VOOZH about

URL: https://willitrunai.com/can-run/qwen-3.5-4b-on-arc-a380-6gb


Can Qwen 3.5 4B run on Intel Arc A380 6GB?

YES — With Offload

S90Excellent
Estimated from fit model

Qwen 3.5 4B needs ~6.1 GB VRAM. Intel Arc A380 6GB has 6.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~27 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: Very lowStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 6.1 GB, 28.7 tok/s, Runs with offload (needs ~0.1 GB host RAM)
6.1 GB required6.0 GB available
102% VRAM needed

100 MB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Runs with offload (needs ~0.1 GB host RAM)

Decode

28.7 tok/s

TTFT

6742 ms

Safe context

15K

Memory

6.1 GB / 6.0 GB

Memory breakdown

Weights2.4 GB
KV Cache2.2 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom0.6 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsQwen 3.5 4B on Intel Arc A380 6GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 28.7 tok/s decode · 6.7s TTFT (warm) · 72 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatSTight fit40.2 tok/s2630 ms15K
CodingSRuns with offload26.7 tok/s7248 ms15K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy15.1 tok/s18676 ms15K
ReasoningSRuns with offload (needs ~0.1 GB host RAM)28.7 tok/s7968 ms15K
RAGFToo heavy15.1 tok/s23345 ms15K

Quantization options

How Qwen 3.5 4B (4B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc A380 6GB (6.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
1.6 GB
LowS94
Q3_K_S
3
2.0 GB
LowS95
NVFP4
4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Qwen 3.5 4B on your machine.

Run

ollama run qwen3.5:4b

Frequently asked questions

See all results for Intel Arc A380 6GBSee all hardware for Qwen 3.5 4B
2.2 GB
Medium
S95
Q4_K_M
4
2.4 GB
MediumS94
Q5_K_M
5
2.9 GB
HighS94
Q6_KBest for your GPU
6
3.3 GB
HighS94
Q8_0
8
4.3 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
8.2 GB
MaximumF0

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.