VOOZH about

URL: https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/labyrinth-vs-maze.223146/

⇱ labyrinth vs maze | WordReference Forums

Menu
Install the app
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

labyrinth vs maze

I was watching the film "Minotaur" and a script line says "...the beast is kept in the labyrinth under the palace...every three years 8 youths would be taken by the royal soldiers and sacrificed to the beast"

My question is "what's the difference between labyrinth and maze?" Can they be used interchangeably? You don't use these words in daily life do you? Comments are welcome. 👁 Big Grin :D


PS: In the movie "Harry Potter III The Goblet of Fire", as I recall it, the word "maze" was deployed throughout the film instead of "labyrinth."
What I found is that a Maze is multicursal, or a series of paths with dead ends and can be quite frustrating. A Labyrinth is unicursal, meaning it has only one path and no dead ends.
Is it? That's quite interesting because I never thought of that before. By "multi/unicursal" do you mean the "winding paths" inside a maze or a labyrinth? I didn't seem to be able to find these two words in my dictionary, yikes! Thanks for your quick reply. 👁 Smile :)
Labyrinth is the specific name of the maze in Greek mythology designed by Daedalus to house the Minotaur, so your script is using the literal meaning. In Modern English it can be used interchangeably with maze. Maze is more common, but labyrinth carries that cool mythological allusion.
The original labyrinth was built on Crete specifically for the Minotaur.

According to Merriam-Webster, a labyrinth is a maze.

The Merriam-Webster definition of labyrinth
1 a : a place constructed of or full of intricate passageways and blind alleys
b : a maze (as in a garden) formed by paths separated by high hedges

The Oxford definitions:
Labyrinth
noun 1 a complicated irregular network of passages or paths

Maze
noun 1 a puzzle consisting of a network of paths and walls or hedges through which one has to find a way.


The meanings are so similar that the Oxford Distionary has a cross-reference from labyrinth to maze in the first definition given.

On a technical viewpoint there is a difference between Labyrinth and labyrinth in that the proper noun version refers specifically to the King Minos maze whereas the lower case word links to common mazes.

.,,
An added note: I don't necessarily use the word labyrinth much in daily life, but I love to use the word labyrinthine whenever I can.👁 Smile :)
I always envisage a labyrinth as being of solid construction, with a roof, and usually underground.
A maze is usually just a convoluted series of paths in a hedgerow.
I always envisage a labyrinth as being of solid construction, with a roof, and usually underground.
A maze is usually just a convoluted series of paths in a hedgerow.
That was my understanding but The Collins Dictionary argued with me and I lost.

.,,
Context) The XXX forest has a lot of very complicated paths in it. If one enter the forest, it is very hard for him to find the exit. If he is unfortunate, he can't get out of it before he dies.

The XXX forest is just as though a labyrinth by nature. ....1
The XXX forest is just as though a maze by nature. ....2

Which makes sense, 1 or 2 or neither?
According to the post #2, I think only 2 is correct.
I don't think that there is any generally understood difference between the maze and labyrinth.

[I wonder about the wording though. Do you mean that the forest is like a labyrinth/maze made by nature? Or do you mean that it has the nature of a labyrinth/maze? If the second, you might say "in nature".

Here is a relevant thread: by nature/in nature.]
To me "labyrinth" sounds more fairytalish than maze.

And

"Maze" sounds more nightmarish, maybe because I read A Maze of Death by Philip K. Dick.
Thank you, Cagey, I got it.
What I wanted to say was "made by nature" version.

And I've learned the difference of the two.

Yet I still wonder, after thinking a while, after philosophical consideration,
"by nature" and "in nature" are saying the same thing in nature. 👁 Wink ;)

As I'm not a philosopher, forget about it.
Volky was right in Post #2 👁 Big Grin :D
Although many use them interchangeably, there is a large group of people who distinguish the words as suggested.

Grace Cathedral in San Francisco has two "labyrinths" and has this to say about them. The page has pictures.
The Labyrinth is an archetype, a divine imprint, found in all religious traditions in various forms around the world....

The labyrinth has only one path so there are no tricks to it and no dead ends. The path winds throughout and becomes a mirror for where we are in our lives....
For an image of the Chartres Labyrinth see here While acknowledging that dictionaries see them as largely synonymous, that site, (www.labyrinthos.net) has this to say
Popular consensus also indicates that labyrinths have one pathway that leads inexorably from the entrance to the goal, albeit often by the most complex and winding of routes. These unicursal designs have been known as labyrinths for thousands of years, and to qualify as a labyrinth, a design should have but one path.
What I found is that a Maze is multicursal, or a series of paths with dead ends and can be quite frustrating. A Labyrinth is unicursal, meaning it has only one path and no dead ends.

Cool... didn't know this
Back
Top Bottom