VOOZH about

URL: https://willitrunai.com/can-run/command-a-111b-on-m2-ultra-64gb


Can Command A 111B run on Mac Studio M2 Ultra 64GB?

YES — With Q2_K

A70Great
Estimated from fit model

Command A 111B needs ~55.0 GB VRAM. Mac Studio M2 Ultra 64GB has 46.1 GB. With Q2_K quantization, expect ~8 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: HighStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Command A 111B at Q4_K_M needs 79.4 GB — too much for Mac Studio M2 Ultra 64GB (46.1 GB). Runs at Q2_K (55.0 GB) with low quality.
Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 79.4 GB, exceeds 46.1 GB available
79.4 GB required46.1 GB available
172% VRAM needed

33.3 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

3.7 tok/s

TTFT

51700 ms

Safe context

4K

Memory

79.4 GB / 46.1 GB

Offload

40%

Memory breakdown

Weights67.7 GB
KV Cache3.9 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom6.9 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower
See how fast it feelsCommand A 111B on Mac Studio M2 Ultra 64GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 3.7 tok/s decode · 51.7s TTFT (warm) · 9 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 20% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Shared-memory contention still exists

The OS, browser, and inference runtime all compete for the same physical memory pool, so real-world headroom is less forgiving than raw capacity suggests.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Increase host RAM if you keep offloading

This setup may need roughly 7.0 GB of extra host RAM just for the offloaded portion, before OS and other tools.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatFToo heavy3.5 tok/s29949 ms4K
CodingFToo heavy3.4 tok/s56439 ms4K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy3.3 tok/s86539 ms4K
ReasoningFToo heavy3.4 tok/s66701 ms4K
RAGFToo heavy3.3 tok/s108173 ms4K

Quantization options

How Command A 111B (111B params) fits at each quantization level on Mac Studio M2 Ultra 64GB (46.1 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
43.3 GB
LowF0
Q3_K_S
3
54.4 GB
LowF0
NVFP4
4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Command A 111B on your machine.

Run

ollama run command-a

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs Command A 111B well

MacBook Pro M3 Max 128GBBudget pick
128 GB Unified (+64)
A
Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.3.9 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$2,499 MSRP

MacBook Pro M4 Max 96GBBest value
96 GB Unified (+32)
A
Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.7.4 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Raises estimated decode speed by about 100%.

~$2,499 MSRP

Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GBApple upgrade
128 GB Unified (+64)
S
Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.7.5 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$3,999 MSRP

AMD Instinct MI300A 128GBBiggest leap
128 GB VRAM (+64)5300 GB/s (+4500)
S
Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.59.8 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$12,000 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

See all results for Mac Studio M2 Ultra 64GBSee all hardware for Command A 111B
62.2 GB
Medium
F0
Q4_K_M
4
67.7 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
79.9 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
91.0 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
118.8 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
227.6 GB
MaximumF0