![]() |
VOOZH | about |
We’re so glad you’re here. You can expect all the best TNS content to arrive Monday through Friday to keep you on top of the news and at the top of your game.
Check your inbox for a confirmation email where you can adjust your preferences and even join additional groups.
Follow TNS on your favorite social media networks.
Become a TNS follower on LinkedIn.
Check out the latest featured and trending stories while you wait for your first TNS newsletter.
At what point should a cloud services provider assume responsibility for the actions of its users? In the U.S., internet service providers are protected under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) from liability that may occur from their users’ online statements. But even if a company’s hands-off policy is protected legally, hosting controversial material may end up impacting its reputation, not to mention its revenue stream.
Popular caching provider Cloudflare is coming under increasing criticism for supporting Kiwi Farms, a malicious American far-right internet forum dedicated to mocking and harassing online figures, notably those in the trans and the LGBTQ community. One of those harassed has been Liz-Fong Jones, a respected engineer in the cloud native computing community, who has shared her frustrations with Cloudflare in a series of live Twitch videos. Cloudflare offers both caching and denial-of-service prevention services to Kiwi. (Disclosure: Cloudflare has also hosted sites that illegally repost copyrighted material from TNS.)
In these videos, she accuses Cloudflare of disrupting her own life, and those of many others, by willfully ignoring complaints submitted to Cloudflare about the many forms of harassment coming from Kiwi Farms, which she described as “a watering hole for sadistic individuals who wants to get reactions out of marginalized people.” The attacks are not merely verbal, as vicious as they are, but also often use personal identifying data to harass individuals with unwanted food delivery orders and even police calls to the victim’s house. This has sparked, in some cases, traumatic responses.
There is no business case to continue to provide services to KiwiFarms. It is an explicitly political decision, and one that should be seen as a moral stain on the industry.https://t.co/dARZKlQe0e
— Emily G (@EmilyGorcenski) August 23, 2022
Cloudflare has not responded to our inquiry as of the deadline time of this post. But the company executives have responded in the past that they see Cloudflare as a champion of internet equality — that everyone should be allowed a forum online, where issues can be debated.
“I’m almost a free-speech absolutist,” Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince had told Ars Technica, explaining his Libertarian-based reluctance to drop its support for its most infamous customer, the neo-Nazi site the Daily Stormer (which the company eventually did amidst public outcry).
But Fong-Jones argues that in cases like Kiwi Farms, such equality is anything but equal, as people must defend themselves from large-scale attacks, ones they had no interest in participating in.
“If you’re working at Cloudflare, this is what the outcome of your technical work is: You are holding up a system that is designed to, by policy, harm marginalized groups.” — @lizthegrey on @Cloudflare‘s support of KiwiFarms. https://t.co/byqydu9WVA #DropKiwifarms
— Joab Jackson (@Joab_Jackson) August 25, 2022
And, as Fong-Jones has pointed out, there is no government mandate that everyone must have access to a caching service. It is entirely Cloudflare’s choice to choose to do business with Kiwi Farms. “Cloudflare is not a monopoly,” she said. “It has competition. If Cloudflare chooses not to do business with a particular origin server, that origin server can choose to do business with other providers.”
It appears Fong-Jones will continue her campaign as long as Cloudflare supports the online forum. She plans to release another livestream/video, on Friday, 6 p.m. PT, that will offer plans on how other customers to move off Cloudflare service. The idea is to “hit Cloudflare in the pocketbook, where it hurts,” Fong-Jones said.
And if this issue continues to gain attention in the public eye, it won’t be Cloudflare’s problem alone but Cloudflare’s other customers as well, who may have to explain why they continue to use the service.
when you have a “garbage in” problem, the correct solution is not to make the garbage inalterable via an append-only database
— cathode ray theory (@said_mitch) August 22, 2022
CDC says you can use log4j again.
— Vicki (@vboykis) August 11, 2022