VOOZH about

URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Navbox/doc

⇱ Template talk:Navbox - Wikipedia


Jump to content
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Template talk:Navbox/doc)
πŸ‘ icon
To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, Module talk:NavboxModule talk:Navbox redirects here.
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15
Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18
Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21
Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24
Archive 25

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 120 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.

Rfc: Deprecation of the image and imageleft parameters

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Involved, informal close: I am informally closing this discussion as snow oppose. It wasn't really an RFC, and I am involved in the discussion, but I hope it won't be objectionable for me to put a hat on this discussion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:35, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[]

The image and imageleft parameters to be deprecated --2600:1700:6180:6290:B0E2:DAA1:CCE8:7D41 (talk) 16:53, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[]

When looking at many navboxes such as Template:Donald Trump, these images violate WP:DECOR, and the image and imageleft parameters should be deprecated and not to be used for new work. This is a statement from Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Icons Β§ Encyclopedic purpose on when and when not to use images in articles:

Icons should serve an encyclopedic purpose and not merely be decorative. They should provide additional useful information on the article subject, serve as visual cues that aid the reader's comprehension, or improve navigation. Icons should not be added only because they look good: one reader's harmless decoration may be another reader's distraction. An icon is purely decorative if it does not improve comprehension of the article subject and serves no navigational function. Where icons are used for layout purposes only, consider using bullet points as an alternative.

In order to comply with the WP:DECOR guideline, I think deprecating the image and imageleft parameters would make more sense than having to create a guideline inside Wikipedia:Navigation template Β§ Navigation templates are not arbitrarily decorative. --2600:1700:6180:6290:B0E2:DAA1:CCE8:7D41 (talk) 16:53, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[]

Survey

[edit]

Discussion

[edit]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sync with sandbox

[edit]
πŸ‘ Image
This edit request to Module:Navbox has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Better table semantics (Template:Navbox with columns' column headers now use <th> instead of <td>). sapphaline (talk) 13:03, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[]

πŸ‘ Image
 Done
β€”Please report any issues. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:00, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[]

Derived template does not update links

[edit]

In template Template:Bilasuvar District I disambiguated one item. I know ity usually takes some time to propagate the backlinks, it usually takes a couple hours. But in this case nearly 24h passed, and still wrong "pages that link to". When I click on the chanhed item in template, [Ashim, Azerbaijan|Ashim] it opens correct page, but this page is not linked from other artiicles tgaht contain this template. Any suggestions? --Altenmann >talk 20:33, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[]

Patience is the best answer. The job queue will get to it in somewhere between a few hours and a few days, usually. If you are impatient, you can null-edit the affected pages. I have done so for you. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:55, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[]

Mobile view wanted

[edit]

Hello, when I asked earlier on the help desk (Special:PermaLink/1342484613#Navigation template doesn't show up in mobile view) about the fact that navboxes don't show up in the mobile view, I learned from another Wikimedian that this is by design. He also hinted at the possibility of using personal CSS to enable it. So far, I found mentions of why that design was made in a way to be hidden on mobile views in Template talk:Navbox/Archive 18#Not visible in App from 2015, Template talk:Navbox/Archive 22#Navbox not displaying on mobile sites from 2018 and phab:T124168 from 2024, summarising, it's apparently due to the intent of reducing the amount of transmitted data and possibly also issues with screen sizes. Well, wouldn't it be time to reconsider it, now, in 2026?
Usual mobile devices now have a screen resolution equal or better to full HD and even in Germany with its comparatively high priced mobile data transfers, a few KB of additional HTML per page would be imperceptible within the common data flat rates of several GB per month (the tracking ad pestilence is much more data hungry). Anyway, I'd be glad if at least somebody could tell me what CSS is needed to enable these navboxes for me in mobile view! I didn't see any instruction for it either in the TP archive nor on Phabricator. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 06:25, 9 March 2026 (UTC) (PS. Please ping me in any answer as I'm actually more of a regular on Commons and DE-WP)[]

There is no CSS which enables them in mobile view. As noted, the intent is to reduce the HTML load, and it happens the way this is done is to remove the HTML entirely from the page. (Which is realistically the only way such a thing could be implemented.)
Remember that you, as a contributor from a developed country, do not have the same restrictions on hardware and data infrastructure as people in developing countries. Izno (talk) 16:24, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[]
And it turns out it is not a "few" KBs, the price is substantial for a construct which has little to no benefit for the vast majority of mobile readers. Izno (talk) 16:25, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[]
My "developed country" is, in fact, in my opinion somewhat behind when speaking about mobile internet. Our local right-wing parties already stoke ressentiment against refugees also because they usually own quite high-end smartphones - but that's disregarding that we autochthones have access to landlines, desktop computers and public authority offices, whereas immigrants do rely upon their device for everything: communicating, banking, organising everyday life, etc. So, it's no wonder that they have a single device fit for holding an entire life.
Additionally, navboxes are things that would likely benefit readers much more than editors: in a book, we're turning pages, on Wikipedia, we're clicking navigation links. For casually browsing, reading and learning, navboxes are important, I'd say. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 10:58, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[]
On my Android tablet in Chrome I can turn on desktop view (bottom of screen). That makes navboxes visible though I am glad they are at the end of articles where I can easily ignore them. Thincat (talk) 11:06, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[]
The importance of navboxes as maps to their Wikipedia topics remains a key component feature of original Wikipedia. Mobile readers are missing these maps, and one present-time solution may be to add a line on each mobile view that the maps exist and can be viewed on desktop/laptops. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:11, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[]
@Thincat: I certainly know about the mobile/desktop view switch. Actually, the desktop view of the watchlist (for me: on Commons) is a bit more comfortable, as it condenses category changes (e.g. for c:Category:Media requiring renaming, where you have an item for each change in "mobile", but a summary like "14:34 / Category:Media requiring renaming 52 / changes" in "desktop"). On the other hand, the font size and page layout for an article body makes for a more comfortable reading in the mobile view. I still maintain that the best of both worlds would be having the navboxes in the mobile view, too. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 12:39, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[]
@Randy Kryn: Here's an idea. We have the link as you suggested, but it takes the reader to the navbox template, exactly as if a normal user had clicked the "v" link of the "v-t-e" group. The navbox in the template either has (a) an additional class inside <noinclude>...</noinclude> which makes the navbox visible for mobile users, or it has (b) modified behaviour in Module:Navbox/styles.css for the existing navbox class so that it's visible on the template page, but still not in articles. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:43, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[]