Card shuffling and a transformation on S n
- Research Papers
- Published:
- Volume 44, pages 11–34, (1992)
- Cite this article
Summary
We consider two card shuffling schemes. The first, which has appeared in the literature previously ([G], [RB], [T]), is as follows: start with a deck ofn cards, and pick a random tuplet ∈ { 1, 2, ⋯, n} n; interchange cards 1 andt 1, then interchange cards 2 andt 2, etc. The second scheme, which can be viewed as a transformation on the symmetric groupS n , is given by the restriction of the former shuffling scheme to tuplest which form a permutation of {1, 2,⋯,n}.
We determine the bias of each of these shuffling schemes with respect to the sets of transpositions and derangements, and the expected number of fixed points of a permutation generated by each of these shuffling schemes. For the latter scheme we prove combinatorially that the permutation which arises with the highest probability is the identity. The same question is open for the former scheme. We refute a candidate answer suggested by numerical evidence [RB].
This is a preview of subscription content, to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Generalised shuffle groups
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Aldous, D. andDiaconis, P.,Shuffling cards and stopping times, Amer. Math. Monthyl93, (1986), 333–348.
Comtet, L., “Advanced Combinatorics”, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1974.
Dénès, J.,The representation of a permutation as the product of a minimal number of transpositions, and its connection with the theory of graphs, Math. Inst. Hungarian Acad. Sci.4, (1959), 63–70.
Diaconis, P.,Application of the method of moments in probability and statistics, Proc. Symp. Appl. Math.37 (1987), 125–142.
Diaconis, P. andShahshahani, M.,Generating a random permutation with random transpositions, Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Gebiete57 (1981), 159–179.
Grossman, J. W.,Problem E 2645, Amer. Math. Monthly84 (1977), 217.
Harary, F. andPalmer, E., “Graphical Enumeration”, Academic Press, 1973.
Katz, L.,Probability of indecomposability of a random mapping function, Annals of Math. Stat.26 (1955), 512–517.
Marsden, J. andHoffman, M., “Basic Complex Analysis”, second edition, W. H. Freeman Co., 1987.
Pólya, G. andSzegö, G., “Problems and Theorems in Analysis”, vol. 1, Springer-Verlag, 1972.
Robbins, D. P. andBolker, E. D.,The bias of three pseudo-random shuffles, Aequationes Math.22 (1981), 268–292.
Thorp, E. O.,Problem E 1763, Amer. Math. Monthly73 (1966), 417.
Additional information
This work was carried out in part while R.S. was visiting the Institute for Mathematics and its Applications and was partly supported through NSF Grant CCR-8707539.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt, F., Simion, R. Card shuffling and a transformation on S n . Aeq. Math. 44, 11–34 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01834201
Received:
Accepted:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01834201
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
