Raises estimated decode speed by about 224%.
~$9,999 MSRP
![]() |
VOOZH | about |
StarCoder2 15B needs ~25.6 GB VRAM. Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB has 92.2 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~51 tok/s.
Operating mode
Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.
Current mode
Balanced
Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.
Select quantization to explore
Fit status
Runs well
Decode
50.7 tok/s
TTFT
3818 ms
Safe context
622K
Memory
25.6 GB / 92.2 GB
This setup is broadly balanced for this model.
Shared-memory contention still exists
The OS, browser, and inference runtime all compete for the same physical memory pool, so real-world headroom is less forgiving than raw capacity suggests.
| Workload | Grade | Fit | Decode | TTFT | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chat | C | Runs well | 50.7 tok/s | 2082 ms | 622K |
| Coding | C | Runs well | 50.7 tok/s | 3818 ms | 622K |
| Agentic Coding | C | Runs well | 50.7 tok/s | 5553 ms | 622K |
| Reasoning | C | Runs well | 50.7 tok/s | 4512 ms | 622K |
| RAG | C | Runs well | 50.7 tok/s | 6941 ms | 622K |
How StarCoder2 15B (15B params) fits at each quantization level on Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB (92.2 GB usable).
| Quant | Bits | VRAM | Quality | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 2 | 5.9 GB | Low | D39 |
Q3_K_S | 3 | 7.4 GB | Low | D39 |
NVFP4 | 4 |
Copy-paste commands to run StarCoder2 15B on your machine.
Run
lms load hf-second-state--starcoder2-15b-gguf && lms server startUpgrade options
8.4 GB |
| Medium |
| D39 |
Q4_K_M | 4 | 9.2 GB | Medium | D39 |
Q5_K_M | 5 | 10.8 GB | High | D40 |
Q6_K | 6 | 12.3 GB | High | D40 |
Q8_0 | 8 | 16.1 GB | Very High | C40 |
F16Best for your GPU | 16 | 30.7 GB | Maximum | C42 |
Not always. Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB can often fit larger models thanks to unified memory, but a discrete GPU with dedicated high-bandwidth VRAM may still decode faster once the model fits. For this combination, the important distinction is capacity versus sustained throughput.