VOOZH about

URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31677530/

⇱ The ethical, legal and social implications of using artificial intelligence systems in breast cancer care - PubMed


Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable.
Skip to main page content
👁 Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

👁 Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Abstract

Breast cancer care is a leading area for development of artificial intelligence (AI), with applications including screening and diagnosis, risk calculation, prognostication and clinical decision-support, management planning, and precision medicine. We review the ethical, legal and social implications of these developments. We consider the values encoded in algorithms, the need to evaluate outcomes, and issues of bias and transferability, data ownership, confidentiality and consent, and legal, moral and professional responsibility. We consider potential effects for patients, including on trust in healthcare, and provide some social science explanations for the apparent rush to implement AI solutions. We conclude by anticipating future directions for AI in breast cancer care. Stakeholders in healthcare AI should acknowledge that their enterprise is an ethical, legal and social challenge, not just a technical challenge. Taking these challenges seriously will require broad engagement, imposition of conditions on implementation, and pre-emptive systems of oversight to ensure that development does not run ahead of evaluation and deliberation. Once artificial intelligence becomes institutionalised, it may be difficult to reverse: a proactive role for government, regulators and professional groups will help ensure introduction in robust research contexts, and the development of a sound evidence base regarding real-world effectiveness. Detailed public discussion is required to consider what kind of AI is acceptable rather than simply accepting what is offered, thus optimising outcomes for health systems, professionals, society and those receiving care.

Keywords: AI (Artificial Intelligence); Breast carcinoma; Ethical Issues; Social values; Technology Assessment, Biomedical.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

👁 Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The change from ‘old AI’ to ‘new AI’ (dates are approximate).
👁 Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Drivers, potential risks, possible solutions and desired outcomes.

References

    1. Digital Mammography DREAM Challenge Sage bionetworks. 2019. https://www.synapse.org/#!Synapse:syn4224222/wiki/401745 [cited 2019 5th Feb]. Available from:
    1. IBM and sage bionetworks announce winners of first phase of DREAM digital mammography challenge. https://sagebionetworks.org/in-the-news/ibm-and-sage-bionetworks-announc... [updated June 2]
    1. No author. DeepMind Technologies Limited; 2019. Cancer research UK imperial Centre, OPTIMAM and the jikei university hospital.https://deepmind.com/applied/deepmind-health/working-partners/health-res...
    1. Berggruen Institute . 2019 June 20. Keynote: AI Ethics and governance.https://www.berggruen.org/activity/global-artificial-intelligence-techno...
    1. Tegmark M. Penguin Random House; UK: 2017. Life 3.0.
Cite

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.