Raises estimated decode speed by about 149%.
~$899 MSRP
![]() |
VOOZH | about |
exaone 3.0 7.8b it needs ~9.2 GB VRAM. MacBook Pro M4 Pro 24GB has 17.3 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~41 tok/s.
Operating mode
Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.
Current mode
Balanced
Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.
Select quantization to explore
Fit status
Runs well
Decode
40.6 tok/s
TTFT
4763 ms
Safe context
158K
Memory
9.2 GB / 17.3 GB
This setup is broadly balanced for this model.
Shared-memory contention still exists
The OS, browser, and inference runtime all compete for the same physical memory pool, so real-world headroom is less forgiving than raw capacity suggests.
| Workload | Grade | Fit | Decode | TTFT | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chat | C | Runs well | 40.6 tok/s | 2598 ms | 158K |
| Coding | C | Runs well | 40.6 tok/s | 4763 ms | 158K |
| Agentic Coding | C | Runs well | 40.6 tok/s | 6928 ms | 158K |
| Reasoning | C | Runs well | 40.6 tok/s | 5629 ms | 158K |
| RAG | C | Runs well | 40.6 tok/s | 8660 ms | 158K |
How exaone 3.0 7.8b it (7.800000190734863B params) fits at each quantization level on MacBook Pro M4 Pro 24GB (17.3 GB usable).
| Quant | Bits | VRAM | Quality | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 2 | 3.0 GB | Low | C46 |
Q3_K_S | 3 | 3.8 GB | Low | C47 |
NVFP4 | 4 |
Copy-paste commands to run exaone 3.0 7.8b it on your machine.
Run
lms load hf-bingsu--exaone-3-0-7-8b-it && lms server startUpgrade options
4.4 GB |
| Medium |
| C47 |
Q4_K_M | 4 | 4.8 GB | Medium | C48 |
Q5_K_M | 5 | 5.6 GB | High | C48 |
Q6_K | 6 | 6.4 GB | High | C49 |
Q8_0Best for your GPU | 8 | 8.3 GB | Very High | C51 |
F16 | 16 | 16.0 GB | Maximum | F0 |
Not always. MacBook Pro M4 Pro 24GB can often fit larger models thanks to unified memory, but a discrete GPU with dedicated high-bandwidth VRAM may still decode faster once the model fits. For this combination, the important distinction is capacity versus sustained throughput.