Ghilardi and Zawadowski is, from an algebraic perspective, equivalent to the construction of profinite completion. We show that the dual category of profinite Heyting algebras is an infinitary extensive regular category, and its ex/reg-completion is exactly the aforementioned sheaf topos, which we refer to as the K-topos. We show how certain properties of uniform interpolation can be generalised to the context of arbitrary profinite Heyting algebras, and are consequences of the internal logic of the K-topos. Along the way we also establish various topos-theoretic properties of the K-topos.
- arXiv:2604.08331 (cross-list from math.CT) [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: Metacat: a categorical framework for formal systemsSubjects: Category Theory (math.CT); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
We present a categorical framework for formal systems in which inference rules with $m$ metavariables over a category of syntax $\mathscr{S}$, taken to be a cartesian PROP, are represented by operations of arity $k \to n$ equipped with spans $k \leftarrow m \to n$ in $\mathscr{S}$, encoding the hypotheses and conclusions in a common metavariable context. Composition is by substitution of metavariables, which is the sole primitive operation, as in Metamath.
Proofs in this setting form a symmetric monoidal category whose monoidal structure encodes the combination and reuse of hypotheses. This structure admits a proof-checking algorithm; we provide an open-source implementation together with a surface syntax for defining formal systems. As a demonstration, we encode the formulae and inference rules of first-order logic in Metacat, and give axioms and representative derivations as examples.
Cross submissions (showing 5 of 5 entries)
- arXiv:2505.05306 (replaced) [pdf, other]
-
Title: The calculus of neo-Peircean relationsComments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2401.07055Subjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
The calculus of relations was introduced by De Morgan and Peirce during the second half of the 19th century, as an extension of Boole's algebra of classes. Later developments on quantification theory by Frege and Peirce himself, paved the way to what is known today as first-order logic, causing the calculus of relations to be long forgotten. This was until 1941, when Tarski raised the question on the existence of a complete axiomatisation for it. This question found only negative answers: there is no finite axiomatisation for the calculus of relations and many of its fragments, as shown later by several no-go theorems. In this paper we show that -- by moving from traditional syntax (cartesian) to a diagrammatic one (monoidal) -- it is possible to have complete axiomatisations for the full calculus. The no-go theorems are circumvented by the fact that our calculus, named the calculus of neo-Peircean relations, is more expressive than the calculus of relations and, actually, as expressive as first-order logic. The axioms are obtained by combining two well known categorical structures: cartesian and linear bicategories.
- arXiv:2604.05399 (replaced) [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: PROMISE: Proof Automation as Structural Imitation of Human ReasoningSubjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Automated proof generation for formal software verification remains largely unresolved despite advances in large language models (LLMs). While LLMs perform well in NLP, vision, and code generation, formal verification still requires substantial human effort. Interactive theorem proving (ITP) demands manual proof construction under strict logical constraints, limiting scalability; for example, verifying the seL4 microkernel required decades of effort.
Existing LLM-based approaches attempt to automate this process but remain limited. Most rely on single-shot generation or shallow retrieval, which may work for small proofs but fail to scale to large, interdependent verification tasks with deep structural dependencies.
We present PROMISE (PROof MIning via Structural Embeddings), a structure-aware framework that reframes proof generation as a stateful search over proof-state transitions. Instead of surface-level retrieval, PROMISE mines structural patterns from proof states and tactic transitions, enabling retrieval and adaptation of compatible proof fragments during iterative search.
We evaluate PROMISE on the seL4 benchmark across multiple LLM backends and compare it with prior systems such as Selene and Rango. PROMISE consistently outperforms prior methods, achieving up to +26 point improvements (186% relative gain) while maintaining robustness across models, demonstrating the effectiveness of structure-aware proof mining for scalable theorem proving.