Hi,
I'm not a native speaker, so I can only offer my limited experience:
Blunder isn't that harsh, it's a way to call a really daft thing someone did. Blunderer is a lot nastier: it's not the act that it criticises, but the person. I think it's more powerful than "clumsy," for instance. It's also pretty informal so I don't think a "strict but not rude" chief would use it.
(the word always makes me think of cartoon baddies shouting "You blundering fool!")
EDIT: Oh, so late yet again...