VOOZH about

URL: https://willitrunai.com/can-run/mistral-small-24b-on-gaudi-3-128gb


Can Mistral Small 24B run on Gaudi 3 128GB?

YES — Runs Great

A79Great
Estimated from fit model

Mistral Small 24B needs ~30.8 GB VRAM. Gaudi 3 128GB has 128.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~190 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: RoomyBandwidth: HighStack: StandardBottleneck: Balanced
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 30.8 GB, 190.2 tok/s, Runs well
30.8 GB required128.0 GB available
24% VRAM used

Fit status

Runs well

Decode

190.2 tok/s

TTFT

1018 ms

Safe context

33K

Memory

30.8 GB / 128.0 GB

Memory breakdown

Weights14.6 GB
KV Cache2.4 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom12.8 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsMistral Small 24B on Gaudi 3 128GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 190.2 tok/s decode · 1.0s TTFT (warm) · 476 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatARuns well190.2 tok/s555 ms33K
CodingARuns well190.2 tok/s1018 ms33K
Agentic CodingARuns well190.2 tok/s1481 ms33K
ReasoningARuns well190.2 tok/s1203 ms33K
RAGARuns well190.2 tok/s1851 ms33K

Quantization options

How Mistral Small 24B (24B params) fits at each quantization level on Gaudi 3 128GB (128.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
9.4 GB
LowA70
Q3_K_S
3
11.8 GB
LowA70
NVFP4
4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Mistral Small 24B on your machine.

Run

ollama run mistral-small

Your hardware

More models your Gaudi 3 128GB can run

ModelParamsGradeDecodeCapabilities
👁 Mistral
Devstral 2 123B Instruct
123BS37.5 tok/s
👁 Alibaba
Qwen3-Coder 30B A3B Instruct
30.5BS

Frequently asked questions

See all results for Gaudi 3 128GBSee all hardware for Mistral Small 24B
13.4 GB
Medium
A71
Q4_K_M
4
14.6 GB
MediumA71
Q5_K_M
5
17.3 GB
HighA71
Q6_K
6
19.7 GB
HighA71
Q8_0
8
25.7 GB
Very HighA72
F16Best for your GPU
16
49.2 GB
MaximumA76
391.6 tok/s
👁 Alibaba
Qwen 3.5 27B
27BS169.8 tok/s
👁 Alibaba
Qwen 3.6 27B
27BS105.9 tok/s
👁 Alibaba
Qwen 3.5 122B A10B
122BS104.1 tok/s

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.