VOOZH about

URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslaha

⇱ Maslaha - Wikipedia


Jump to content
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Public welfare in Islamic jurisprudence
Part of a series on
Principles of
Islamic jurisprudence
(Usul al-Fiqh)
👁 Image
Fiqh
Ahkam
Legal vocations and titles

Maslaha or maslahah or maslahat (Arabic: مصلحة, lit.'benefit, public interest') or maslaha mursala (Arabic: مصالح مرسلة, lit.'"sent", "transmitted", "unbonded", "open" or "unconditional" public interest'), comes from the term "Salihat" (good deeds, also linked to Islah and Istislah), is a concept in Sharia (Islamic divine law) regarded as a basis of law.[1] It forms a part of extended methodological principles of Islamic jurisprudence (uṣūl al-fiqh) and denotes prohibition or permission of something, according to necessity and particular circumstances, on the basis of whether it serves the public interest of the Muslim community (ummah).[1][2] In principle, maslaha is invoked particularly for issues that are not regulated by the Qur'an, the sunnah (the teachings and practices of the Islamic prophet Muhammad), or qiyas (analogy). The concept is acknowledged and employed to varying degrees depending on the jurists and schools of Islamic jurisprudence (madhhab). The application of the concept has become more important in modern times because of its increasing relevance to contemporary legal issues.[1] The opposite term of maslaha is mafsada (مفسدة, harm).[3] Islamic politics is itself predicated on maslaha, and is such changeable, as it must respond to the exigencies of time.[4] The term is different from bidah.[5]

Etymology

[edit]

In Quran

[edit]

According to Mehmet Gormez, in a speech in 5th General Assembly organized in Istanbul by the International Union of Muslim Scholars, the verbal roots of words maslaha and mafsada both are mentioned together in Quran in chapter al-Baqarah's verse no 11, and also in verse 11:117 and 2:205 differently, where all refers towards equal meaining of maslaha and mafsada.[6]

And when it is said to them, "Do not cause corruption (تُفۡسِدُوۡا, tufsidu) on the earth," they say, "We are but reformers (مُصۡلِحُوۡنَ, muslihun).

— Quran 2:11

And when he goes away, he strives throughout the land to cause corruption (لِیُفۡسِدَ, yufsidu) therein and destroy crops and animals. And Allah does not like corruption (ٱلۡفَسَادَ, al-fasad).

— Quran 2:205

And your Lord would not have destroyed the cities unjustly while their people were reformers (مُصْلِحُونَ, muslihun).

— Quran 11:117

×===In Hadith=== A hadith is also used to be referred in case of maslaha and mafsada where Islamic prophet Muhammad said about neither doing harm nor being harmed.[7]

Abu Sa’id al-Khudri reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Do not cause harm or return harm. Whoever harms others, Allah will harm him. Whoever is harsh with others, Allah will be harsh with him.”

— Source: al-Sunan al-Kubrá lil-Bayhaqī 11384, Grade: Hasan (fair) according to Al-Albani

Another hadith is used to determine the co-ordination between maslaha and mafsada is:[8]

The Prophet (pbuh) said, "Leave me as I leave you, for the people who were before you were ruined because of their questions and their differences over their prophets. So, if I forbid you to do something, then keep away from it. And if I order you to do something, then do of it as much as you can."

— (bukhari:7288)

Muhammad forbade disobedience to prohibitions unless absolutely necessary, but he conditioned compliance to mandates on capacity. This shows that when obligations conflict, avoiding prohibitions takes precedence over performing them. When a substantial harm exceeds a gain, this adage is applicable. However, seeking the advantage is given priority if the harm is insignificant in comparison to the significant benefit that results from an activity.[8]

Terminology

[edit]

There are several other equivalent or analogous concepts in Uṣūl al-fiqh, some of each associated with respective maddhabs. The concept of maqasid (aim or purpose) is comparable in a sense that connotes both the ultimate objective and the goal of the application of the Sharia. The concept of istislah is a related subject, which is employed by Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal.[1] The meaning of maslaha is "public interest", and the meaning of istislah is "to seek the best public interest", the Sharia's object and purpose.[9] The concept of istihsan means equitable preference for finding solutions to the legal issues. The term is used by the Hanafi school of law, and according to the understanding, the results of qiyas can be overridden when it is considered harmful or undesirable. The term was also used by the Hanbali scholar Ibn Qudamah and by the Maliki jurist Averroes. The Shafi'i school does not recognize the application of maslaha, as it may open the door to the unrestricted use based on fallible human opinions, but it has a corresponding concept, istidlal, which is induced when necessary to avoid the strict application of qiyas.[1]

History

[edit]

The concept was first clearly articulated by al-Ghazali (died 1111), who argued that maslaha was Allah's general purpose in revealing the divine law, and that its specific aims was preservation of five essentials of human well-being: religion, life, intellect, offspring, and property.[10] Ghazali said in his book Al-Mustasfa that,

"The objectives and goals or maqasid of the Islamic Shariah are known from the Quran, Sunnah and Ijma', that which safeguards the five essentials is considered as maslahah and good, and that which harms the five essentials is considered as mafsada or evil and when two evils or harms come into conflict with each other, in such a way that one of them must be dealt with, then the aim and intention of the Shariah originator is to prevent the greater harm."[11]

Although most classical-era jurists recognized maslaha as an important legal principle, they held different views regarding the role that it should play in Islamic law.[12][13] Some jurists viewed it as auxiliary rationale constrained by scriptural sources and analogical reasoning.[12][14] Others regarded the concept as an independent source of law, whose general principles could override specific inferences based on the letter of scripture.[12][15] The latter view was held by a minority of classical jurists, but in modern times, it came to be championed in different forms by prominent scholars who sought to adapt Islamic law to changing social conditions by drawing on the intellectual heritage of traditional jurisprudence.[12][16][17] Along with the analogous concept of maqasid, it has come to play an increasingly prominent role in modern time because of the need to confront legal issues that were unknown in the past.[1][12][17][13] According to Ibn al-Qayyim, the measures taken to bring people closer to goodness (salaah) and keep them away from corruption (fasad), "Even if these matters are not permitted in the Quran or the Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad, policy and politics of Shariah is formed by the combination of all of these."[18]

Usage

[edit]

Maslaha was used in one sense by the Andalusian lawyer al-Shatibi (died 1388), who focused on the motivations behind the Islamic law. Regarding questions related to God, ibadat, humans should look to the Qur'an or the Sunnah for answers, but regarding the relationship between humans, mu'amalat, humans should look for the best public solution. Since societies change, al-Shatibi thought that the mu'amalat part of the Islamic law also needed to change.[19]

Maslaha has also been used by several Muslim reformers in recent centuries. Ibn Abd al-Wahhab (died 1792) used maslaha in a few cases.[citation needed] The concept is more known to Islamic modernists. Among them, Muhammad Abduh is especially recognized for using the concept of maslaha as the basis for reconciling modern cultural values with the traditional moral code of Islamic law in the late 19th century.[citation needed] The Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamic modernist group, also invokes maslaha to explain their commitment to public welfare.[citation needed]

Hierarchy

[edit]

Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi ​​said, "The greatest maslaha is Tawheed and the greatest mafsada is Shirk."[20]

Khalid bin Fathi, in his book Baghiyat al-Qasid fi Bayan Qawa’id al-Maslih wal-Mafsid (بغية القاصد في بيان قواعد المصالح والمفاسد, The Seeker’s Purpose in Explaining the Rules of Maslahah or Good and Mafsada or Evil), while classifying the Maslahah and Mafsada, said, “If Ibn Taymiyyah and other Imams, instead of pursuing the Maslahah of Tawheed, were to engage in something that is only a branch of it and without which it has no value, how much trouble would have befallen the land of Muslims. And the way to prevent the greatest evil, such as shirk and disbelief in Allah, is to prevent the lesser evils or those that are derived from it. The attainment of the greatest Maslahah, i.e., the Maslahah of Tawheed, depends on achieving it, and avoiding Mafsada is to avoid the Mafsada of associating partners with Allah Almighty.” Dependent on—this does not mean that there is any conflict between the benefits of Tawheed and other benefits or good, or between avoiding the harm of associating partners with Almighty Allah and avoiding disbelief in Him and other harms, because the Sharia is complete. It is necessary to give priority to Tawheed over Shirk and to promote it by ensuring all the basic and ancillary benefits and avoiding all the harms as much as possible. Because these are the foundation and pillars of Islam, on which Islam is founded, and they are the basis of human happiness in this world and the Hereafter. Whoever clings to them is successful and liberated, and whoever neglects them goes astray and is led by the misguided. Therefore, it is obligatory to give priority to and promote these two principles above all else. The reason for this is that if a person realizes these two principles—i.e., avoiding kufr and shirk and worshipping Allah alone without any partner—it will benefit him in this world and the Hereafter. "It will inevitably lead to all the desired benefits in the Hereafter.[21]

Fahad ibn Salih al-Ajlan said, An example of taking maslahah into account in Sharia is: Sharia rulings vary according to the degree of maslahah. Maslahah is more in wajib than mustahab. Mafsada is more in haram than makruh. Similarly, there is a hierarchy of minor and major in haram.[22]

Al-Shatibi said, 'In the case of asking for or abandoning something, not all commands and prohibitions are of the same level. There is a difference in the consideration of the maslahah of accepting the command and prohibition and the mashadada of not accepting it.[23]

Izz ibn Abdus Salam said, 'There is a distinction in the degree of maslahah-mafsada. According to the level of Maslaha, there will be a difference in status in the worldly view or in terms of virtue. And according to the level of Mafsada, the level of major and minor sins and the level of punishment in this world and the Hereafter will be determined. Among the types of Mafsada, the biggest one is the most harmful. And the smaller one is the less harmful. The level of major Mafsada gradually decreases and reaches a level of Mafsada, from which if it decreases a little, it will reach the highest level of Mafsada. And this is the second level. Again, the minor Mafsada gradually decreases and reaches a level from which if it decreases a little, it will reach the highest level of Makruh. And this is the second type of Mafsada levels. The harm of makruh gradually decreases to a point where it becomes permissible if it is lowered a little.[24]

Qarafi said, 'The command of the Shariah seeks the 'dominant benefit'. And the prohibition of the Shariah seeks the 'dominant harm'. By following the lowest level of benefit, virtue is achieved. Then, as the benefit rises, it reaches such a high level that it reaches the highest level of mustahab. The level above it is the lowest level of wajib. And the lowest level of harm is the level of dislike or makruh. Then, as the corruption rises, it reaches the highest level of dislike, above which is the lowest level of haram.[25]

Tufi said, 'The difference between praise, blame, goodness and punishment will depend on how much the good and bad deeds lead to benefit and corruption.[26]

Qarafi said, 'All these texts demand that everyone abstain from the dominant mafsada, the non-dominant maslahah, the area where maslahah-mafsada is equal, and the area where maslahah-mafsada is not there (these four). Because these four types are not the best. Rather, the demand of leadership is to ensure pure and complete maslahah and to prevent complete and fundamental mafsada.[27]

Istikharah is also prescribed for making Islamic political decisions that are not clearly resolved or beneficial in the Quran and Hadith.[28] Abdullah al-Ghudayyan said, "If the benefit or harm, or the good or the bad, is not clear in a necessary or very important matter, then one should make istikhara."[29] Tahir ibn Husayn advised his son Abdullah ibn Tahir after he became governor of Diyar Rabi'a:

Whenever an important matter befalls you, seek help from Allah by making istikhara and fearing Him... and make istikhara abundantly in all your affairs.[30][31]

Examples

[edit]

Primary

[edit]

Rashidun caliphs

[edit]
Abu Bakr
  • canonized the Quran into one volume.
  • fought against those who refused to pay Zakat and appointed Umar ibn al-Khattab as his successor.[18]
Umar ibn al-Khattab
  • held officials accountable for misusing power and confiscated wealth.
  • Punishments included pouring milk mixed with water
  • suspending hadd for theft during famine
  • approving the Companions' opinion of punishing groups for killing despite Quran's clear provisions.[18]
Uthman ibn Affan
  • distributed the authentic Quran and destroyed all other versions
  • declared it permissible to inherit a woman whose husband had divorced her to deprive her of inheritance.[18]
Ali ibn Abi Talib
  • held artisans and merchants responsible for the loss of goods stored with them[18]

Later rulers and traditional jurists (fuqaha al-turathi)

[edit]
  • Hajjaj ibn Yusuf - Adding diacritical marks to the letters of Quranic texts for non-Arab readers.[32]
  • Malik bin Anas - gave fatwa for later rulers about not breaking and rebuilding Kaaba after Hajjaj ibn Yusuf following Abdullah ibn Zubayr to preserve Kaaba's honour.[33]
  • Before converting to Islam on a political contract basis, the neo-Muslim Ghazan, according to the Mongols' pre-Islamic Yasa custom, married his stepmother Bulghan Khatun Muazzema after his father's death, but after knowing the Islamic rule of forbiddance of marrying stepmothers, he ignored the Islamic law because of his weakness to stepmother, abandoned Islam and attempted to massacre Syrian Muslims by overruling the previous contract. In order to dissuade him from doing so, some jurist of that time deceicively presented the marriage legal to him and encouraged him to remain in Islam, thus saving him from the great harm of genocide and apostasy, and giving Ghazan a long time and opportunity to realize his mistake.[34]
  • The practice of Muhammad the Conqueror, which allowed the ruling Ottoman ruler among his sons to kill his brothers for the sake of power, was unanimously declared unlawful by all later scholars.[35]

Schools of law

[edit]
  • Scholars support sanctions on ignorant doctors, muftis, and fraudsters to protect people, and Malikis approve arrests and punishment under tajir, even without evidence.[18]

Some of the instances of maslahah in the Maliki doctrine:

  • The Imam's office is validated by an oath of allegiance to the mafdul (inferior), preventing chaos.
  • If the public treasury runs out of funds, the Imam may impose additional taxes on the wealthy to prevent corruption.
  • If lawful living is inaccessible, Muslims can engage in unlawful occupations, but only to the extent necessary.[18]

There is also:

  • If the wali does not agree after the marriage without the consent of the wali, the husband becomes permanently forbidden.[36]
  • In a situation where there is no alternative way to avoid adultery, masturbation, which is normally or generally considered haram, should be declared permissible only for that specific time.[37][38]
  • * If a hadith whose narration is weak (da'if khafif) is supported by more than one good or strong narration (hasan or sahih) hadith, then the less weak hadith is considered good or hasan (hasan li ghairihi, good because of (the support of) others) or acceptable in support of the given hadiths, for example, most of the hadiths of Ibn Lahi'a.[39][40]

Contemporary

[edit]
  • Not breaking Green Dome made by Qalawun, temporarily in spite of being against sahih hadith, in order to prevent fitna and chaos among muslims[41]
  • Get a medical checkup for sexually transmitted diseases before marriage.[42]
  • Vaccination for the performers of Hajj and Umrah[43]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f I. Doi, Abdul Rahman. (1995). "Mașlahah". In John L. Esposito. The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. ^ Abdul Aziz bin Sattam (2015). Sharia and the Concept of Benefit: The Use and Function of Maslaha in Islamic Jurisprudence. London: I.B.Tauris. ISBN 9781784530242.
  3. ^ Siddiqui, Sohaira (4 February 2018). Locating the Sharīʿa: Legal Fluidity in Theory, History and Practice. BRILL. p. 143. ISBN 978-90-04-39171-0. Retrieved 15 August 2025.
  4. ^ Malekian, Farhad (30 September 2018). Corpus Juris of Islamic International Criminal Justice. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 143. ISBN 978-1-5275-1693-9. Retrieved 21 August 2025.
  5. ^ "Bid'ah (innovation) and maslahah mursalah (consideration of public interest); and the similarities and differences between them - Islam Question & Answer". Islam-QA. Retrieved 25 September 2025.
  6. ^ Gormez, Mehmet (20 June 2025). "বিশ্বায়নের যুগে মাসলাহাত প্রতিষ্ঠায় মুসলিম স্কলারদের ভূমিকা - রোয়াক" [The role of Muslim scholars in establishing Maslahat in the era of globalization - Rowak] (in Bengali). royakbd.com. Retrieved 22 August 2025.
  7. ^ Khaleefah, Sarah (6 December 2022). "Justice and Autonomy in Islamic Bioethics". Acta Cogitata: An Undergraduate Journal in Philosophy. 10 (1). Michigan State University. Retrieved 23 August 2025. In a hadith, the Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) states that "there is no harm or harming in Islam"...Through the commitment to foster justice through their negative and positive obligations, Muslims' sphere of autonomous self-determination is limited in order for individuals to consider the interest of the public, known as maslaha mursala, when making decisions.
  8. ^ a b Djafer, Abdelkader (20 October 2025). "Rulings on Harm and Its Rules in Islamic Fiqh". El-Wahat Journal for Research and Studies. 18 (1): 35. doi:10.54246/3g20ze22. ISSN 2588-1892. Retrieved 12 November 2025.
  9. ^ John L. Esposito (2003). The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199757268.
  10. ^ Opwis 2007, p. 65.
  11. ^ Elahi, Mohammad Manzoor; Zakaria, Abubakar Muhammad (2012). "ইসলামী শারীয়াহ্ এর উদ্দেশ্য ও লক্ষ্য : বর্তমান প্রেক্ষাপটে এর গুরুত্ব" [The Purpose and Objectives of Islamic Sharia: Its Importance in the Current Context]. islamcontent.com. Retrieved 16 August 2025.
  12. ^ a b c d e Duderija 2014, pp. 2–6.
  13. ^ a b Gleave 2012.
  14. ^ Opwis 2007, pp. 66–68.
  15. ^ Opwis 2007, pp. 68–69.
  16. ^ Ziadeh 2009.
  17. ^ a b Brown 2009.
  18. ^ a b c d e f g Kamali, Mohammad Hashim (2003). Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. Islamic Texts Society. pp. 235–237. ISBN 978-0-946621-82-8. Retrieved 15 August 2025.
  19. ^ Knut S. Vikør (2005). Between God and the Sultan: A History of Islamic Law. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195223989.
  20. ^ "كلمة بعنوان: التوحيد أعظم المصالح والشرك أعظم المفاسد للشيخ أبو محمد المقدسي". 9 May 2021. Retrieved 24 March 2026.
  21. ^ الأغا, خالد بن فتحي بن خالد (15 October 2019). بغية القاصد في بيان قواعد المصالح والمفاسد | جامع الكتب الإسلامية (in Arabic). المكتبة الشاملة الذهبية. pp. 39, 40. Retrieved 24 March 2026.
  22. ^ Al-Muharrir fi Siyasat al-Shariah, 255
  23. ^ Al-Muwafaqat (3:536).
  24. ^ (Al-Qawa'id al-Kubra (1:78). See also: Al-Qawa'id al-Kubra (1:77), (1:4)-42).
  25. ^ Al-Furuk (2:18). Tankihul Fusul (451).
  26. ^ Mukhtasarut Tirmidhi (2:388). See in the same sense: Mukhtasarut Tirmidhi (1:107), (2:95). For the difference in rulings on the difference in maslahah, see Muhammad Amin Suhaili's 'Qaidatu Daril Mafasid Awla Min-Jalbil Masalih' (95-96).
  27. ^ Al-Furuq (4:39). For more information, see: Al-Furuq (2:162), Ay-Zaghirah (6:223). Many Malikis have quoted Qarafi's statement. See: At-Taj wal-Iqlil (6:401), Sharhu Maiyara Ala-Tuhfatil Ahkam (2:40), Al-Mi'yarul Mu'rib (7:19-20)
  28. ^ "حكم الاستخارة في مسائل شرعية لا يُدرَى وجه الصواب فيها". www.islamweb.net (in Arabic). Retrieved 3 August 2025.
  29. ^ "بعد صلاة الاستخارة والسعي في الأمر إذا وجدت بعض العقبات هل يتوقف الإنسان ويعدل عن الأمر أم يستمر حتى تنفك هذه العقبات؟". فضيلة الشيخ عبدالله بن عبدالرحمن بن غديان رحمه الله (in Arabic). 7 May 2022. Retrieved 6 March 2026. أما إذا لم تتميز له المصلحة ولم تتميز له المفسدة فتشرع له صلاة الاستخارة، وهو عندما ينتهي من صلاة الاستخارة وينتهي من الدعاء ينظر إلى ما يسبق إلى قلبه، فإن حصل في قلبه انشراحٌ لهذا الأمر أقدم عليه، وإن أحس أن فيه انقباضاً فإنه يحجم عنه؛ هذا باعتبار ما يقع بعد الانتهاء من دعاء الاستخارة. (If the benefit and harm are not clear to him, then the prayer of Istikhara is made obligatory for him. When he finishes the prayer of Istikhara and the supplication, he sees what comes to his heart. If he feels comfortable in his heart about this, then he proceeds with it. If he feels a sense of constriction in it, then he refrains from it. This is considering what happens after finishing the prayer of Istikhara.)
  30. ^ Ansa, Muhammad (1 January 2014). Istikhara - In The Light Of The Sunnah. Turath Publishing. ISBN 978-1-906949-27-3. Retrieved 8 August 2025.
  31. ^ "كتاب : تاريخ الرسل والملوك 29". www.islamicbook.ws. Retrieved 8 August 2025.
  32. ^ The Great Medieval Civilizations: 1963. Allen and Unwin for the International Commission for a History of the Scientific and Cultural Development of Mankind. 1975. p. 390. ISBN 978-0-04-900225-8. Retrieved 30 August 2025.
  33. ^ al-Ouda, Salman (13 July 2016). "For Allah's Sake, Don't Do It". About Islam. Retrieved 1 September 2025.
  34. ^ Sharia Politics, Fahad bin Salih Al Azlan, Translated by Abdullah Majumdar, Edited by Abubakar Muhammad Zakaria, September 2025, Pages: 360-364
  35. ^ Shari'a Politics, Fahd bin Salih Al-Ajlan, Translated by Abdullah Majumdar, Edited by Abu Bakr Muhammad Zakaria, September 2025, pp. 364-368
  36. ^ العجلان, فهد صالح (1 June 2022). المحرر في السياسة الشرعية (in Arabic). آفاق المعرفة للنشر. pp. 361–364. Retrieved 16 November 2025.
  37. ^ https://www.islamweb.net/ar/library/content/22/6048/%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%A3%D9%84%D8%A9-%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%85%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%A1
  38. ^ https://shamela.ws/book/9690/1337
  39. ^ "التفريغ النصي - شرح كتاب الباعث الحثيث - تعاريف أخرى للحسن - للشيخ حسن أبو الأشبال الزهيري". Islamweb إسلام ويب (in Arabic). Retrieved 30 March 2026.
  40. ^ الصالح, عبد الملك (13 January 2023). "الحديث الضعيف..كيف ظهر؟ ولماذا رواه المحدِّثون؟". مجلة رواء (in Arabic). Retrieved 30 March 2026.
  41. ^ "History of the Green Dome in Madinah - Islam Question & Answer". Islam-QA. Retrieved 15 August 2025.
  42. ^ العجلان, فهد صالح (1 June 2022). المحرر في السياسة الشرعية (in Arabic). آفاق المعرفة للنشر. pp. 365–367. Retrieved 16 November 2025.
  43. ^ https://jurnal.istaz.ac.id/index.php/fikroh/article/download/1647/472/4609

Sources

[edit]
  • Brown, Jonathan A. C. (2009). "Maṣlaḥah". In John L. Esposito (ed.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on October 11, 2017.
  • Duderija, Adis (2014). Adis Duderija (ed.). Contemporary Muslim Reformist Thought and Maqāṣid cum Maṣlaḥa Approaches to Islamic Law: An Introduction. Vol. Maqasid al-Shari'a and Contemporary Reformist Muslim Thought: An Examination. Springer.
  • Gleave, R.M. (2012). "Maḳāṣid al-Sharīʿa". In P. Bearman; Th. Bianquis; C.E. Bosworth; E. van Donzel; W.P. Heinrichs (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam (2nd ed.). Brill. doi:10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_8809.
  • Opwis, Felicitas (2007). Abbas Amanat; Frank Griffel (eds.). Islamic Law and Legal Change: The Concept of Maslaha in Classical and Contemporary Legal Theory. Vol. Shari'a: Islamic Law in the Contemporary Context. Stanford University Press.
  • Ziadeh, Farhat J. (2009). "Uṣūl al-fiqh". In John L. Esposito (ed.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acref/9780195305135.001.0001. ISBN 9780195305135.

External links

[edit]
Look up مصلحة in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.