 |
VOOZH | about |
|
VOOZH | about |
We’re so glad you’re here. You can expect all the best TNS content to arrive Monday through Friday to keep you on top of the news and at the top of your game.
Check your inbox for a confirmation email where you can adjust your preferences and even join additional groups.
Follow TNS on your favorite social media networks.
Become a TNS follower on LinkedIn.
Check out the latest featured and trending stories while you wait for your first TNS newsletter.
As generative AI reshapes software development, a critical question has emerged: Will traditional low-code and no-code platforms become obsolete in the face of natural language “vibe coding”?
While some industry voices predict the complete displacement of structured development approaches by AI agents, Pega — a veteran in enterprise software — offers a more nuanced perspective that bridges both worlds.
“There are a lot of people who think everything is going to be agents,” Don Schuerman, CTO and vice president of product marketing, told The New Stack in an interview. “I don’t think those people have ever dealt with the complexity of an actual enterprise IT organization. I think there’s a little bit of naivete there, frankly.”
This observation highlights the tension between the promise of AI-powered development and the practical realities of enterprise software. While tools like Cursor enable developers to build applications through natural language prompts (what some call “vibe coding“), enterprises require additional guardrails that pure AI generation doesn’t inherently provide.
Schuerman listed several enterprise concerns with unfettered AI code generation:
Rather than an either/or proposition between traditional low-code and AI agents, Schuerman said, Pega advocates for what Forrester Research calls “AI application generation” — using AI and natural language to generate structured business assets rather than raw code.
“What we’ve been thinking about is, how do I take the spirit of vibe coding, which is this idea that with these AI tools, I should be able to express in natural business language what it is that I want to accomplish and just have the software begin to pick it up, but do that in a way that puts structural checkpoints along the way that fit into what the enterprise is looking for,” he explained.
Pega’s answer to this challenge is Blueprint, an AI agent-powered workflow design tool that turns natural language descriptions into structured business processes.
During a demonstration of the tool, Schuerman showed how users can:
The result is a blueprint that provides approximately 60-70% of the build completed in a governance-friendly format, Schuerman said.
He also stressed the distinction between different agent roles. Design-time agents should be creative, suggesting improvements and bringing in domain expertise during the design phase. Whereas runtime agents need to strictly follow established workflows when serving users, ensuring compliance and regulatory requirements, he said.
“At design time, I want my agents to be creative. I want them to suggest things I might not have thought of,” Schuerman explained. “When I get to runtime, I don’t want my agents to be creative. I want them doing exactly the workflow that I laid out, and I want them doing it consistently every time, because that’s how I defend myself to my regulators.”
While Schuerman acknowledges that traditional no-code tools may indeed be displaced by AI for simple personal applications — “no-code was always sort of more the personal apps,” he said — he also pushed back strongly against the notion that all enterprise development will follow the same path.
Schuerman said that for regulated industries like banking, healthcare, and government, the ability to show exactly how a process works — not just that “an agent figured it out” — remains essential.
Professional developers won’t be replaced but will see their focus shift. According to Pega, they’ll still be needed for: Building and maintaining data services, developing custom applications and frameworks, creating digital experiences and handling low-level data configuration.
This suggests that AI and low-code platforms will handle more of the business domain implementation, while professional developers focus on infrastructure and specialized needs.
Meanwhile, as AI transforms software development, the enterprise space appears headed toward a hybrid approach — one that embraces the natural language benefits of “vibe coding” while maintaining the structure, security, and governance that businesses require, Schuerman said.
Rather than an AI revolution that sweeps away existing paradigms, we’re witnessing an evolution where AI enhances and accelerates structured development approaches, particularly for complex enterprise needs where auditing and compliance cannot be compromised, he argued.
Thus, this middle path recognizes that while consumer applications may increasingly be built through pure AI generation, enterprise software development must balance innovation with responsibility.
