VOOZH about

URL: https://willitrunai.com/can-run/codegeex-4-9b-on-rx-5700-xt-8gb

⇱ Can CodeGeeX 4 9B Run on RX 5700 XT 8GB? YES (7.8/8.0GB)


Can CodeGeeX 4 9B run on RX 5700 XT 8GB?

YES — With Offload

A80Great
Estimated from fit model

CodeGeeX 4 9B needs ~7.8 GB VRAM. RX 5700 XT 8GB has 8.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~46 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: LowStack: StandardBottleneck: Balanced
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 7.8 GB, 46.4 tok/s, Runs with offload
7.8 GB required8.0 GB available
98% VRAM used

Fit status

Runs with offload

Decode

46.4 tok/s

TTFT

4171 ms

Safe context

21K

Memory

7.8 GB / 8.0 GB

Memory breakdown

Weights5.5 GB
KV Cache0.6 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom0.8 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsCodeGeeX 4 9B on RX 5700 XT 8GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 46.4 tok/s decode · 4.2s TTFT (warm) · 116 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

This setup is broadly balanced for this model.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Best improvement path

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatATight fit46.4 tok/s2275 ms21K
CodingARuns with offload46.4 tok/s4171 ms21K
Agentic CodingARuns with offload (needs ~0.3 GB host RAM)31.3 tok/s8989 ms21K
ReasoningARuns with offload46.4 tok/s4930 ms21K
RAGARuns with offload (needs ~0.3 GB host RAM)31.3 tok/s11236 ms21K

Quantization options

How CodeGeeX 4 9B (9B params) fits at each quantization level on RX 5700 XT 8GB (8.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
3.5 GB
LowA81
Q3_K_S
3
4.4 GB
LowA81
NVFP4Best for your GPU
4
5.0 GB
MediumA81
Q4_K_M
4
5.5 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
6.5 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
7.4 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
9.6 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
18.5 GB
MaximumF0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run CodeGeeX 4 9B on your machine.

Run

docker run --rm -it ghcr.io/ggerganov/llama.cpp:full \ --hf-repo "THUDM/codegeex4-all-9b" \ --hf-file "codegeex4-all-9b-Q4_K_M.gguf" \ -c 4096 -ngl 99

Frequently asked questions

See all results for RX 5700 XT 8GBSee all hardware for CodeGeeX 4 9B