VOOZH about

URL: https://willitrunai.com/can-run/phi-3-medium-14b-on-m3-pro-36gb


Can Phi 3 Medium 14B run on MacBook Pro M3 Pro 36GB?

YES — Runs Great

B60Good
Estimated from fit model

Phi 3 Medium 14B needs ~16.4 GB VRAM. MacBook Pro M3 Pro 36GB has 25.9 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~13 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: RoomyBandwidth: Very lowStack: StandardBottleneck: Memory bandwidth
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 16.4 GB, 13.8 tok/s, Runs well
16.4 GB required25.9 GB available
63% VRAM used

Fit status

Runs well

Decode

13.8 tok/s

TTFT

14046 ms

Safe context

66K

Memory

16.4 GB / 25.9 GB

Memory breakdown

Weights8.5 GB
KV Cache3.1 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom3.9 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsPhi 3 Medium 14B on MacBook Pro M3 Pro 36GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Solve: If a train travels at 60 mph for 2.5 hours, how far does it go?
Let me work through this step by step. Given information: - Speed = 60 mph (miles per hour) - Time = 2.5 hours Formula: Distance = Speed x Time Calculation: Distance = 60 mph x 2.5 h = 150 miles The train travels 150 miles. Double-check: at 60 mph the train covers 60 miles each hour. In half an hour it covers 30 miles. So in 2.5 hours: 60 + 60 + 30 = 150 miles. Confirmed.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>What if the train stops for 20 minutes halfway?
The stop doesn't change the total distance covered while moving, but it affects total trip time. Breakdown: - First half: 1.25 hours at 60 mph = 75 miles - Stop: 20 minutes (no distance) - Second half: 1.25 hours at 60 mph = 75 miles Total distance: 150 miles (same) Total time: 2.5 h + 0.33 h = 2.83 hours Average speed: 150 / 2.83 = 53 mph The distance stays the same but average speed drops to 53 mph because of the stop.
Estimated: 13.8 tok/s decode · 14.0s TTFT (warm) · 35 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

This setup is broadly balanced for this model.

Shared-memory contention still exists

The OS, browser, and inference runtime all compete for the same physical memory pool, so real-world headroom is less forgiving than raw capacity suggests.

Best improvement path

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatBRuns well12.8 tok/s8236 ms66K
CodingBRuns well12.8 tok/s15099 ms66K
Agentic CodingBRuns well12.8 tok/s21962 ms66K
ReasoningBRuns well12.8 tok/s17844 ms66K
RAGBRuns well12.8 tok/s27453 ms66K

Quantization options

How Phi 3 Medium 14B (14B params) fits at each quantization level on MacBook Pro M3 Pro 36GB (25.9 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
5.5 GB
LowB56
Q3_K_S
3
6.9 GB
LowB57
NVFP4
4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Phi 3 Medium 14B on your machine.

Run

ollama run phi3:medium

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs Phi 3 Medium 14B well

MacBook Pro M4 Max 48GBBudget pick
48 GB Unified (+12)546 GB/s (+396)
B
Raises estimated decode speed by about 176%.38.1 tok/s decode

Raises estimated decode speed by about 176%.

Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.

~$2,499 MSRP

Mac Studio M2 Ultra 64GBBest value
64 GB Unified (+28)800 GB/s (+650)
B
Raises estimated decode speed by about 323%.58.4 tok/s decode

Raises estimated decode speed by about 323%.

Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.

~$3,999 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

See all results for MacBook Pro M3 Pro 36GBSee all hardware for Phi 3 Medium 14B
7.8 GB
Medium
B57
Q4_K_M
4
8.5 GB
MediumB58
Q5_K_M
5
10.1 GB
HighB59
Q6_K
6
11.5 GB
HighB60
Q8_0Best for your GPU
8
15.0 GB
Very HighB61
F16
16
28.7 GB
MaximumF0

Not always. MacBook Pro M3 Pro 36GB can often fit larger models thanks to unified memory, but a discrete GPU with dedicated high-bandwidth VRAM may still decode faster once the model fits. For this combination, the important distinction is capacity versus sustained throughput.