VOOZH about

URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33257555/

⇱ The potential harms of the Tor anonymity network cluster disproportionately in free countries - PubMed


Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable.
Skip to main page content
👁 Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

👁 Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Abstract

The Tor anonymity network allows users to protect their privacy and circumvent censorship restrictions but also shields those distributing child abuse content, selling or buying illicit drugs, or sharing malware online. Using data collected from Tor entry nodes, we provide an estimation of the proportion of Tor network users that likely employ the network in putatively good or bad ways. Overall, on an average country/day, ∼6.7% of Tor network users connect to Onion/Hidden Services that are disproportionately used for illicit purposes. We also show that the likely balance of beneficial and malicious use of Tor is unevenly spread globally and systematically varies based upon a country's political conditions. In particular, using Freedom House's coding and terminological classifications, the proportion of often illicit Onion/Hidden Services use is more prevalent (∼7.8%) in "free" countries than in either "partially free" (∼6.7%) or "not free" regimes (∼4.8%).

Keywords: Dark Web; child abuse; cryptomarkets; political freedom; political rights.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interest.

Figures

👁 Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
More politically “free” countries have higher proportions of Hidden Services traffic than is present in either “partially free” or “not free” nations (n = 195 countries). Each point indicates the average daily %HS for a given country. The white regions represent the kernel density distributions for each ordinal category of political freedom (“free,” “partially free,” and “not free”).
👁 Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Throughout the observed time period (12/31/2018–8/18/2019), “free” countries typically had a higher proportion of Hidden Services traffic than either “partially free” or “not free” nations on a daily basis. The green, cyan, and mauve lines indicate the average daily %HS for “free,” “partially free,” and “not free” countries, respectively (n = 37,922 country-days).
👁 Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Data show a positive association between Freedom House’s political freedom subcategories and average daily %HS. Each graph represents a different aspect of political freedom (the freedom of a country’s “electoral process,” its levels of “political pluralism and participation,” the “functioning of government,” the extent of “freedom of expression and belief,” “associational and organizational rights,” “rule of law,” and “personal autonomy/individual rights”). The same 195 countries (each represented by a point) appear in all seven graph. The blue line in each graph is a linear fitted line for the association between each subcategory of political freedom and %HS.

References

    1. Gehl R. W., Weaving the Dark Web: Legitimacy on Freenet, Tor, and I2P (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2018), pp. 276.
    1. Project T, Users. https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html. Accessed 13 November 2020.
    1. Project T, Onion services. https://metrics.torproject.org/hidserv-dir-onions-seen.html. Accessed 13 November 2020.
    1. Dingledine R., Mathewson N., Syverson P., “Tor: The second-generation onion router” in Proceedings of the 13th conference on USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Association, San Diego, CA, 2004), pp. 21, Vol. 13.
    1. Graham R., Pitman B., Freedom in the wilderness: A study of a darknet space. Convergence 26, 593–619 (2020).

LinkOut - more resources

Cite

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.