VOOZH about

URL: https://willitrunai.com/can-run/yi-34b-chat-on-m1-max-64gb


Can Yi 34B Chat run on MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB?

YES — Runs Great

C51Usable
Estimated from fit model

Yi 34B Chat needs ~32.2 GB VRAM. MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB has 46.1 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~11 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: RoomyBandwidth: LowStack: StandardBottleneck: Balanced
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 32.2 GB, 11.5 tok/s, Runs well
32.2 GB required46.1 GB available
70% VRAM used

Fit status

Runs well

Decode

11.5 tok/s

TTFT

16810 ms

Safe context

77K

Memory

32.2 GB / 46.1 GB

Memory breakdown

Weights20.7 GB
KV Cache3.7 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom6.9 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsYi 34B Chat on MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>What is local AI inference?
Local AI inference means running an AI language model directly on your own hardware — your laptop, desktop, or server — instead of sending requests to a remote cloud API. When you run inference locally the model weights are loaded into your GPU or unified memory. Each token you generate requires reading those weights from memory, so memory bandwidth is the main bottleneck for decode speed. Key benefits of running locally: - Full privacy: your prompts never leave your machine - No per-token cost or rate limits - Works offline once the model is downloaded - Latency depends only on your hardware
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>How much VRAM do I need?
It depends on the model size and quantization level. A rough rule of thumb: Model size Q4 (4-bit) Q8 (8-bit) FP16 7B params ~4.3 GB ~7.5 GB ~14 GB 13B params ~7.9 GB ~13.9 GB ~26 GB 70B params ~42.7 GB ~74.9 GB ~140 GB Most people use 4-bit quantization (Q4_K_M) which gives 90-95% of full quality at a fraction of the memory. A 24 GB GPU can comfortably run most 7B-13B models.
Estimated: 11.5 tok/s decode · 16.8s TTFT (warm) · 29 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

This setup is broadly balanced for this model.

Shared-memory contention still exists

The OS, browser, and inference runtime all compete for the same physical memory pool, so real-world headroom is less forgiving than raw capacity suggests.

Best improvement path

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatCRuns well11.5 tok/s9169 ms77K
CodingCRuns well10.6 tok/s18251 ms77K
Agentic CodingCRuns well11.5 tok/s24451 ms77K
ReasoningCRuns well11.5 tok/s19867 ms77K
RAGCRuns well11.5 tok/s30564 ms77K

Quantization options

How Yi 34B Chat (34B params) fits at each quantization level on MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB (46.1 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
13.3 GB
LowC46
Q3_K_S
3
16.7 GB
LowC47
NVFP4
4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Yi 34B Chat on your machine.

Run

lms load Yi-34B-Chat && lms server start

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs Yi 34B Chat well

Radeon Pro W7900 48GBBudget pick
864 GB/s (+464)
C
Raises estimated decode speed by about 132%.26.7 tok/s decode

Raises estimated decode speed by about 132%.

~$3,999 MSRP

Radeon PRO W7900 DS 48GBBest value
864 GB/s (+464)
C
Raises estimated decode speed by about 132%.26.7 tok/s decode

Raises estimated decode speed by about 132%.

~$3,999 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

See all results for MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GBSee all hardware for Yi 34B Chat
19.0 GB
Medium
C48
Q4_K_M
4
20.7 GB
MediumC48
Q5_K_M
5
24.5 GB
HighC50
Q6_K
6
27.9 GB
HighC50
Q8_0Best for your GPU
8
36.4 GB
Very HighC49
F16
16
69.7 GB
MaximumF0

Not always. MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB can often fit larger models thanks to unified memory, but a discrete GPU with dedicated high-bandwidth VRAM may still decode faster once the model fits. For this combination, the important distinction is capacity versus sustained throughput.