VOOZH about

URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00984104?error=cookies_not_supported&code=bda5d830-2655-4958-98f3-33b644797799

⇱ Pollen morphological evolution in bat pollinated plants | Plant Systematics and Evolution | Springer Nature Link


Skip to main content

Pollen morphological evolution in bat pollinated plants

  • Published:

Abstract

This study assesses to what extent bat pollination has acted as a selective force on pollen morphology. Earlier pollen studies have suggested convergent evolution of verrucate exine ornamentation. Furthermore pollen of bat pollinated plants has been reported to be bigger than that of plants pollinated by other means. The generality of these ideas is tested using a sample of 130 species of both bat pollinated plants and relatives with another mode of pollination. An analysis of pollen size, shape, aperture number and type, and ornamentation type of 35 plant groups in which a transition towards bat pollination occurred was performed and showed a significant effect for pollen size only. Bat pollinated plants have bigger pollen than their relatives. Pollen size was shown to correlate with style length. Pollen shape, aperture system and exine ornamentation are in general not very different in bat pollinated plants in comparison with their relatives. There is no consistent trend for rougher exines to be associated with bat pollination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Barth O. M. (1966) Estudos morfologicos dos polens en Caryocaraceae. Rodriguesia 25(37): 351–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum D., Small R. L., Wendel J. F. (1998) Biogeography and floral evolution of Baobabs (Adansonia, Bombacaceae) as inferred from multiple data sets. Syst. Biol. 47: 181–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buurman J. (1977) Contribution to the pollenmorphology of the Bignoniaceae, with special reference to the tricolpate type. Pollen et Spores XIX (4): 447–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaloner W. G. (1986) Electrostatic forces in insect pollination and their significance in exine ornament. In: Blackmore S., Ferguson I. K. (eds.) Pollen and spores, form and function. Linn. Soc. Symp. Ser. 12: 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez R. P. (1974) Observaciones en el polen de plantas con probable polinizacion quiropterofila. Anal. Escuela. nac. Cienc. biol. Mexico 21: 115–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox P. A., Cromar S., Jarvis T. (1991) Underwater pollination, three-dimensional search, and pollen morphology: predictions from a supercomputer analysis. In: Blackmore S., Barnes S. H. (eds.) Pollen and Spores Patterns of Diversification. Systematics Assoc. Special vol. 44: 363–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane P. R. (1986) Form and function in wind dispersed pollen. In: Blackmore S., Ferguson I. K. (eds.) Pollen and Spores Form and Function. Academic Press, London, pp. 179–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobat K., Peikert-Holle T. (1985) BlΓΌten und FledermΓ€use. Waldemar Kramer, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faegri K., Van der Pijl, L. (1979) The principles of pollination biology. Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J. (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson I. K. (1984) Pollen morphology and biosystematics of the subfamily Papilionoideae (Leguminosae). In: Grant W. F. (ed.) Plant Biosystematics. Academic Press, Canada, pp. 377–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson I. K. (1985) The role of pollen morphology in plant systematics. An. Asoc. Palinol. Leng. Esp. 2: 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson I. K. (1990) Significance of some pollen morphological characters of the tribe Amorpheae and the genusMucuna (tribe Phaseoleae) in the biology and the systematics of the subfamily Papilionoideae (Leguminosae). Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 64: 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson I. K., Pearce K. J. (1986) Observations on the pollen morphology of the genusBauhinia L. (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) in the neotropics. In: Blackmore S., Ferguson I. K. (eds.) Pollen and Spores Form and Function. Academic Press, London, pp. 283–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson I. K., Santisuk T. (1973) Notes on the pollen morphology of some asiatic Bignoniaceae. Kew Bull. 28(2): 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson I. K., Skvarla J. J. (1982) Pollen morphology in relation to pollinators in Papilionoideae (Leguminosae). Bot. J. Lin. Soc. 84: 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham A., Barker G., Da Silva M. F. (1980) Unique pollen types in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae). Grana 19: 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham A., Barker G. (1981) Palynology and Tribal Classification in the Caesalpinioideae. In: Polhill R. M., Raven P. H. (eds.) Advances in Legume Systematics Part 2. Royal Botanic gardens, Kew, pp. 801–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham A., Graham S. A., Nowicke J. W., Patel V., Lee S. (1990) Palynology and systematics of the Lythraceae. III. generaPhysocalymma through Woodfordia, adenda, and conclusions. Amer. J. Bot. 77(2): 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayum M. H. (1986) Correlations between pollination biology and pollen morphology in the Araceae, with some implications for angiosperm evolution. In: Blackmore S., Ferguson I. K. (eds.) Pollen and Spores Form and Function. Academic Press, London, pp. 313–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey P. H., Pagel M. D. (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemsley A. R., Jenkins P. D., Collinson M. E., Vincent B. (1996) Experimental modelling of exine self-assembly. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 121: 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera C. M. (1996) Floral traits and plant adaptation to insect pollinators: a devil's advocate approach. In: Lloyd D. G., Barrett S. C. H. (eds.) Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 65–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klitgaard B. B., Ferguson I. K. (1992) Pollen morphology ofBrowneopsis (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae), and its evolutionary significance. Grana 31: 285–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress W. J. (1986) Exineless pollen structure and pollination systems of tropicalHeliconia (Heliconiaceae). In: Blackmore S., Ferguson I. K. (eds.) Pollen and Spores Form and Function. Academic Press, London, pp. 329–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder H. P. (1998) Morphology and the evolution of wind pollination. In: Owens S. J., Rudall P. J. (eds.) Reproductive Biology. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori S. A., Orchard J. E., Prance G. T. (1980) Intrafloral pollen differentiation in the New World Lecythidaceae, Subfamily Lecythidoidea. Science 209(4454): 400–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller J. (1979) Form and Function in angiosperm pollen. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 66: 593–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller J. (1981) Exine architecture and function in some Lythraceae and Sonneratiaceae. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 35: 93–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson S., Robyns A. (1986) Bombacaceae. World Pollen and Spore Flora 20.

  • Osborn J. M., Taylor T. N., Schneider E. L. (1991) Pollen morphology and ultrastructure of the Cabombaceae: correlations with pollination biology. Am. J. Bot. 78(10): 1367–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prance G. T., Freitas da Silva M. (1973) Caryocaraceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph No. 12. Hafner Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punt W., Blackmore S., Nilsson S., le Thomas A. (1994) Glossary of Pollen and Spore Terminology. LPP Contributions Series 1, LPP Foundation, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal R. R., Rolf F. J. (1995) Biometry. 3rd edn. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins G. L. (1970) Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms. I. Pollination mechanisms. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1: 307–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone D. E., Sellers S. C., Kress W. J. (1979) Ontogeny of exineless pollen inHeliconia, a banana relative. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 66: 701–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor T. N., Levin D. A. (1975) Pollen morphology of Polemoniaceae in relation to systematics and pollination systems: scanning electron microscopy. Grana 15:91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsou C. H. (1994) The embryology, reproductive morphology, and systematics of Lecythidaceae. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 71: 1–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uffelen G. (1991) The control of spore wall formation. In: Blackmore S., Barnes S. H. (eds.) Pollen and Spores Patterns of Diversification. Systematics Assoc. Special vol. 44: 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodehouse R. P. (1935) Pollen grains, their structure, identification and significance in science and Medicine. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leiden Branch, National Herbarium of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 9514, NL-2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands

    A. Stroo

Authors
  1. A. Stroo

About this article

Cite this article

Stroo, A. Pollen morphological evolution in bat pollinated plants. Pl Syst Evol 222, 225–242 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984104

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984104

Key words