VOOZH about

URL: https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/surprisingly-humble.580674/

โ‡ฑ surprisingly humble | WordReference Forums


Menu


Install the app
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

surprisingly humble

Well, it does make one think of that, but, actually, surprisingly humble means nothing more than the fact that he is a humble person, a fact that's amazing to us, given his scholarly background.
Being a well-known scientist, he is .




I'd like to make sure if "surprisingly" here refers to "extremely." Thanks.

Not really.
.
.........surprisingly humble--He surprises us because..........
..........extremely humble--He's very humble...........
Being a well-known scientist, he is .




I'd like to make sure if "surprisingly" here refers to "extremely." Thanks.

Your sentence suggests that all well-known scientists are surprisingly humble, Quiet One. I'm not certain that's what you are meaning to say.

For a well-known scientist, he is surprisingly humble would make more sense - and that suggests that one wouldn't expect a well-known scientist to be humble. Changing surprisingly to extremely doesn't stop one being surprised, though it does accentuate his humility.
Your sentence suggests that all well-known scientists are surprisingly humble, Quiet One. I'm not certain that's what you are meaning to say.

For a well-known scientist, he is surprisingly humble would make more sense - and that suggests that one wouldn't expect a well-known scientist to be humble. Changing surprisingly to extremely doesn't stop one being surprised, though it does accentuate his humility.

But I suppose if this is a sentence in the middle of an article about a particular scientist, we won't have this confusion anymore.
But I suppose if this is a sentence in the middle of an article about a particular scientist, we won't have this confusion anymore.
Nichec, your post is so subtle it's got me confused, even knowing you as I do.


Being a well-known scientist, he is .

implies that well-known scientists are surprisingly humble.

Just as:

Being a frog, he has webbed feet

implies that frogs have webbed feet.

I must have missed a point somewhere, again.
Being a well-known scientist, he is .

implies that well-known scientists are surprisingly humble.

I missed that last time... I feel ashamed. I understand what you're saying and you're completely right.
Nichec, your post is so subtle it's got me confused, even knowing you as I do.


Being a well-known scientist, he is .

implies that well-known scientists are surprisingly humble.

Just as:

Being a frog, he has webbed feet

implies that frogs have webbed feet.

I must have missed a point somewhere, again.

I understand your point, TT.

But imagine that we are reading an article about a certain famous scientist:

--The interview took place in his house........He kindly prepared hot tea and........What I admire most about him is that being a well-known scientists, he's surprisingly humble.

I suppose in this case, we won't read it as a trait of all famous scientists, but rather a virtue he possesses.
I understand your point, TT.

But imagine that we are reading an article about a certain famous scientist:

--The interview took place in his house........He kindly prepared hot tea and........What I admire most about him is that being a well-known scientists, he's surprisingly humble.

I suppose in this case, we won't read it as a trait of all famous scientists, but rather a virtue he possesses.

Nichec, your suggestion makes perfect sense, if only you add something to it to make the contrast. Otherwise, it's the same as before.

What I admire most about him is that despite being a well-known scientist, he's surprisingly humble.
Nichec, your suggestion makes perfect sense, if only you add something to it to make the contrast. Otherwise, it's the same as before.

What I admire most about him is that despite being a well-known scientist, he's surprisingly humble.

Okay, I am not trying to be fussy here, but what about:

--.........He's surprisingly humble, being a well-known scientist as he is.

The effect is still there?
Okay, I am not trying to be fussy here, but what about:

--.........He's surprisingly humble, being a well-known scientist as he is.

The effect is still there?
We've gone full circle. To me the normal way of saying this in BE is:

For a well-known scientist, he is surprisingly humble.
Back
Top Bottom