 |
VOOZH | about |
|
VOOZH | about |
We’re so glad you’re here. You can expect all the best TNS content to arrive Monday through Friday to keep you on top of the news and at the top of your game.
Check your inbox for a confirmation email where you can adjust your preferences and even join additional groups.
Follow TNS on your favorite social media networks.
Become a TNS follower on LinkedIn.
Check out the latest featured and trending stories while you wait for your first TNS newsletter.
After a four-year hiatus, the “International Obfuscated C Code Contest” is making its glorious return in 2025.
The goals of the IOCCC:
As the fun ramps up again, the judges will begin accepting wonderful new “obfuscated C” programs starting on January 31 (with their window closing on April 1 — April Fool’s Day). But they’ve also spent the last four years massively updating the contest’s website — so even winning entries archived from the past 40 years now possess “the ability of reasonable modern Unix/Linux systems to be able to compile and even run them.”
An updated FAQ acknowledges that, rather than keeping that code obfuscated, the site “has shifted to a more educational theme.”
Maybe the organizers are finally recognizing their own status as a cultural icon — their ongoing role of inspiring young coders with examples of incredible complexity and creativity, while also bearing witness to their own bits of programming history.
Although, in the true spirit of the competition, sometimes they seem to be making things up as they go along.
Screenshot from the GitHub profile of IOCCC co-founder Landon Curt Noll
The playfulness seems to be everywhere — and it ultimately becomes contagious. “Over the years, more than one IOCCC judge has been known to bribe another IOCCC judge into voting for a winning entry by offering a bit of high-quality chocolate,” noted the official guidelines. So one 2012 entry demonstrated its steganography application — hiding source code within an image — by using a photo of some luscious chocolates.
Rule 26 of the official rules consists of nothing but nonsense sentences using all 26 letters of the alphabet exactly once. Meanwhile, the contest’s official FAQ offers cheeky answers to questions like why they’re on Mastodon. “The IOCCC no longer uses Twitter, or whatever that someone who appears to have poor impulse control (allegedly) calls their platform these days. The IOCCC prefers to reside in the fediverse.”
And how did the contest start? “It was a dark and stormy night…”
The contest began on March 23, 1984, when a 23-year-old Landon Curt Noll was working with Larry Bassel at the National Semiconductor, porting UNIX onto the company’s microcontrollers. Bassel was wrestling with a bug in the Bourne shell, while Noll was working on a version of the finger command from early BSD. Soon they’d announced a contest “to compete with the worst C hackers around,” and the first entries started pouring in.
“When we began to receive messages from outside of the U.S., Larry and I decided to include International in the name,” Noll wrote in the FAQ.
👁 Screenshot of home page for 'Obfuscated C Competition' contributor Oscar Toledo G
Even in that first year, they saw entries from some of the big names in the coding world, including Bell Labs programmer David Korn, creator of the Korn shell (1987), and Perl programming language creator Larry Wall (1986, 1987). It set a high bar that continued as the contest rolled along.
Over the last 40 years, its judges have recognized 197 different winners. And several of them have their own Wikipedia entries:
There are also several noted CS academics, including David Applegate, Lennart Augustsson, Daniel J. Bernstein, Vern Paxson, Diomidis Spinellis, and John Tromp.
And the guidelines even include a special rule directed specifically at Peter Honeyman, a professor emeritus at the University of Michigan:
“Some people, in the past, have attempted to obfuscate their identity by including comments of famous Internet personalities such as Peter Honeyman. The judges are on to this trick and therefore consider any obfuscated source or data file claiming to be from Honeyman to not be from Honeyman.”
The message seems to be that gloriously obfuscated C code should also be anonymous obfuscated C code — at least until the judging is finished. And this led to a funny and remarkable coincidence for one winning entry from 1990. The judges’ remarks grasped that the ANSI C standard now included three-character “trigraphs,” which “has made it easier to make programs hard to read.” So they created a special award for programmer Larry Jones, recognizing him for crafting 46 undulating lines of C code clogged with dozens of the three-character abominations (mostly question marks).
👁 Some code from Larry Jones winning entry in Obfuscated C Code Competition (1990)
After receiving his award for the “ANSI Committee’s worst abuse of C,” Jones contacted the judges with a simple question: “Were you aware that I am a member of the committee?”
The judges assured him it was a coincidence, and Jones added that he was “quite grateful” for the award. Although he “was really hoping for something more along the lines of ‘Closest Resemblance to Line Noise.'”
But mixed in with all the hilarity, the Obfuscated C competition still manages to become almost an accidental yearbook of each generation’s programmers, gathering them together in a display of our own collective history. Also contributing was Mary Ann Horton, a BSD contributor described as “a Usenet and internet pioneer” and an early activist for transgender rights. “To have invented the email attachment is one thing,” Horton said in a 2022 biography. “To have done so while transitioning from male to female and paving the way for Trans rights in the workplace is quite another.”
And somewhere in the mix is George Sicherman, whose claim to fame is creating an alternate numbering scheme for dice in 1978, which still produces the same probability distribution as regular dice.
It’s all part of the event’s long and storied history. “We suggest that you avoid trying for the ‘smallest self-replicating’ source,” the guidelines warn — since someone has already won with a 0-byte-sized entry.
But other milestones are just as wacky and unpredictable:
There’s a sense that anything can happen, maybe because the judges really are making things up as they go along. “When the number of submissions thins to about 25 submissions, we begin to form award categories,” explained the official guidelines. So every year the names for the final awards “will vary depending on the types of submissions we receive.”
There’s been some C-specific award categories like “worst abuse of the C preprocessor” and “least likely to compile successfully.” A 2020 entry won an award for “most misleading indentation” for carefully justifying its code to the right margin.
But as the programs got crazier, so did the category names:
What keeps it all going? Where do the judges find the passion to keep poring through piles of obfuscated C code — and for four consecutive decades? What gives all of this craziness its purpose?
Search the web long enough and you’ll find a clue on Landon Curt Noll’s personal website. It includes some very old photos from his time as a cryptologist/number theorist at SGI — and an official picture from when Noll was a city council member for Sunnyvale, California.
But it also offers a glimpse at his unique appreciation for the art of algorithms. “I think of mathematics as both an art as well as a science,” Noll writes.
“Some people, when they doodle while talking on the phone, will draw ‘bunny rabbits.’ I like to doodle equations and plots, usually via the Mathematica tool.”
But the return of the contest is almost like a reunion of long-lost relatives — a kind of geek alternate history that continues on into the future.
And 2025’s new crop of winners will be announced in a uniquely geeky way — by a git push from the judges of a new winners’ directory with an announcement on the new @IOCCC Fostodon feed.
