![]() |
VOOZH | about |
We’re so glad you’re here. You can expect all the best TNS content to arrive Monday through Friday to keep you on top of the news and at the top of your game.
Check your inbox for a confirmation email where you can adjust your preferences and even join additional groups.
Follow TNS on your favorite social media networks.
Become a TNS follower on LinkedIn.
Check out the latest featured and trending stories while you wait for your first TNS newsletter.
The prevalent feature of human innovation is to allow us to mess things up at a larger scale faster than ever before. We can manufacture things with flaws faster. We can drive cars faster. We can lay waste to entire natural ecosystems within minutes. We can crash the financial stability of the world with a tweet. We can eradicate every living thing on the face of the planet with the push of a few buttons.
This understanding is critical to coming to grips with the potential for disaster that the fervor behind the use of newer AI projects has. We are still (hopefully) a generation away from achieving true consciousness with AI. However, the foundational elements for that consciousness are being developed now. The main cause for concern is that these elements are currently *rife* with bias and error. For example, facial recognition can’t distinguish between people of color. Generative imaging AI creates inappropriate outputs when no inputs of such were part of the data set. Large language models (LLMs) will make up answers, called “hallucinations,” or produce results that contain known errors.
Aside from flaws in the technology itself, we are not always using the technology in a safe way. Users are entering sensitive data either in their queries or into the data set. Users are already relying on AI to produce answers that they don’t have the experience to vet. Some parties are creating deep fakes to assist them in disinformation campaigns. Others are using deep fakes to exploit people’s likenesses without their knowledge or consent. AND, because of the developmental momentum of these technologies, organizations are prioritizing the increasing adoption and monetization of AI rather than solving these issues first.
We don’t have a grasp on the long-term effects of use of AI on society or the world around us. We haven’t standardized any sort of governance to provide guardrails around the creation and use of these technologies. We don’t have transparency into how some of these AI models make decisions. We haven’t done significant research into the ecological effects of increased storage and compute needs of growing and more computationally complex data sets. We don’t have regulations around the inclusion of protected property in AI results. We haven’t resolved issues of liability for the misuse of AI or hallucinated results. We are barreling into a blind corner when it comes to the long-term effects and outcomes of our current efforts with AI. If we do not apply the brakes soon enough, we may be seeing the bottom of a chasm before building those guardrails!
With all these valid concerns in mind, AI is being adopted in more and more areas and products, and that’s unlikely to change. There are several large tech companies with competing projects and products, each vying to be the AI of choice. Try as we might, we cannot resist the current of dollars flowing into AI. However, we can ride that current through thoughtful selection and use of AI in our practices and products. To assist our navigation, here are some considerations for your practice and use of AI that should help you navigate these waters safely:
AI is here to stay, and it’s up to us to make sure it is incorporated into our world in a safe, ethical and sustainable way.