Hi!
> I disagree. These changes are perfectly valid as rfc and should be
> proposed as any other changes.
>
By this principle, everything in PHP introduced since we have the wiki
should live under rfc namespace, since it was a change which has to be
proposed as an RFC. I think such usage of rfc namespace makes it useless
as it would mix pages pertaining to the rfc process as such (proposing
the change, discussing it, etc.) with pages used to document various things.
> It can be one of the new things for 6, maybe the 1st one to begin with.
That's why we need a namespace for new things for 6. And phpng is as
good name as any :)
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
