Abstract
In the commodity bundling literature, pure bundling is ruled out as a uniquely optimal strategy because mixed bundling is always (weakly) better. This paper provides a theoretical distinction between the two pricing schemes. The distinction relies on the degree of consumer heterogeneity in reservation prices. While there is a lack of empirical evidence on commodity bundling pricing schemes due to the difficulties in measuring consumer heterogeneity, we circumvent this problem by examining firm heterogeneity. Specifically, we use data from the newspaper industry in which some two edition newspaper firms are mixed bundlers and others are pure bundlers.
This is a preview of subscription content, to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bundle pricing strategies for two complementary products with different channel powers
Mixed duopoly and the indirect effect in linear supply function competition
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
AdamsW.J. and YellenJ.L. (1976) ‘Commodity Bundling and the Burden of Monopoly’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, 475–498.
McAfeeR. P., McMillanJ. and WhinstonM. D. (1989) ‘Multiproduct Monopoly, Commodity Bundling, and Correlation of Values’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 371–383.
RosseJ. N. (1967) ‘Daily Newspapers, Monopolistic Competition, and Economies of Scale’, American Economic Review, 57, 522–533.
RosseJ. N. (1970) ‘Estimating Cost Function Parameters Without Using Cost Data: An Illustrated Methodology’, Econometrica, 38, 256–275.
VarianH. R. (1989) ‘Price Discrimination’, in SchmalenseeR. and WilligR. D. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Winter, H. (1991) The Economics of Newspaper Competition. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Rochester.
Additional information
We are grateful to William Neilson for providing us with several helpful insights. We also benefitted from comments by Tony Caporale, Donald Deere, James Griffin, Kristin McCue, and Curtis Taylor. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the BLS or any other agency of the US Department of Labor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pierce, B., Winter, H. Pure vs. mixed commodity bundling. Rev Ind Organ 11, 811–821 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174408
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174408
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
