VOOZH about

URL: https://willitrunai.com/can-run/command-r-plus-104b-on-m4-pro-64gb


Can Command R+ 104B run on MacBook Pro M4 Pro 64GB?

YES — With Q2_K

C53Usable
Estimated — low-sample bucket· few comparable runs

Command R+ 104B needs ~51.8 GB VRAM. MacBook Pro M4 Pro 64GB has 46.1 GB. With Q2_K quantization, expect ~7 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: LowStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Command R+ 104B at Q4_K_M needs 74.7 GB — too much for MacBook Pro M4 Pro 64GB (46.1 GB). Runs at Q2_K (51.8 GB) with low quality.
Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 74.7 GB, exceeds 46.1 GB available
74.7 GB required46.1 GB available
162% VRAM needed

28.6 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

3.5 tok/s

TTFT

55679 ms

Safe context

4K

Memory

74.7 GB / 46.1 GB

Offload

40%

Memory breakdown

Weights63.4 GB
KV Cache3.4 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom6.9 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower
See how fast it feelsCommand R+ 104B on MacBook Pro M4 Pro 64GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Solve: If a train travels at 60 mph for 2.5 hours, how far does it go?
Let me work through this step by step. Given information: - Speed = 60 mph (miles per hour) - Time = 2.5 hours Formula: Distance = Speed x Time Calculation: Distance = 60 mph x 2.5 h = 150 miles The train travels 150 miles. Double-check: at 60 mph the train covers 60 miles each hour. In half an hour it covers 30 miles. So in 2.5 hours: 60 + 60 + 30 = 150 miles. Confirmed.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>What if the train stops for 20 minutes halfway?
The stop doesn't change the total distance covered while moving, but it affects total trip time. Breakdown: - First half: 1.25 hours at 60 mph = 75 miles - Stop: 20 minutes (no distance) - Second half: 1.25 hours at 60 mph = 75 miles Total distance: 150 miles (same) Total time: 2.5 h + 0.33 h = 2.83 hours Average speed: 150 / 2.83 = 53 mph The distance stays the same but average speed drops to 53 mph because of the stop.
Estimated: 3.5 tok/s decode · 55.7s TTFT (warm) · 9 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Shared-memory contention still exists

The OS, browser, and inference runtime all compete for the same physical memory pool, so real-world headroom is less forgiving than raw capacity suggests.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Increase host RAM if you keep offloading

This setup may need roughly 4.5 GB of extra host RAM just for the offloaded portion, before OS and other tools.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatFToo heavy3.6 tok/s29594 ms4K
CodingFToo heavy3.5 tok/s55679 ms4K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy3.3 tok/s85117 ms4K
ReasoningFToo heavy3.5 tok/s65803 ms4K
RAGFToo heavy3.3 tok/s106396 ms4K

Quantization options

How Command R+ 104B (104B params) fits at each quantization level on MacBook Pro M4 Pro 64GB (46.1 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
40.6 GB
LowF0
Q3_K_S
3
51.0 GB
LowF0
NVFP4
4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Command R+ 104B on your machine.

Run

ollama run command-r-plus

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs Command R+ 104B well

MacBook Pro M3 Max 128GBBudget pick
128 GB Unified (+64)400 GB/s (+127)
B
Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.4.1 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$2,499 MSRP

MacBook Pro M4 Max 96GBBest value
96 GB Unified (+32)546 GB/s (+273)
C
Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.8.5 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Raises estimated decode speed by about 143%.

~$2,499 MSRP

MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GBApple upgrade
96 GB Unified (+32)400 GB/s (+127)
C
Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.3.3 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.

~$3,199 MSRP

👁 NVIDIA
NVIDIA GH200 96GBBiggest leap
96 GB VRAM (+32)4000 GB/s (+3727)
A
Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.55.5 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$30,000 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

See all results for MacBook Pro M4 Pro 64GBSee all hardware for Command R+ 104B
58.2 GB
Medium
F0
Q4_K_M
4
63.4 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
74.9 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
85.3 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
111.3 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
213.2 GB
MaximumF0