VOOZH about

URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42156702/

โ‡ฑ Common Consent Elements for Research Involving Persons with Disorders of Consciousness (CCE-DOC) - PubMed


Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable.
Skip to main page content
๐Ÿ‘ Dot gov

The .gov means itโ€™s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure youโ€™re on a federal government site.

๐Ÿ‘ Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Abstract

Persons with disorders of consciousness (DoC) occupy an ethically charged space in modern medicine and biomedical research. Their decisional capacity is characteristically absent or limited or unpredictably fluctuates, requiring clinicians and investigators to rely on surrogates. Although there is general guidance for informed consent (IC) for research studies, there is no specific guidance for research involving persons with DoC. There are inconsistencies in IC forms for these studies related to explanation of a DoC, evaluation of capacity, description of risks/benefits, and sharing investigational results. This is problematic for persons with DoC, their surrogates, researchers, and institutional review boards (IRBs)/research ethics boards (REBs). To address these issues, the Curing Coma Campaign (CCC) Ethics Workgroup developed the Common Consent Elements for Research Involving Persons with Disorders of Consciousness (CCE-DoC). This practical framework aims to clarify and standardize consent processes in this complex and ethically sensitive research area. Through this structured, adaptable approach, CCE-DoC may have the potential to enhance participant protections, strengthen trust, help families and decision-makers understand studies, reduce duplicative efforts across research groups, and guide investigators and IRBs/REBs in navigating the complex ethical terrain of consent in DoC research. In so doing, CCE-DoC seeks to extend respect for autonomy and trust and promote responsible research urgently needed to advance paradigms of diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment for individuals with disorders of consciousness. The framework offers example language to encourage standardization, while allowing teams flexibility to customize to local needs.

Keywords: Coma; Disorders of consciousness; Ethics; Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: M.J.Y. has received support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) BRAIN Initiative (F32MH123001), the NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1K23NS140495), NIH Common Fundโ€™s Bridge2AI (OT2OD0327), US Department of Defense [Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP) HT9425-1-1081], and the Chen Institute Mass General Neuroscience Transformative Scholar Award. S.L.G. has received research funding from the Brain Canada, the Azrieli Foundation, the Academic Medical Organizations of Southwestern Ontario, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

References

    1. Lewis A, Claassen J, Illes J, et al. Ethics priorities of the curing coma campaign: an empirical survey. Neurocrit Care. 2022;37(1):12โ€“21. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Young MJ, Bodien YG, Giacino JT, et al. The neuroethics of disorders of consciousness: a brief history of evolving ideas. Brain. 2021;144(11):3291โ€“310. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Lewis A, Young MJ, Rohaut B, et al. Ethics along the continuum of research involving persons with disorders of consciousness. Neurocrit Care. 2023;39(3):565โ€“77. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Cutter B. The metaphysical implications of the moral significance of consciousness. Philos Perspect. 2017;31:103โ€“30. - DOI
    1. Kriegel U. The value of consciousness. Analysis. 2019;79(3):503โ€“20. - DOI

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Cite

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.