VOOZH about

URL: https://willitrunai.com/can-run/hf-mradermacher--starcoder2-15b-i1-gguf-on-m4-16gb


Can starcoder2 15b i1 run on MacBook Pro M4 16GB?

BARELY — Tight on Memory

D35Poor
Estimated — low-sample bucket· few comparable runs

starcoder2 15b i1 needs ~13.5 GB VRAM. MacBook Pro M4 16GB has 11.5 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~7 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: Very lowStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 13.5 GB, 6.8 tok/s, Very compromised (needs ~1.4 GB host RAM)
13.5 GB required11.5 GB available
117% VRAM needed

2.0 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Very compromised (needs ~1.4 GB host RAM)

Decode

6.8 tok/s

TTFT

28373 ms

Safe context

4K

Memory

13.5 GB / 11.5 GB

Offload

10%

Memory breakdown

Weights9.2 GB
KV Cache1.8 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom1.7 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsstarcoder2 15b i1 on MacBook Pro M4 16GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 6.8 tok/s decode · 28.4s TTFT (warm) · 17 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Shared-memory contention still exists

The OS, browser, and inference runtime all compete for the same physical memory pool, so real-world headroom is less forgiving than raw capacity suggests.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Increase host RAM if you keep offloading

This setup may need roughly 1.4 GB of extra host RAM just for the offloaded portion, before OS and other tools.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatDVery compromised (needs ~0.8 GB host RAM)7.5 tok/s14163 ms4K
CodingDVery compromised (needs ~1.4 GB host RAM)6.8 tok/s28373 ms4K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy6.4 tok/s44275 ms4K
ReasoningDVery compromised (needs ~1.4 GB host RAM)6.8 tok/s33532 ms4K
RAGFToo heavy5.9 tok/s59896 ms

Quantization options

How starcoder2 15b i1 (15B params) fits at each quantization level on MacBook Pro M4 16GB (11.5 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
5.9 GB
LowC52
Q3_K_S
3
7.4 GB
LowC51
NVFP4Best for your GPU

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run starcoder2 15b i1 on your machine.

Run

lms load hf-mradermacher--starcoder2-15b-i1-gguf && lms server start

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs starcoder2 15b i1 well

MacBook Pro M4 32GBBudget pick
32 GB Unified (+16)
C
Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.8.7 tok/s decode

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

Raises estimated decode speed by about 28%.

~$799 MSRP

Mac mini M4 32GBBest value
32 GB Unified (+16)
C
Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.8.7 tok/s decode

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

Raises estimated decode speed by about 28%.

~$1,099 MSRP

MacBook Air M4 24GBApple upgrade
24 GB Unified (+8)
C
Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.8.7 tok/s decode

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

Raises estimated decode speed by about 28%.

~$1,099 MSRP

👁 NVIDIA
RTX A4500 20GBBiggest leap
20 GB VRAM (+4)640 GB/s (+520)
C
Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.54.6 tok/s decode

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

Raises estimated decode speed by about 703%.

~$2,000 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

See all results for MacBook Pro M4 16GBSee all hardware for starcoder2 15b i1
4K
4
8.4 GB
Medium
C51
Q4_K_M
4
9.2 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
10.8 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
12.3 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
16.1 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
30.7 GB
MaximumF0

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.