VOOZH about

URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elasticity_tensor

⇱ Elasticity tensor - Wikipedia


Jump to content
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stress-strain relation in a linear elastic material

The elasticity tensor is a fourth-rank tensor describing the stress-strain relation in a linear elastic material.[1][2] Other names are elastic modulus tensor and stiffness tensor. Common symbols include πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {C} }
and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {Y} }
.

The defining equation can be written as

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle T^{ij}=C^{ijkl}E_{kl}}

where πŸ‘ {\displaystyle T^{ij}}
and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle E_{kl}}
are the components of the Cauchy stress tensor and infinitesimal strain tensor, and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle C^{ijkl}}
are the components of the elasticity tensor. Summation over repeated indices is implied.[note 1] This relationship can be interpreted as a generalization of Hooke's law to a 3D continuum.

A general fourth-rank tensor πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {F} }
in 3D has 34 = 81 independent components πŸ‘ {\displaystyle F_{ijkl}}
, but the elasticity tensor has at most 21 independent components.[3] This fact follows from the symmetry of the stress and strain tensors, together with the requirement that the stress derives from an elastic energy potential. For isotropic materials, the elasticity tensor has just two independent components, which can be chosen to be the bulk modulus and shear modulus.[3]

Definition

[edit]

The most general linear relation between two second-rank tensors πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {T} ,\mathbf {E} }
is

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle T^{ij}=C^{ijkl}E_{kl}}

where πŸ‘ {\displaystyle C^{ijkl}}
are the components of a fourth-rank tensor πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {C} }
.[1][note 1] The elasticity tensor is defined as πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {C} }
for the case where πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {T} }
and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {E} }
are the stress and strain tensors, respectively.

The compliance tensor πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {K} }
is defined from the inverse stress-strain relation:

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle E^{ij}=K^{ijkl}T_{kl}}

The two are related by

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle K_{ijpq}C^{pqkl}={\frac {1}{2}}\left(\delta _{i}^{k}\delta _{j}^{l}+\delta _{i}^{l}\delta _{j}^{k}\right)}

where πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \delta _{n}^{m}}
is the Kronecker delta.[4][5][note 2]

Unless otherwise noted, this article assumes πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {C} }
is defined from the stress-strain relation of a linear elastic material, in the limit of small strain.

Special cases

[edit]

Isotropic

[edit]

For an isotropic material, πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {C} }
simplifies to

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle C^{ijkl}=\lambda \!\left(X\right)g^{ij}g^{kl}+\mu \!\left(X\right)\left(g^{ik}g^{jl}+g^{il}g^{kj}\right)}

where πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \lambda }
and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mu }
are scalar functions of the material coordinates πŸ‘ {\displaystyle X}
, and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {g} }
is the metric tensor in the reference frame of the material.[6][7] In an orthonormal Cartesian coordinate basis, there is no distinction between upper and lower indices, and the metric tensor can be replaced with the Kronecker delta:

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle C_{ijkl}=\lambda \!\left(X\right)\delta _{ij}\delta _{kl}+\mu \!\left(X\right)\left(\delta _{ik}\delta _{jl}+\delta _{il}\delta _{kj}\right)\quad {\text{[Cartesian coordinates]}}}

Substituting the first equation into the stress-strain relation and summing over repeated indices gives

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle T^{ij}=\lambda \!\left(X\right)\cdot \left(\mathrm {Tr} \,\mathbf {E} \right)g^{ij}+2\mu \!\left(X\right)E^{ij}}

where πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathrm {Tr} \,\mathbf {E} \equiv E_{\,i}^{i}}
is the trace of πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {E} }
. In this form, πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mu }
and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \lambda }
can be identified with the first and second LamΓ© parameters. An equivalent expression is

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle T^{ij}=K\!\left(X\right)\cdot \left(\mathrm {Tr} \,\mathbf {E} \right)g^{ij}+2\mu \!\left(X\right)\Sigma ^{ij}}

where πŸ‘ {\displaystyle K=\lambda +(2/3)\mu }
is the bulk modulus, and

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \Sigma ^{ij}\equiv E^{ij}-(1/3)\left(\mathrm {Tr} \,\mathbf {E} \right)g^{ij}}

are the components of the shear tensor πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {\Sigma } }
.

Cubic crystals

[edit]

The elasticity tensor of a cubic crystal has components

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}C^{ijkl}&=\lambda g^{ij}g^{kl}+\mu \left(g^{ik}g^{jl}+g^{il}g^{kj}\right)\\&+\alpha \left(a^{i}a^{j}a^{k}a^{l}+b^{i}b^{j}b^{k}b^{l}+c^{i}c^{j}c^{k}c^{l}\right)\end{aligned}}}

where πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {a} }
, πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {b} }
, and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {c} }
are unit vectors corresponding to the three mutually perpendicular axes of the crystal unit cell.[8] The coefficients πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \lambda }
, πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mu }
, and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \alpha }
are scalars; because they are coordinate-independent, they are intrinsic material constants. Thus, a crystal with cubic symmetry is described by three independent elastic constants.[9]

In an orthonormal Cartesian coordinate basis, there is no distinction between upper and lower indices, and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle g^{ij}}
is the Kronecker delta, so the expression simplifies to

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}C_{ijkl}&=\lambda \delta _{ij}\delta _{kl}+\mu \left(\delta _{ik}\delta _{jl}+\delta _{il}\delta _{kj}\right)\\&+\alpha \left(a_{i}a_{j}a_{k}a_{l}+b_{i}b_{j}b_{k}b_{l}+c_{i}c_{j}c_{k}c_{l}\right)\end{aligned}}}

Other crystal classes

[edit]

There are similar expressions for the components of πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {C} }
in other crystal symmetry classes.[10] The number of independent elastic constants for several of these is given in table 1.[9]

Table 1: Number of independent elastic constants for various crystal symmetry classes.[9]
Crystal family Point group Independent components
Triclinic 21
Monoclinic 13
Orthorhombic 9
Tetragonal C4, S4, C4h 7
Tetragonal C4v, D2d, D4, D4h 6
Rhombohedral C3, S6 7
Rhombohedral C3v, D6, D3d 6
Hexagonal 5
Cubic 3

Properties

[edit]

Symmetries

[edit]

The elasticity tensor has several symmetries that follow directly from its defining equation πŸ‘ {\displaystyle T^{ij}=C^{ijkl}E_{kl}}
.[11][2] The symmetry of the stress and strain tensors implies that

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle C_{ijkl}=C_{jikl}\qquad {\text{and}}\qquad C_{ijkl}=C_{ijlk},}

Usually, one also assumes that the stress derives from an elastic energy potential πŸ‘ {\displaystyle U}
:

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle T^{ij}={\frac {\partial U}{\partial E_{ij}}}}

which implies

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle C_{ijkl}={\frac {\partial ^{2}U}{\partial E_{ij}\partial E_{kl}}}}

Hence, πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {C} }
must be symmetric under interchange of the first and second pairs of indices:

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle C_{ijkl}=C_{klij}}

The symmetries listed above reduce the number of independent components from 81 to 21. If a material has additional symmetries, then this number is further reduced.[9]

Transformations

[edit]

Under rotation, the components πŸ‘ {\displaystyle C^{ijkl}}
transform as

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle C'_{ijkl}=R_{ip}R_{jq}R_{kr}R_{ls}C^{pqrs}}

where πŸ‘ {\displaystyle C'_{ijkl}}
are the covariant components in the rotated basis, and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle R_{ij}}
are the elements of the corresponding rotation matrix. A similar transformation rule holds for other linear transformations.

Invariants

[edit]

The components of πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {C} }
generally acquire different values under a change of basis. Nevertheless, for certain types of transformations, there are specific combinations of components, called invariants, that remain unchanged. Invariants are defined with respect to a given set of transformations, formally known as a group operation. For example, an invariant with respect to the group of proper orthogonal transformations, called SO(3), is a quantity that remains constant under arbitrary 3D rotations.

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {C} }
possesses two linear invariants and seven quadratic invariants with respect to SO(3).[12] The linear invariants are

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}L_{1}&=C_{\,\,\,ij}^{ij}\\L_{2}&=C_{\,\,\,jj}^{ii}\end{aligned}}}

and the quadratic invariants are

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \left\{L_{1}^{2},\,L_{2}^{2},\,L_{1}L_{2},\,C_{ijkl}C^{ijkl},\,C_{iikl}C^{jjkl},\,C_{iikl}C^{jkjl},\,C_{kiil}C^{kjjl}\right\}}

These quantities are linearly independent, that is, none can be expressed as a linear combination of the others. They are also complete, in the sense that there are no additional independent linear or quadratic invariants.[12]

Decompositions

[edit]

A common strategy in tensor analysis is to decompose a tensor into simpler components that can be analyzed separately. For example, the displacement gradient tensor πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {W} =\mathbf {\nabla } \mathbf {\xi } }
can be decomposed as

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {W} ={\frac {1}{3}}\Theta \mathbf {g} +\mathbf {\Sigma } +\mathbf {R} }

where πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \Theta }
is a rank-0 tensor (a scalar), equal to the trace of πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {W} }
; πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {\Sigma } }
is symmetric and trace-free; and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {R} }
is antisymmetric.[13] Component-wise,

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\Sigma ^{ij}\equiv W^{(ij)}&={\frac {1}{2}}\left(W^{ij}+W^{ji}\right)-{\frac {1}{3}}\left(\mathrm {Tr} \,\mathbf {W} \right)g^{ij}\\R^{ij}\equiv W^{[ij]}&={\frac {1}{2}}\left(W^{ij}-W^{ji}\right)\end{aligned}}}

Here and later, symmetrization and antisymmetrization are denoted by πŸ‘ {\displaystyle (ij)}
and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle [ij]}
, respectively. This decomposition is irreducible, in the sense of being invariant under rotations, and is an important tool in the conceptual development of continuum mechanics.[11]

The elasticity tensor has rank 4, and its decompositions are more complex and varied than those of a rank-2 tensor.[14] A few examples are described below.

M and N tensors

[edit]

This decomposition is obtained by symmeterization and antisymmeterization of the middle two indices:

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle C^{ijkl}=M^{ijkl}+N^{ijkl}}

where

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}M^{ijkl}\equiv C^{i(jk)l}={\frac {1}{2}}\left(C^{ijkl}+C^{ikjl}\right)\\N^{ijkl}\equiv C^{i[jk]l}={\frac {1}{2}}\left(C^{ijkl}-C^{ikjl}\right)\end{aligned}}}

A disadvantage of this decomposition is that πŸ‘ {\displaystyle M^{ijkl}}
and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle N^{ijkl}}
do not obey all original symmetries of πŸ‘ {\displaystyle C^{ijkl}}
, as they are not symmetric under interchange of the first two indices. In addition, it is not irreducible, so it is not invariant under linear transformations such as rotations.[2]

Irreducible representations

[edit]

An irreducible representation can be built by considering the notion of a totally symmetric tensor, which is invariant under the interchange of any two indices. A totally symmetric tensor πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {S} }
can be constructed from πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {C} }
by summing over all πŸ‘ {\displaystyle 4!=24}
permutations of the indices

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}S^{ijkl}&={\frac {1}{4!}}\sum _{(i,j,k,l)\in S_{4}}C^{ijkl}\\&={\frac {1}{4!}}\left(C^{ijkl}+C^{jikl}+C^{ikjl}+\ldots \right)\end{aligned}}}

where πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbb {S} _{4}}
is the set of all permutations of the four indices.[2] Owing to the symmetries of πŸ‘ {\displaystyle C^{ijkl}}
, this sum reduces to

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle S^{ijkl}={\frac {1}{3}}\left(C^{ijkl}+C^{iklj}+C^{iljk}\right)}

The difference

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle A^{ijkl}\equiv C^{ijkl}-S^{ijkl}={\frac {1}{3}}\left(2C^{ijkl}-C^{ilkj}-C^{iklj}\right)}

is an asymmetric tensor (not antisymmetric). The decomposition πŸ‘ {\displaystyle C^{ijkl}=S^{ijkl}+A^{ijkl}}
can be shown to be unique and irreducible with respect to πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbb {S} _{4}}
. In other words, any additional symmetrization operations on πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {S} }
or πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {A} }
will either leave it unchanged or evaluate to zero. It is also irreducible with respect to arbitrary linear transformations, that is, the general linear group πŸ‘ {\displaystyle G(3,\mathbb {R} )}
.[2][15]

However, this decomposition is not irreducible with respect to the group of rotations SO(3). Instead, πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {S} }
decomposes into three irreducible parts, and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {A} }
into two:

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}C^{ijkl}&=S^{ijkl}+A^{ijkl}\\&=\left(^{(1)}\!S^{ijkl}+\,^{(2)}\!S^{ijkl}+\,^{(3)}\!S^{ijkl}\right)+\,\left(^{(1)}\!A^{ijkl}+^{(2)}\!A^{ijkl}\right)\end{aligned}}}

See Itin (2020)[15] for explicit expressions in terms of the components of πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbf {C} }
.

This representation decomposes the space of elasticity tensors into a direct sum of subspaces:

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}=\left(^{(1)}\!{\mathcal {C}}\oplus \,^{(2)}\!{\mathcal {C}}\oplus \,^{(3)}\!{\mathcal {C}}\right)\oplus \,\left(^{(4)}\!{\mathcal {C}}\oplus \,^{(5)}\!{\mathcal {C}}\right)}

with dimensions

πŸ‘ {\displaystyle 21=(1\oplus 5\oplus 9)\oplus (1\oplus 5)}

These subspaces are each isomorphic to a harmonic tensor space πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbb {H} _{n}(\mathbb {R} ^{3})}
.[15][16] Here, πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbb {H} _{n}(\mathbb {R} ^{3})}
is the space of 3D, totally symmetric, traceless tensors of rank πŸ‘ {\displaystyle n}
. In particular, πŸ‘ {\displaystyle ^{(1)}\!{\mathcal {C}}}
and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle ^{(4)}\!{\mathcal {C}}}
correspond to πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbb {H} _{0}}
, πŸ‘ {\displaystyle ^{(2)}\!{\mathcal {C}}}
and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle ^{(5)}\!{\mathcal {C}}}
correspond to πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbb {H} _{2}}
, and πŸ‘ {\displaystyle ^{(3)}\!{\mathcal {C}}}
corresponds to πŸ‘ {\displaystyle \mathbb {H} _{4}}
.

See also

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Here, upper and lower indices denote contravariant and covariant components, respectively, though the distinction can be ignored for Cartesian coordinates. As a result, some references represent components using only lower indices.
  2. ^ Combining the forward and inverse stress-strain relations gives Eij = Kijpq CpqklEkl. Due to the minor symmetries Cpqkl = Cqpkl and Cpqkl = Cpqlk, this equation does not uniquely determine Kijpq Cpqkl. In fact, Kijpq Cpqkl = a Ξ΄kiΞ΄lj + (1 βˆ’ a) Ξ΄liΞ΄kj is a solution for any 0 ≀ a ≀ 1. However, only a = 1/2 preserves the minor symmetries of K, so this is the correct solution from a physical standpoint.

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]