VOOZH about

URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32473953/

⇱ Diagnostic performance of seven rapid IgG/IgM antibody tests and the Euroimmun IgA/IgG ELISA in COVID-19 patients - PubMed


Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable.
Skip to main page content
👁 Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

👁 Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of seven rapid IgG/IgM tests and the Euroimmun IgA/IgG ELISA for antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in COVID-19 patients.

Methods: Specificity was evaluated in 103 samples collected before January 2020. Sensitivity and time to seropositivity was evaluated in 167 samples from 94 patients with COVID-19 confirmed with RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swab.

Results: Specificity (confidence interval) of lateral flow assays (LFAs) was ≥91.3% (84.0-95.5) for IgM, ≥90.3% (82.9-94.8) for IgG, and ≥85.4% (77.2-91.1) for the combination IgM OR IgG. Specificity of the ELISA was 96.1% (90.1-98.8) for IgG and only 73.8% (64.5-81.4) for IgA. Sensitivity 14-25 days after the onset of symptoms was between ≥92.1% (78.5-98.0) and 100% (95.7-100) for IgG LFA compared to 89.5% (75.3-96.4) for IgG ELISA. Positivity of IgM OR IgG for LFA resulted in a decrease in specificity compared to IgG alone without a gain in diagnostic performance, except for VivaDiag. The results for IgM varied significantly between the LFAs with an average overall agreement of only 70% compared to 89% for IgG. The average dynamic trend to seropositivity for IgM was not shorter than for IgG. At the time of hospital admission the sensitivity of LFA was <60%.

Conclusions: Sensitivity for the detection of IgG antibodies 14-25 days after the onset of symptoms was ≥92.1% for all seven LFAs compared to 89.5% for the IgG ELISA. The results for IgM varied significantly, and including IgM antibodies in addition to IgG for the interpretation of LFAs did not improve the diagnostic performance.

Keywords: COVID-19; Diagnosis; ELISA; Immunoassay; Lateral flow assay; Point-of-care testing; SARS-CoV-2; Sensitivity and specificity; Seroconversion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

👁 Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Dynamic trend to seropositivity for IgM and for IgG for the different assays in 154 samples from 86 patients. This graph represents the cumulative positivity rate after onset of symptoms in patients with COVID-19. Of note, the average time to seroconversion in this figure lags behind the true time of serconversion by a couple of days since patients were not tested daily and a patient is only considered to have seroconverted after the first positive result. Eighteen samples from days 0–4 are included in the analysis, but not shown on the graph.

References

    1. Yang Y., Yang M., Shen C., Wang F., Yuan J., Li J. Evaluating the accuracy of different respiratory specimens in the laboratory diagnosis and monitoring the viral shedding of 2019-nCoV infections. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.02.11.20021493. - DOI
    1. Li Z., Yi Y., Luo X., Xiong N., Liu Y., Li S. Development and clinical application of a rapid IgM–IgG combined antibody test for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis. J Med Virol. 2020 doi: 10.1002/jmv.25727. (Epub ahead of print) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xie J., Ding C., Li J., Wang Y., Guo H., Lu Z. Characteristics of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) confirmed using an IgM–IgG antibody test. J Med Virol. 2020:1–7. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25930. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. To K.K.-W., Tsang O.T.-Y., Leung W.-S., Tam A.R., Wu T.-C., Lung D.C. Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30196-1. (Epub ahead of print) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petherick A. Developing antibody tests for SARS-CoV-2. Lancet. 2020;395:1101–1102. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30788-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Cite

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.