VOOZH about

URL: https://willitrunai.com/can-run/devstral-small-2507-on-m3-pro-18gb


Can Devstral Small 1.1 run on MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB?

YES — With Q2_K

A76Great
Estimated from fit model

Devstral Small 1.1 needs ~14.6 GB VRAM. MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB has 13.0 GB. With Q2_K quantization, expect ~9 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: Very lowStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Devstral Small 1.1 at Q4_K_M needs 19.9 GB — too much for MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB (13.0 GB). Runs at Q2_K (14.6 GB) with low quality.
Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 19.9 GB, exceeds 13.0 GB available
19.9 GB required13.0 GB available
153% VRAM needed

6.9 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

4.6 tok/s

TTFT

42343 ms

Safe context

4K

Memory

19.9 GB / 13.0 GB

Offload

30%

Memory breakdown

Weights14.6 GB
KV Cache2.4 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom1.9 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower
See how fast it feelsDevstral Small 1.1 on MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 4.6 tok/s decode · 42.3s TTFT (warm) · 11 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Shared-memory contention still exists

The OS, browser, and inference runtime all compete for the same physical memory pool, so real-world headroom is less forgiving than raw capacity suggests.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Increase host RAM if you keep offloading

This setup may need roughly 1.1 GB of extra host RAM just for the offloaded portion, before OS and other tools.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatFToo heavy4.6 tok/s23104 ms4K
CodingFToo heavy4.3 tok/s45519 ms4K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy3.7 tok/s75317 ms4K
ReasoningFToo heavy4.3 tok/s53795 ms4K
RAGFToo heavy3.7 tok/s94146 ms4K

Quantization options

How Devstral Small 1.1 (24B params) fits at each quantization level on MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB (13.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
9.4 GB
LowF0
Q3_K_S
3
11.8 GB
LowF0
NVFP4
4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Devstral Small 1.1 on your machine.

Run

lms load Devstral-Small-2507 && lms server start

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs Devstral Small 1.1 well

MacBook Pro M4 32GBBudget pick
32 GB Unified (+14)
S
Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.9.5 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$799 MSRP

Mac mini M4 32GBBest value
32 GB Unified (+14)
S
Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.9.5 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$1,099 MSRP

Mac mini M4 64GBApple upgrade
64 GB Unified (+46)
S
Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.9.5 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$1,099 MSRP

👁 NVIDIA
RTX 5090 32GBBiggest leap
32 GB VRAM (+14)1792 GB/s (+1642)
S
Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.62 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$1,999 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

See all results for MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GBSee all hardware for Devstral Small 1.1
13.4 GB
Medium
F0
Q4_K_M
4
14.6 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
17.3 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
19.7 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
25.7 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
49.2 GB
MaximumF0