![]() |
VOOZH | about |
We’re so glad you’re here. You can expect all the best TNS content to arrive Monday through Friday to keep you on top of the news and at the top of your game.
Check your inbox for a confirmation email where you can adjust your preferences and even join additional groups.
Follow TNS on your favorite social media networks.
Become a TNS follower on LinkedIn.
Check out the latest featured and trending stories while you wait for your first TNS newsletter.
Terraform modules encapsulate complex configurations into reusable, manageable components. Many teams use these modules to streamline infrastructure management, significantly boosting productivity.
By using prebuilt modules as templates, teams avoid the repetitive task of writing infrastructure code from scratch for each new project, allowing them to focus more on developing the application itself. This practice enhances consistency and reduces the likelihood of errors by reusing proven configurations across different environments.
However, many teams use Terraform modules in a way that misses their full potential and leads to maintenance challenges and inconsistencies. Let’s look at two common practices, their challenges and the changes teams can make to harness the full power of Terraform modules.
Using prebuilt templates for new projects is appealing for quick setups. Tools like Backstage offer catalogs of starter projects, providing predefined configurations that are often composed of Terraform modules. However, these templates are usually rigid, covering general use cases rather than the specific needs of evolving projects. As project requirements change, maintaining and updating these modules becomes increasingly complex. Developers must manually modify configurations, which leads to inconsistencies and versioning issues, and results in outdated or insecure setups.
Many teams have a single comprehensive Terraform project that defines the entire infrastructure setup of their application. This creates a tight coupling that leads to a complex deployment pipeline, where any infrastructure change requires a full redeployment. Such tight coupling creates dependencies that can slow down the release pipeline and make infrastructure changes difficult to manage efficiently.
The reliance on rigid templates and the tight coupling between application code and infrastructure configurations keep teams from fully leveraging Terraform modules in modern infrastructure management.
To overcome these challenges, teams should shift their perspective to build a true platform. Instead of using static code snippets and comprehensive Infrastructure as Code to manage manually, teams should focus on dynamic, reusable components. This is made feasible by introducing a framework capable of orchestrating the linkage of Terraform modules to application requirements in an automated way.
Infrastructure from Code (IfC) is a new paradigm that helps teams achieve modularization; it complements Terraform by offering an intelligent framework that automates infrastructure provisioning based on application requirements. By dynamically identifying and applying modules as needed, IfC serves as the vital link between your decoupled IaC project and your application code.
Let’s take the open source Nitric framework as an example. Instead of manually updating infrastructure, Nitric’s IfC automatically generates a requirements specification. This specification details the resources used by the application, their hierarchy and their intended runtime usage. The framework then translates this specification into plug-ins that are compatible with IaC solutions like Terraform modules, which handle the provisioning of resources, roles and permissions.
With this method, applications stay synchronized with their infrastructure, ensuring only necessary resources and permissions are provisioned.
As described above, traditional deployment workflows often involve tightly coupled application code and Infrastructure as Code projects (e.g., Terraform). The diagrams below illustrate the transformation from a traditional workflow to an IfC-enhanced deployment workflow.
This approach has several challenges:
By adding IfC to the deployment workflow, teams streamline and automate their process.
DevOps can work in parallel rather than as a blocker to the above flow:
4. DevOps: These teams are freed from the workflow of a single application and are able to focus on platform specific activities such as building and maintaining IaC modules (Terraform, in most cases), which adhere to the governance standards of their organization.
This approach offers several benefits:
Terraform modules have transformed infrastructure management by enabling reusability and consistency. However, the reliance on rigid templates and the tight coupling between application code and infrastructure configurations present significant challenges.
IfC frameworks transform platform engineering by automating infrastructure provisioning based on application requirements, fostering better resource management and improving the efficiency and scalability of deployment pipelines.
I encourage you to explore this approach to see how it can reduce manual coordination, minimize errors and accelerate release cycles — ultimately bridging the gap between development and operations, and empowering teams to focus more on innovation and application development. Embrace Infrastructure from Code (IfC) to transform your Terraform practices and unlock the full potential of your platform.