VOOZH about

URL: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks:PROJECTS

⇱ Wikibooks:Reading room/Projects - Wikibooks, open books for an open world


Jump to content
From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
(Redirected from Wikibooks:PROJECTS)
Latest comment: 3 days ago by Kittycataclysm in topic Wikinews
👁 Image
Archives
Wikibooks Discussion Rooms
Discussions Assistance Requests
General | Proposals | | Featured books Administrative | Technical Deletion | Undeletion | Import | Upload | Permissions


Welcome to the Projects reading room. On this page, Wikibookians can talk about subjects related to books, book projects, and other tasks here on Wikibooks that require discussion and organization.


I can donate a book on software architecture

[edit | edit source]
Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello,

I wrote a compendium of architectural patterns and can donate it to Wikibooks. However, it contains hundreds of diagrams and probably above a thousand of cross-links, therefore it will take a lot of effort to translate it into the Wikibooks' web layout without some automation. I am too lazy to do that on my own. Moreover, the book is based in original research, which is not welcome here, as far as I know.

Please see if you want to accept the book and if you have volunteers to input it. I can provide access to the original Google Doc and LucidChart diagrams. Descri (discusscontribs) 16:15, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Strange mix of "completeness" markers on one book

[edit | edit source]
Latest comment: 5 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello!

So I was just pressing random book and found this one https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikijunior:Human_Body which is strange. I can find there \{\{Book is finished\}\} and \{\{status|25%\}\} on the same page. Idk what to consider finished but it seems it applies \{\{status|100%\}\}? But there is 25% too? Does "book is finished" applies some additional/alternative semantic from what I expect?

EDIT: this should belong to one of "... assistance reading room"? Seems too late though... DustDFG (discusscontribs) 16:48, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

The banner reading "This book is finished" displays because {{Book is finished}} is at the beginning of the page Wikijunior:Human Body. You can also see a small legend in the center of the page breaking down completeness levels because {{Stages}} is present on this page. Finally, you will see a small box at the top right which indicates that the page is 25% done because toward the bottom of the page, there is {{status}} and it's rated {{status|25%}}. I think what's implicit here is that these seem to contradict each other and you're correct about that. If you're wondering how to harmonize these, I'd recommend removing {{Book is finished}}. You'll also see that several of the subpages in this book are rated 25% and 50% and many of pages that have no rating are barely started, such as Wikijunior:Human Body/Nose. I would definitely not call this "finished". —Justin (koavf)TCM 18:08, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Wikinews

[edit | edit source]
Latest comment: 3 days ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, as Wikinews was moving to closure in a month, I am wondering if you wanted to open a new "book" for news following Wikinews workflows: there are some style and content requirements, a peer review process. And, a few days after an article is published, it becomes archived and is no longer editable. Then migration off-site to e.g. Miraheze can be avoided. This was not discussed in Wikinews internally, but I am wondering if this site would be open to such an addition. Gryllida 09:38, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Links: content guide, style guide, home page. Reviewers would need to apply for flagged revs permissions. Gryllida 09:40, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
Note it was about all language editions, so some way for users to write in multiple languages would be needed. Gryllida 09:41, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
@Gryllida Thank you for letting us know! I think it would take a large community discussion to decide on something like this for a few reasons:
  • News violates established Wikibooks policies (see WB:NEWS).
  • News wouldn't fit neatly into our current content structuring, which is optimized for a different kind of content.
I'll let other people chime in here, but it seems on first glance like it would be a big sell. Cheers —Kittycataclysm (discusscontribs) 19:23, 1 April 2026 (UTC)