![]() |
VOOZH | about |
We’re so glad you’re here. You can expect all the best TNS content to arrive Monday through Friday to keep you on top of the news and at the top of your game.
Check your inbox for a confirmation email where you can adjust your preferences and even join additional groups.
Follow TNS on your favorite social media networks.
Become a TNS follower on LinkedIn.
Check out the latest featured and trending stories while you wait for your first TNS newsletter.
The arguments over how to open source AI and large language models (LLM) continue. In the latest development, the Linux Foundation has adopted the Open Model Initiative (OMI) and its efforts to keep once-open source LLMs open.
If that sounds familiar, it should. We’ve seen many open source programs lose their open source status when their corporate overlords decide it’s more profitable to use a proprietary model.
The OMI founders, CivitAI, ComfyOrg and Invoke, faced a similar situation. In the OMI’s launch document, the group stated that recent image and video models were released under restrictive, non-commercial license agreements, which limit the ownership of novel intellectual property and offer compromised capabilities that are unresponsive to community needs.
Invoke CEO Kent Keirsey emailed me that “the AI industry has recently trended towards more restrictive licensing for new foundation models. While some allow free, non-commercial use, there’s a growing need for truly open, permissively licensed models. This is crucial not just for enterprises but for creatives and innovators across all sectors. The Open Model Initiative aims to ensure a future where individuals and organizations can harness AI’s creative potential while preserving ownership over their intellectual property.”
Who specifically is doing this? The OMI doesn’t spell it out. SiliconAngle, however, reported the organization was founded in response to Stability AI’s recent licensing change for its popular image-generation model, Stable Diffusion 3 (SD3). That model had been entirely free and open, but the changes introduced a monthly fee structure and imposed usage limitations.
The OMI’s top goal is to create a community-driven effort to promote the development and adoption of openly licensed AI models for image, video and audio generation. This, in my interpretation, means the OMI wishes to:
That’s a big job. Heck, it’s an enormous job. So, the OMI has become a Linux Foundation organization. Jim Zemlin, the Linux Foundation‘s executive director, said in a statement, “With the Open Model Initiative, we are taking a significant step towards making AI accessible and beneficial for everyone, building an environment where creativity and progress in AI can thrive without barriers.”
At this early stage of the game, the OMI is working on establishing a governance framework and working groups for collaborative community development. It’s also planning on conducting surveys to gather feedback on what an open source LLM should look like.
The long-established Open Source Initiative (OSI), on the other hand, is working out what an open source AI code license should look like. The OSI plans to issue the 1.0 version of its library at the All Things Open convention in late October. OMI is far from ready to do that. Nonetheless, OMI plans to release an alpha version of its model by year’s end.
Come that day, Keirsey said, “Through OMI’s commitment to open source development under the Linux Foundation, we believe the collective will deliver high-quality, competitive models with open licenses that push AI creativity forward, are free to use and meet the needs of the community.”
Sounds interesting? Come on board. The OMI invites individuals and organizations that are passionate about open source and AI to join in. Opportunities for involvement include joining working groups and contributing to developing open AI models. You can engage with the OMI through Discord and GitHub.