| Allen v. Cooper | |
|---|---|
| 👁 Image | |
| Decided March 23, 2020 | |
| Full case name | Allen v. Cooper |
| Citations | 589 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| Congress did not have the authority to abrogate the states' sovereign immunity from copyright infringement suits in the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act of 1990. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Kagan, joined by Roberts, Alito, Sotomayor, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh; Thomas (in part) |
| Concurrence | Thomas (in part) |
| Concurrence | Breyer (in judgment), joined by Ginsburg |
Allen v. Cooper, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that congress did not have the authority to abrogate the states' sovereign immunity from copyright infringement suits in the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act of 1990.[1][2]
Background
[edit]In 1996, a marine salvage company named Intersal, Inc., discovered the shipwreck of the Queen Anne's Revenge off the North Carolina coast. North Carolina, the shipwreck's legal owner, contracted with Intersal to conduct recovery operations. Intersal, in turn, hired videographer Frederick Allen to document the efforts. Allen recorded videos and took photos of the recovery for more than a decade. He registered copyrights in all of his works. When North Carolina published some of Allen's videos and photos online, Allen sued for copyright infringement. North Carolina moved to dismiss the lawsuit on the ground of state sovereign immunity. Allen countered that the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act of 1990 (CRCA) removed the States' sovereign immunity in copyright infringement cases. The federal District Court agreed with Allen, finding in the CRCA's text a clear congressional intent to abrogate state sovereign immunity and a proper constitutional basis for that abrogation. The court acknowledged that the Supreme Court case Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Ed. Expense Bd. v. College Savings Bank precluded Congress from using its Article I powers—including its authority over copyrights—to deprive States of sovereign immunity. Nonetheless, the court held that Congress could accomplish its objective under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, reading Florida Prepaid to prevent recourse to both Article I and Section 5.
Opinion of the court
[edit]| 👁 [icon] | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding missing information. (January 2026) |
The Supreme Court issued an opinion on March 23, 2020.[1]
Later developments
[edit]| 👁 [icon] | This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (January 2026) |
References
[edit]External links
[edit]This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.
- United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court stubs
- March 2020 in the United States
- United States Supreme Court cases in 2020
- United States Supreme Court cases
- United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
- United States copyright case law
- United States sovereign immunity case law
- United States Fourteenth Amendment, section five case law
- Use American English from January 2026
- All Wikipedia articles written in American English
- Use mdy dates from January 2026
- Articles with short description
- Short description matches Wikidata
- Articles to be expanded from January 2026
- All articles to be expanded
- Articles with empty sections from January 2026
- All articles with empty sections
- Wikipedia articles incorporating text from public domain works of the United States Government
- All stub articles
