VOOZH about

URL: https://itsfoss.com/news/ubuntu-flavor-drops-flatpak/

⇱ Snapped! Ubuntu Cracks Down on Default Flatpak Support for its Flavors


👁 Ghostboard pixel

Snapped! Ubuntu Cracks Down on Default Flatpak Support for its Flavors

Ubuntu flavors will no longer include Flatpak support out-of-the-box. Why is that? Let's find out.
Ankush Das
3 min read

Canonical has been pushing Snaps for Ubuntu. Some love it, and some hate it.

However, some of its Ubuntu flavors, like Ubuntu MATE, included Flatpak support by default.

Not to forget, this was one of the factors that gave Flatpak an edge over Snap.

Unfortunately, that is going to change with Canonical's recent announcement:

Ubuntu flavors will no longer offer Flatpak support out of the box. The change will occur with the next release, i.e., Ubuntu 23.04 (Lunar Lobster).

Fret not; Flatpak can still be manually installed if the user requires it, as usual.

📦 Why Drop The Flatpak Support?

The announcement explains the reasoning behind the decision as follows:

When a new packaging technology is provided by default, there is an expectation that the distribution provides community support and is invested in contributing to development to resolve issues. This creates fragmentation instead of focusing on improving the technologies chosen for the distribution.
To maintain this focus while also providing user choice, Ubuntu and its flavors consider debs and snaps the default experience. Users have the freedom of choice to get their software from other sources, including Flatpak. A way to install these alternatives is, and will continue to be, available for installation from the Ubuntu archive with a simple command.

📜 Canonical wants to promote Snap packaging technology and take more control over the flavors to provide a better user experience potentially.

That's obvious. 😎 (or maybe not?)

They want to provide a consistent experience across all the Ubuntu flavors. To do that, one thing to ensure is that the default packaging format enables a secure and stable experience.

It could make sense for some. But then, what is the point of having Ubuntu flavors?

Not to forget, Flatpak is enabled on so many Linux distributions now. But, it does not seem to be a big problem anywhere else on the user end.

Suggested Read 📖

💭 Thoughts on Ubuntu Flavors

For the first part, what technical benefit does this decision provide to the Ubuntu flavors? It would be immensely useful if they addressed more about it in the announcement.

If enabling Flatpak out-of-the-box was a bad idea, why did some Ubuntu flavors decide to include it in the first place? The developers involved with the flavors realized many users prefer Flatpak, and enabling them by default gives users more choices to get started.

I guess that would be a sane conclusion, or maybe they were experimenting?

Moreover, considering that Canonical wants to streamline the experience across its flavors.

Does that mean we might soon see more changes to Ubuntu flavors removed/tweaked to improve the out-of-the-box experience? 😰

💬 What do you think of this change to Ubuntu flavors going forward? Is this enough reason to look for alternatives like Linux Mint and Pop!_OS? Share your thoughts in the comments down below.

Suggested Read 📖

About the author

Ankush Das

A passionate technophile who also happens to be a Computer Science graduate. You will usually see cats dancing to the beautiful tunes sung by him.

Read next

You Can Spend Up to $11,944 on Purism's Librem 16 Linux Laptop

Linux Users Get This For Free! Brave Origin Costs $59.99 For Everyone Else

PINE64's Smart Speaker is a Home Assistant Powered Alternative to Amazon Echo

No More Reboots During Kernel Patching for ARM64 Systems on Ubuntu

ArmSoM Sige6 is The First Sige Board to Ditch Rockchip For Allwinner

Become a Better Linux User

With the FOSS Weekly Newsletter, you learn useful Linux tips, discover applications, explore new distros and stay updated with the latest from Linux world

👁 itsfoss happy penguin