 |
VOOZH | about |
|
VOOZH | about |
We’re so glad you’re here. You can expect all the best TNS content to arrive Monday through Friday to keep you on top of the news and at the top of your game.
Check your inbox for a confirmation email where you can adjust your preferences and even join additional groups.
Follow TNS on your favorite social media networks.
Become a TNS follower on LinkedIn.
Check out the latest featured and trending stories while you wait for your first TNS newsletter.
Enough is enough. Daniel Stenberg, lead developer and founder of cURL, the popular, open source internet file transfer protocol, is closing down cURL’s bug bounty program at the end of January.
Why? Because cURL’s maintainers are being buried in AI slop. In an interview conducted over Mastodon, Stenberg told The New Stack, “It is our attempt to remove the incentives for submitting made-up lies. The submission quality has plummeted; not only are lots of the submissions plain slop, but the ones that aren’t obviously AI also seem to a high degree be worse (possibly because they, too, are AI but just hidden better). We need to do something to prevent us from drowning.”
He’s not the only one who’s sick and tired of AI slop bug reports. Viktor Petersson, founder of sbomify and co-founder of Screenly, was the first person to spread the news of cURL’s change in a LinkedIn post, wrote, “We at Screenly are probably only seeing a fraction of the amount that curl gets, but the amount of AI slop that the bug bounty is very taxing on human reviewers.” Amen.
Stenberg continued, “The plan is to close it down [at the] end of January, so there will be more messaging about it from the project probably next week. It also times nicely with my talk about open source security and AI on FOSDEM that weekend.”
This move comes as no surprise. Stenberg has been the most vocal opponent of indiscriminate use of AI bug reports for some time now. In May 2025, he had complained about a flood of “AI slop” bug reports from the bug bounty site HackerOne. He’d said, on LinkedIn, “We now ban every reporter INSTANTLY who submits reports we deem AI slop. A threshold has been reached. We are effectively being DDoSed. If we could, we would charge them for this waste of our time. We still have not seen a single valid security report done with AI help.”
That’s not to say, however, that Stenberg rejects using AI to find bugs. He doesn’t. In September 2025, for example, he praised Joshua Rogers on Mastodon for sending “us a *massive* list of potential issues in #curl that he found using his set of AI-assisted tools. Code analyzer style nits all over. Mostly smaller bugs, but still bugs, and there could be one or two actual security flaws in there. Actually, truly awesome findings.”
You see, Stenberg’s problem isn’t with AI per se; it’s how lazy people are using AI thoughtlessly to look for a bounty check or a reputation as a security researcher.
Mind you, if you do find an honest-to-goodness bug, with or without AI help, the cURL maintainers still want to know about it. But, if you do use AI, you must follow cURL’s AI usage rules. That is not optional. If you don’t obey them, you won’t be contributing to cURL. Considering how buried the cURL maintainers are by AI slop, it’s not like you can blame them for taking such a strict stance. I would too in their shoes.
