![]() |
VOOZH | about |
We’re so glad you’re here. You can expect all the best TNS content to arrive Monday through Friday to keep you on top of the news and at the top of your game.
Check your inbox for a confirmation email where you can adjust your preferences and even join additional groups.
Follow TNS on your favorite social media networks.
Become a TNS follower on LinkedIn.
Check out the latest featured and trending stories while you wait for your first TNS newsletter.
The new hotness in AI infrastructure is the AI gateway. These systems are emerging as the critical buffer, a security and load balancing layer between AI applications and external users as well as internal AI modeling teams. The urgency for AI gateways is clear.
As large language models (LLMs), advanced computer vision algorithms, and other machine learning techniques become integral parts of applications, the challenges of their integration and management intensify. AI gateways provide a novel solution to these complexities, providing a centralized point of control for AI workloads.
To make matters more confusing, many AI gateway providers don’t call themselves AI gateways. They may describe themselves as an AI developer portal, AI firewall, AI security, or AI load balancing — all of which contain elements of AI gateways.
Not surprisingly, AI gateways are frequently compared to API gateways. Managing APIs is a critical part of AI gateways, which are almost always designed to interact with external AI providers such as large clouds or OpenAI. (in fact, some companies that claim they have AI gateway offerings are actually built on API gateways and only add a few plugins tuned for AI).
However, it’s critical to understand the differences between API gateways and AI gateways in order to properly design AI application infrastructure that can handle the requirements of modern application design and deployment.
API gateways act as intermediaries between clients and backend services. They allow application developers, security teams and DevOps or Platform Ops teams to reduce the complexities of managing and deploying APIs in front of applications. API gateways also act as security and load-balancing layers for both protecting an organization’s APIs and for protecting an organization from bad actors looking to exploit external APIs that the organization consumes.
The key functions of API gateways include:
Most organizations today consume AI outputs via a third-party API, either from OpenAI, Hugging Face or one of the cloud hyperscalers. Enterprises that actually build, tune and host their own models also consume them via internal APIs. The AI gateway’s fundamental job is to make it easy for application developers, AI data engineers and operational teams to quickly call up and connect AI APIs to their applications. This works in a similar way to API gateways.
That said, there are critical differences between API and AI gateways. For example, the computing requirements of AI applications are very different from computing requirements of traditional applications. Different hardware is required. Training AI models, tuning AI models, adding additional specialized data to them and querying AI models each might have a different performance, latency or bandwidth requirement.
The inherent parallelism of deep learning or real-time response requirements of inferencing may call for different ways to distribute AI workloads. Measuring how much an AI system is consuming can also require a specialized understanding of tokens and model efficiency.
AI gateways are also expected to monitor inbound prompts for signs of abuse such as prompt injection or model theft. In short, while API gateways are indispensable for traditional applications, they may fall short when handling AI-specific traffic patterns and requirements such as:
Dropping a new technology in front of another new technology always presents risk and challenges. Some organizations have simply elected to avoid the problem by only using a single AI service and managing that single-service API. However, doing this risks AI lock-in and also handicaps teams that might want bespoke functionality in their AI services. Before deciding to test-drive an AI gateway, consider the following:
To be clear, AI gateways are relatively new entrants and will likely evolve considerably over the near term. They also are not AI magic dust that must be applied in every instance. Some AI applications will work perfectly well with traditional API gateways.
For example, if an application is largely consuming from the OpenAI API and is not engaging in extensive tuning or additional training, then their application might have requirements very similar to traditional applications. In that case, paying the extra bit for an AI gateway and adding additional operational complexity might be overkill.
In reality, deployment patterns for AI applications may well contain both API and AI gateways because the two use cases will often coexist and even complement one another.
We are already seeing AI gateway functionality added to existing API gateway products. We also see AI teams deploying NGINX reverse proxies and ingress controllers to provide some governance, load balancing and delivery of AI applications (both training and inference).
In the future, AI gateways will come in many shapes and sizes within existing API gateway products and as standalone kits. In reality, the AI gateway is the logical evolution of the API gateway for the new AI era, just as API gateways evolved from reverse proxies.
Knowing the difference between these two types of gateways clarifies why they are both necessary and how they should be used, even if they live side by side as related or dependent applications or microservices.