Can Gemma 4 26B A4B run on MacBook Pro M1 Pro 16GB?

NO — Won't Fit

F0Won't run

○Estimated from fit model

Gemma 4 26B A4B needs ~21.7 GB but MacBook Pro M1 Pro 16GB only has 11.5 GB. Try a smaller quantization or lighter model.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: No fitBandwidth: Very lowStack: StandardBottleneck: Memory capacity

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 21.7 GB, exceeds 11.5 GB available

21.7 GB required11.5 GB available

189% VRAM needed

10.2 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

9.6 tok/s

TTFT

20153 ms

Safe context

Memory

21.7 GB / 11.5 GB

Offload

50%

Memory breakdown

Weights15.4 GB

KV Cache3.7 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom1.7 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower

See how fast it feelsGemma 4 26B A4B on MacBook Pro M1 Pro 16GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort:

def quicksort(arr):
 if len(arr) <= 1:
 return arr
 pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
 left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
 middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
 right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
 return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

# Example usage
numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1]
print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10]

The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]:
 """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm.

 Args:
 arr: List of integers to sort.

 Returns:
 A new sorted list.
 """
 if len(arr) <= 1:
 return arr
 pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
 left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
 middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
 right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
 return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 9.6 tok/s decode · 20.2s TTFT (warm) · 24 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

Usable shared or unified memory is the main blocker for this model.

Not enough usable memory

The model needs 21.7 GB, but this setup only exposes 11.5 GB of usable shared or unified memory.

Best improvement path

Move to a larger memory pool

A larger unified-memory SKU or a discrete high-bandwidth GPU is the cleanest way to make this model practical.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	F	Too heavy	10.6 tok/s	9979 ms	4K
Coding	F	Too heavy	9.6 tok/s	20153 ms	4K
Agentic Coding	F	Too heavy	9.5 tok/s	29643 ms	4K
Reasoning	F	Too heavy	9.6 tok/s	23817 ms	4K
RAG	F	Too heavy	9.5 tok/s	37054 ms	4K

Quantization options

How Gemma 4 26B A4B (25.200000762939453B params) fits at each quantization level on MacBook Pro M1 Pro 16GB (11.5 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	9.8 GB	Low	F0
Q3_K_S	3	12.3 GB	Low	F0
NVFP4	4

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs Gemma 4 26B A4B well

MacBook Pro M4 32GBBudget pick

32 GB Unified (+16)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.13.5 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$799 MSRP

Mac mini M4 64GBBest value

64 GB Unified (+48)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.14 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$1,099 MSRP

Mac mini M4 32GBApple upgrade

32 GB Unified (+16)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.13.5 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$1,099 MSRP

👁 NVIDIA
RTX 5090 32GBBiggest leap

32 GB VRAM (+16)1792 GB/s (+1592)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.175.5 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$1,999 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

See all results for MacBook Pro M1 Pro 16GB See all hardware for Gemma 4 26B A4B

URL: https://willitrunai.com/can-run/gemma-4-26b-a4b-on-m1-pro-16gb

⇱

Can Gemma 4 26B A4B run on MacBook Pro M1 Pro 16GB?

NO — Won't Fit

Choose the run profile you care about

Memory breakdown

See how fast it feels

What limits this setup

Best improvement path

Performance by workload

Quantization options

Hardware that runs Gemma 4 26B A4B well

Frequently asked questions