VOOZH about

URL: https://willitrunai.com/can-run/codestral-22b-on-m4-max-64gb


Can Codestral 22B run on MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB?

YES — Runs Great

B59Good
Estimated from fit model

Codestral 22B needs ~23.7 GB VRAM. MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB has 46.1 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~26 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: RoomyBandwidth: MediumStack: StandardBottleneck: Balanced
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 23.7 GB, 37.4 tok/s, Runs well
23.7 GB required46.1 GB available
51% VRAM used

Fit status

Runs well

Decode

37.4 tok/s

TTFT

5174 ms

Safe context

33K

Memory

23.7 GB / 46.1 GB

Memory breakdown

Weights13.4 GB
KV Cache2.4 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom6.9 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsCodestral 22B on MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 37.4 tok/s decode · 5.2s TTFT (warm) · 94 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

This setup is broadly balanced for this model.

Shared-memory contention still exists

The OS, browser, and inference runtime all compete for the same physical memory pool, so real-world headroom is less forgiving than raw capacity suggests.

Best improvement path

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatBRuns well25.6 tok/s4120 ms33K
CodingBRuns well25.6 tok/s7553 ms33K
Agentic CodingBRuns well25.6 tok/s10986 ms33K
ReasoningBRuns well25.6 tok/s8926 ms33K
RAGBRuns well25.6 tok/s13733 ms33K

Quantization options

How Codestral 22B (22B params) fits at each quantization level on MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB (46.1 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
8.6 GB
LowC53
Q3_K_S
3
10.8 GB
LowC53
NVFP4
4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Codestral 22B on your machine.

Run

ollama run codestral

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs Codestral 22B well

👁 NVIDIA
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 48GBBudget pick
1344 GB/s (+798)
B
Raises estimated decode speed by about 130%.85.9 tok/s decode

Raises estimated decode speed by about 130%.

~$4,999 MSRP

👁 NVIDIA
RTX 6000 Ada 48GBBest value
960 GB/s (+414)
B
Raises estimated decode speed by about 60%.59.9 tok/s decode

Raises estimated decode speed by about 60%.

~$6,800 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

See all results for MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GBSee all hardware for Codestral 22B
12.3 GB
Medium
C54
Q4_K_M
4
13.4 GB
MediumC54
Q5_K_M
5
15.8 GB
HighB55
Q6_K
6
18.0 GB
HighB56
Q8_0Best for your GPU
8
23.5 GB
Very HighB58
F16
16
45.1 GB
MaximumF0

Not always. MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB can often fit larger models thanks to unified memory, but a discrete GPU with dedicated high-bandwidth VRAM may still decode faster once the model fits. For this combination, the important distinction is capacity versus sustained throughput.