Social desirability, anonymity, and internet-based questionnaires
- Published:
- Volume 31, pages 433β438 (1999)
- Cite this article
Abstract
It has been argued that behavior on the Internet differs from similar behavior in the βreal worldβ (Joinson, 1998a). In the present study, participants completed measures of self-consciousness, social anxiety, self-esteem, and social desirability, using either the World-Wide Web (WWW) or pen and paper, and were assigned to either an anonymous or a nonanonymous condition. It was found that people reported lower social anxiety and social desirability and higher self-esteem when they were anonymous than when they were nonanonymous. Furthermore, participants also reported lower social anxiety and social desirability when they were using the Internet than when they were using paper-based methods. Contrast analyses supported the prediction that participants using the WWW anonymously would show the lowest levels of social desirability, whereas participants answering with pen and paper nonanonymously would score highest on the same measure. Implications for the use of the Internet for the collection of psychological data are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Does social anxiety look the same in the online and offline world?
Applications of Internet Methods in Psychology
Antisocial Behaviour Analyses Using Deep Learning
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Bride, M. (1996).Teach yourself the Internet. London: Hodder Headline.
Buchanan, T., &Smith, J. L. (1999). Using the Internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World-Wide Web.British Journal of Psychology,90, 125β144.
Carver, C. S., &Scheier, M. F. (1981).Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
Crowne, D. P., &Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.Journal of Consulting Psychology,24, 349β354.
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., &Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory.Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology,43, 522β527.
Greist, J. H., Klein, M. H., &Van Cura, L. J. (1973). A computer interview by psychiatric patient target symptoms.Archives of General Psychiatry,29, 247β253.
Hansen, N. E., &Gladfelter, J. (1996). Teaching graduate psychology seminars using electronic mail: Creative distance education.Teaching of Psychology,23, 252β256.
Joinson, A. N. (1998a). Causes and implications of disinhibited behavior on the Net. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.),Psychology of the Internet (pp. 43β60). New York: Academic Press.
Joinson, A. N. (1998b). Social psychological applications of educational simulation. In J. Rolfe, D. Saunders, & T. Powell (Eds.),Simulation and gaming research yearbook (Vol. 6, pp. 155β160). London: Kogan Page.
Joinson, A. N., &Harris, P. R. (1995).Self-enhancement and selfprotection on the Internet: A study of football fans on the WWW. Paper presented at the BPS London Conference, Institute of Education, London.
Kiesler, S., Siegal, J., &McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer mediated communication.American Psychologist,39, 1123β1134.
Krantz, J. H., Ballard, J., &Scher, J. (1997). Comparing the results of laboratory and World-Wide Web samples on the determinants of female attractiveness.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,29, 264β269.
Lea, M., &Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation and group decision making.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies,39, 283β301.
Locke, S. D., &Gilbert, B. O. (1995). Method of psychological assessment, self-disclosure, and experimental differences: A study of computer, questionnaire and interview assessment formats.Journal of Social Behavior & Personality,10, 255β263.
Matheson, K., &Zanna, M. P. (1988). The impact of computermediated communication on self-awareness.Computers in Human Behavior,4, 221β233.
MIDS (1996).Matrix Information and Directory Services 3rd Internet Survey. Downloaded June 1997 from http://www3.mids.org/mn/601/ demo9510.html
Parks, M. R., &Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in Cyberspace.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,1. Downloaded June 1997 from http://jmc.huji.ac.il/vol1/issue4/parks.html
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.),Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17β59). New York: Academic Press.
Prentice-Dunn, S., &Rogers, R.W. (1982). Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,43, 503β513.
Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., &Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.),European review of social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 161β198). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Rosenberg, M. (1979).Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
Rosenthal, R., &Rosnow, R. L. (1985).Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Short, J. A., Williams, E., &Christie, B. (1976).The social psychology of telecommunication. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Stern, S. E., &Faber, J. E. (1997). The lost e-mail method: Milgramβs lost-letter technique in the age of the Internet.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,29, 260β263.
Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order vs. deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.),Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 237β307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Additional information
The author thanks Jo Trivette for her help in the collection of data and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joinson, A. Social desirability, anonymity, and internet-based questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31, 433β438 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200723
Received:
Accepted:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200723
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Keywords
Profiles
- Adam Joinson View author profile
