VOOZH about

URL: https://codeberg.org/edestcroix/Recordbox/issues/163

⇱ #163 - some tags are recognised weirdly - edestcroix/Recordbox - Codeberg.org

You've already forked Recordbox
10

some tags are recognised weirdly #163

Open
opened by legacychimera247 · 3 comments
👁 legacychimera247

Hello, i do have some artists that are placed weirdly on the artist list, i'll give you an example

i have a folder with all the doctor who theme songs plus remixes, and they are organized with "Various Artists" as album artist tag, then the author of the song/theme as artist and Doctor Who as album artist sort

in this folder there is also a remix from electronic group Orbital, which is tagged in the same way (Various Artists, Orbital and Doctor Who)

with this, all my orbital records, are showed in Doctor Who, despite being tagged as just orbital in either artist and album artist

if i remove that one single song from them in the doctor who folder they will show up correctly at the O letter

now, there might be other example of this but i cannot be sure about, and that was the most evident as i couldn't find orbital anymore

any hint to solve this?

Hello, i do have some artists that are placed weirdly on the artist list, i'll give you an example i have a folder with all the doctor who theme songs plus remixes, and they are organized with "Various Artists" as album artist tag, then the author of the song/theme as artist and Doctor Who as album artist sort in this folder there is also a remix from electronic group Orbital, which is tagged in the same way (Various Artists, Orbital and Doctor Who) with this, all my orbital records, are showed in Doctor Who, despite being tagged as just orbital in either artist and album artist if i remove that one single song from them in the doctor who folder they will show up correctly at the O letter now, there might be other example of this but i cannot be sure about, and that was the most evident as i couldn't find orbital anymore any hint to solve this?
👁 Emmett de St. Croix
Owner
Copy link

Strange, it's probably another edge case with the database I haven't considered.

I'm going to be pretty busy for the next week or so (bunch of assignments for university due soon) and don't have time to look into this atm, but I'll keep you posted once I have time again.

Strange, it's probably another edge case with the database I haven't considered. I'm going to be pretty busy for the next week or so (bunch of assignments for university due soon) and don't have time to look into this atm, but I'll keep you posted once I have time again.
👁 Emmett de St. Croix
edestcroix added this to the 0.11.0 milestone
👁 Emmett de St. Croix
Owner
Copy link

Okay I've decided going to hold off on debugging this for a bit, because I've been working on redoing the database and it would be easier to test any fixes with that version, so I'm going to wait until 0.10.4 is out and then try to get a dev flatpak repo set up to make it easier for people to download development versions for testing.

That way instead of sending me audio files or me attempting to create some files with the same organization to reproduce issues on my end, people can just download the dev version and test it directly on their library, which I think would be a much easier way of testing things.

Okay I've decided going to hold off on debugging this for a bit, because I've been working on redoing the database and it would be easier to test any fixes with that version, so I'm going to wait until 0.10.4 is out and then try to get a dev flatpak repo set up to make it easier for people to download development versions for testing. That way instead of sending me audio files or me attempting to create some files with the same organization to reproduce issues on my end, people can just download the dev version and test it directly on their library, which I think would be a much easier way of testing things.
👁 Emmett de St. Croix
Owner
Copy link

I've just released a beta for 0.11.0 which made some significant changes to how music is parsed/organized so hopefully it fixes this issue. You can try it by downloading it from the releases page, and let me know if it improves anything. (Or does something else weird instead) If it does work that would be great, but even if not I should be able to debug and fix issues like this much faster now that this beta is out and I've got the new database/library mostly finalized.

I've just released a beta for 0.11.0 which made some significant changes to how music is parsed/organized so hopefully it fixes this issue. You can try it by downloading it from the releases page, and let me know if it improves anything. (Or does something else weird instead) If it does work that would be great, but even if not I should be able to debug and fix issues like this much faster now that this beta is out and I've got the new database/library mostly finalized.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
main
devel
synced-lyrics
carousels
dev-release
v0.11.0
v0.11.0-beta.3
v0.11.0-beta.2
v0.11.0-beta.1
v0.10.4
v0.10.3
v0.10.2
v0.10.1
v0.10.0
v0.9.3
v0.9.2
v0.9.1
v0.9.0
v0.8.3
v0.8.2
v0.8.1
v0.8.0
v0.7.0
v0.6.2
v0.6.1
v0.6.0
0.5.1
0.5.0
v0.4.0
v0.3.1
v0.3.0
v0.3.0-rc1
v0.2.1
v0.2.0
v0.1.0
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Clear projects
No items
No project
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
edestcroix/Recordbox#163
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s(

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?