VOOZH about

URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03200723?error=cookies_not_supported&code=47e6d1cc-7f77-430d-9ff3-04b58becb68f

⇱ Social desirability, anonymity, and internet-based questionnaires | Behavior Research Methods | Springer Nature Link


Skip to main content

Social desirability, anonymity, and internet-based questionnaires

  • Published:

Abstract

It has been argued that behavior on the Internet differs from similar behavior in the β€œreal world” (Joinson, 1998a). In the present study, participants completed measures of self-consciousness, social anxiety, self-esteem, and social desirability, using either the World-Wide Web (WWW) or pen and paper, and were assigned to either an anonymous or a nonanonymous condition. It was found that people reported lower social anxiety and social desirability and higher self-esteem when they were anonymous than when they were nonanonymous. Furthermore, participants also reported lower social anxiety and social desirability when they were using the Internet than when they were using paper-based methods. Contrast analyses supported the prediction that participants using the WWW anonymously would show the lowest levels of social desirability, whereas participants answering with pen and paper nonanonymously would score highest on the same measure. Implications for the use of the Internet for the collection of psychological data are discussed.

Article PDF

Similar content being viewed by others

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Bride, M. (1996).Teach yourself the Internet. London: Hodder Headline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, T., &Smith, J. L. (1999). Using the Internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World-Wide Web.British Journal of Psychology,90, 125–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., &Scheier, M. F. (1981).Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., &Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.Journal of Consulting Psychology,24, 349–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., &Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory.Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology,43, 522–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greist, J. H., Klein, M. H., &Van Cura, L. J. (1973). A computer interview by psychiatric patient target symptoms.Archives of General Psychiatry,29, 247–253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, N. E., &Gladfelter, J. (1996). Teaching graduate psychology seminars using electronic mail: Creative distance education.Teaching of Psychology,23, 252–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A. N. (1998a). Causes and implications of disinhibited behavior on the Net. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.),Psychology of the Internet (pp. 43–60). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A. N. (1998b). Social psychological applications of educational simulation. In J. Rolfe, D. Saunders, & T. Powell (Eds.),Simulation and gaming research yearbook (Vol. 6, pp. 155–160). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A. N., &Harris, P. R. (1995).Self-enhancement and selfprotection on the Internet: A study of football fans on the WWW. Paper presented at the BPS London Conference, Institute of Education, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, S., Siegal, J., &McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer mediated communication.American Psychologist,39, 1123–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, J. H., Ballard, J., &Scher, J. (1997). Comparing the results of laboratory and World-Wide Web samples on the determinants of female attractiveness.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,29, 264–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M., &Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation and group decision making.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies,39, 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, S. D., &Gilbert, B. O. (1995). Method of psychological assessment, self-disclosure, and experimental differences: A study of computer, questionnaire and interview assessment formats.Journal of Social Behavior & Personality,10, 255–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheson, K., &Zanna, M. P. (1988). The impact of computermediated communication on self-awareness.Computers in Human Behavior,4, 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MIDS (1996).Matrix Information and Directory Services 3rd Internet Survey. Downloaded June 1997 from http://www3.mids.org/mn/601/ demo9510.html

  • Parks, M. R., &Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in Cyberspace.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,1. Downloaded June 1997 from http://jmc.huji.ac.il/vol1/issue4/parks.html

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.),Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice-Dunn, S., &Rogers, R.W. (1982). Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,43, 503–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., &Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.),European review of social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 161–198). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1979).Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., &Rosnow, R. L. (1985).Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. A., Williams, E., &Christie, B. (1976).The social psychology of telecommunication. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, S. E., &Faber, J. E. (1997). The lost e-mail method: Milgram’s lost-letter technique in the age of the Internet.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,29, 260–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order vs. deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.),Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 237–307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Humanities and Social Science, University of Glamorgan, CF37 1DL, Pontypridd, Mid-Glamorgan, Wales

    Adam Joinson

Authors
  1. Adam Joinson

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Joinson.

Additional information

The author thanks Jo Trivette for her help in the collection of data and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.

About this article

Cite this article

Joinson, A. Social desirability, anonymity, and internet-based questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31, 433–438 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200723

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200723

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Adam Joinson View author profile