VOOZH about

URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Zhomov

⇱ Aleksandr Zhomov - Wikipedia


Jump to content
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Soviet and Russian counterintelligence officer (born c. 1954)
Aleksandr Zhomov
Native name
Александр Васильевич Жомов
Bornc. 1954
Allegiance👁 Image
Soviet Union (to 1991)
👁 Image
Russia
Branch
KGB (Second Chief Directorate)
FSB
Rank
Colonel general
Known forKGB double-agent operation against the CIA (GTPROLOGUE); chief of the FSB Department for Counterintelligence Operations (DKRO)

Aleksandr Vasilyevich Zhomov (Russian: Александр Васильевич Жомов; born c. 1954), known as "Sasha", is a Soviet and Russian counterintelligence officer. As a KGB officer in 1987 he was dispatched as a dangle against the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) station in Moscow, posing for three years as a volunteer source under the CIA cryptonym GTPROLOGUE while feeding the agency disinformation designed to conceal its penetration by Aldrich Ames.[1] He later served in the Federal Security Service (FSB), where he led the Department for Counterintelligence Operations (DKRO), the unit responsible for working against American personnel in Russia, and reached the rank of colonel general.[1][2]

KGB career

[edit]

Zhomov joined the KGB around 1977 and served in the First (American) Department of the Second Chief Directorate (SCD), which conducted counterintelligence against Americans in Moscow. By the mid-1980s he supervised the surveillance teams assigned to follow CIA officers in the city on a daily basis, and also described himself as executive assistant to the department chief, Valentin Klimenko. He spoke near-native English.[1]

GTPROLOGUE

[edit]

Background

[edit]

In June 1985 Aldrich Ames, a counterintelligence officer in the CIA's Soviet and East European (SE) Division, sold the KGB the identities of more than a dozen Soviet agents working for the United States. The arrests that followed through 1985 and 1986 left the CIA searching for the cause of what became known internally as the "'85-86 losses". To protect Ames, the KGB ran a disinformation campaign from at least 1986 offering alternative explanations: that Moscow station had been technically penetrated, or that the SCD's surveillance skill, helped by poor CIA tradecraft, had exposed the agents.[1]

In December 1986 Klimenko, on instruction from either SCD chief Rem Krassilnikov or KGB chairman Viktor Chebrikov, directed Zhomov to prepare an operation against the CIA station. The choice broke an unwritten rule that both the CIA and FBI believed the KGB observed: staff officers were not used as dangles, because of the risk they might genuinely defect. Within the SE Division this assumption had hardened into an informal doctrine after a 1971 internal study, and the KGB, possibly coached by Ames on the division's thinking, exploited it.[1][3]

Contact and handling

[edit]
👁 Image
The Red Arrow express between Moscow and Leningrad, where Zhomov first approached the CIA station chief

In May 1987 Zhomov approached Jack Downing, the CIA station chief in Moscow, in the last carriage of the Red Arrow overnight train to Leningrad, which Downing rode regularly. Introducing himself in a note as "Edwin", he passed recent KGB surveillance photographs of Downing and his wife, an outline of his own position, an account of his motives (frustration with the Soviet system and a failing marriage, and a wish to resettle in the United States), and a communications plan of his own design. Contact would run through letter drops: on Friday evenings Downing was to leave his car unlocked outside designated restaurants and cinemas, where Zhomov, under cover of his official duty to search the station chief's briefcase, would exchange documents.[1][4]

The SE Division assigned the cryptonym GTPROLOGUE and decided, despite internal doubts, to run the case. Division chief Burton Gerber and his deputy Paul Redmond reasoned that a genuine volunteer would be valuable, while a dangle's reporting would at least indicate what the KGB wanted the CIA to believe.[1] Zhomov's early production appeared to validate him: he forewarned an SCD campaign of false volunteers against Moscow station, and the predicted dangles duly appeared from July 1987. He then delivered a complete and accurate list of the CIA sources arrested in 1985 and 1986, attributing every loss to SCD surveillance and CIA tradecraft errors rather than to a mole. Running the false volunteers he had "exposed", which the station continued in order to protect him, consumed much of its resources. The CIA paid him a substantial but unconfirmed amount.[1][3]

Exposure

[edit]

Doubts accumulated. Zhomov's answers to test questions were vague, he claimed unusually limited access for an officer of his position, and he held back his most sensitive material for a promised debriefing in America while never pressing for a date of escape. In November 1989 the defector Sergey Papushin, a former SCD officer, identified him from a photograph and contradicted his cover story, describing a happily married colleague rather than a man with a failing marriage.[1] To settle the question, the CIA offered exfiltration: Zhomov accepted, supplied photographs for an altered US passport, and was to cross from Estonia to Helsinki by ferry in July 1990. He never appeared. A final note, passed aboard the Red Arrow to the wife of the new station chief, blamed the documents and promised future contact, after which Zhomov appeared openly among the KGB surveillance team trailing the couple in Leningrad. The SE Division concluded he had been under KGB control throughout.[1][5]

Ames, who was not on the small list of officers cleared for the case, independently warned the KGB of GTPROLOGUE's existence during 1990 and was reassured by his handlers that the source would not betray him.[1] CIA counterintelligence did not begin to focus on Ames until late 1989, and he was arrested only in 1994.[1]

Russian account

[edit]

Klimenko, who retired from the FSB as a lieutenant general, described the case from the Soviet side in a 2018 memoir, presenting it as a deliberate operational game, known in Russian accounts as Operation Fantom, that he ran with Zhomov under the agent name "Edwin" and with the knowledge of only a handful of officials. His account differs from American reconstructions on points of detail, including the date and train of the first approach to Downing. It also describes a meeting between Zhomov and a CIA officer over a chess game and a hand-written sticker left on the station chief's apartment door to restore broken contact.[6][1]

FSB career

[edit]
👁 Image
The Lubyanka building in Moscow, headquarters of the FSB

Zhomov remained in the First Department through its transition into the FSB's American department and its successor, the Department for Counterintelligence Operations (DKRO) within the FSB's First Service. He took part in the arrest of Aleksandr Zaporozhsky, the SVR counterintelligence officer who had assisted the American identification of Ames and who received an 18-year sentence, served as the FSB's liaison to the CIA in Moscow, and was involved in the 2010 spy exchange in Vienna, in which Zaporozhsky was among those released to the United States.[1][2]

For a period between about 2010 and at least 2019, Zhomov headed DKRO, eventually holding the rank of colonel general.[1] The Insider, citing leaked DKRO documents, reported that in that role he directed the surveillance of an American Drug Enforcement Administration official in Moscow whom the Kremlin considered exchanging for the imprisoned arms dealer Viktor Bout, and described Zhomov as known in the service as a master of operational set-ups.[2] DKRO later attracted international attention for its part in the arrests of American citizens in Russia, including the journalist Evan Gershkovich in 2023; by 2024 the department was reported to be led by Lieutenant General Dmitry Minaev.[7]

Assessment

[edit]

The 2025 CIA historical study of the case judged the dangling of Zhomov a largely successful offensive counterintelligence operation. It credited him with revealing CIA denied-area tradecraft including an exfiltration route, assessing station chiefs, serving as a deception channel on the 1985-86 losses, tying down Moscow station in the handling of false volunteers, and taking CIA money, while noting that his reporting never persuaded the agency to abandon the possibility of a mole. The study found that the KGB's principal weakness was the thinness of his stated motives, which the defector Papushin's reporting undermined.[1] Bearden and Risen, in their 2003 history of the period, treated the case as part of the unresolved aftermath of the 1985 losses; the KGB used a staff officer as a dangle in no other known case.[4][8]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Orleans, Alexander (June 2025). "Beautiful in Another Context: A Counterintelligence Assessment of GTPROLOGUE". Studies in Intelligence. 69 (2). Central Intelligence Agency.
  2. ^ a b c "Поймать и обменять. Как ФСБ охотится за заложниками-иностранцами". The Insider (in Russian). 12 April 2023.
  3. ^ a b Fischer, Benjamin B. (2016). "Doubles Troubles: The CIA and Double Agents during the Cold War". International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence. 29 (1): 48–74. doi:10.1080/08850607.2015.1083313.
  4. ^ a b Stein, Jeff (27 July 2003). "Spy vs. Spy". The New York Times.
  5. ^ Wise, David (1 June 2003). "Of moles and men". Los Angeles Times.
  6. ^ Klimenko, Valentin (2018). Записки контрразведчика. Взгляд изнутри на противоборство КГБ и ЦРУ, и не только [Notes of a Counterintelligence Officer] (in Russian). Moscow.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  7. ^ "Secretive FSB Unit Steers Russia's Sweeping Wartime Spy Crackdown – WSJ". The Moscow Times. 13 December 2024.
  8. ^ Bearden, Milt; Risen, James (2003). The Main Enemy: The Inside Story of the CIA's Final Showdown with the KGB. New York: Random House. ISBN 0-679-46309-7.