References (82)
Amm. Marc. XXIII, 4.Apparently, it was a one-armed machine that Tertullian mentioned under this name in AD 209 (Tert. scorp. 1-2).Veg. mil. II, 25; III, 3; IV, 8, 22, 44.Theophanes Conf., Chronographia a. m. 5841; Chron. Pasch. (Dindorf) p. 537, 17. Defenders of Nisibis used onagri to destroy the elephants attacking a breach in the wall. Cf. Veg. mil., III, 24; Julian, Or., II, 65d-66a.Procop. Goth. I, 21, 19.Philon Pol. 91, 36.9 Amm. Marc. XIX, 2, 7; 7, 6-7; XX, 7, 10; XXXI, 15, 12.Veg. mil. II, 25; III, 3; IV, 8-9, 22.See the discussion in Brennan 1980, 555.Apoll. Pol. W188, 2-9; Anon. Byz. Pol. W252, 17-254, 6.De Folard 1727, 324-336.Grose 1788, 302.Dufour 1840, 43-48, 75-79, 120, pl. 5, fig. 10. 16 Chew 2001, 230.Campbell 2003, 46; Chew 2001, 229, fig. 5; Hennebert 1887, 3, fig. 1.Payne-Gallwey 1903, 279-299, fig. 202; Payne-Gallwey 1907, 10-18, fig. 1; Credland 2011, 62-63, 65-66, figs. 12, 13a-b, 16a-b.Payne-Gallwey 1903, 267, 277, figs. 187, 192.De machinis (Ms. Lat. 7239, BnF, Paris). The Bavarian manuscript does not in- clude it, either (CLM 28800, BSB, Munich).Mérimée 1851, fol. 22r-22v, pl. 11.Schramm 1910, 34-37; Schramm 1916, 231-233; Schramm 1918a, 70-74; Schramm 1918b, 259-272; Marsden 1971, 249-265.23 The tension force of the torsion bundle of Schramm's onager reached 60 tons (Schramm 1910, 35).Schramm 1918a, 70-71, Abb. 33-34, Taf. 10; Schramm 1918b, Abb. 14; Marsden 1971, pl. 14.Here we should mention the work of Marc Cherretté. Unfortunately, his strange "reconstruction" is completely divorced from the historical context and is almost impossible to comment (Cherretté 2002, 117-133).Schramm 1918b, 268; Marsden 1971, 251; Boeft et al. 1998, 64; Den Hengst 1999, 32; Rihll 2007, 245.For Late Antique concepts of the heavenly firmament and its axis see e. g. Isi- dore of Seville (Etym. III, 33, 36-38).Schramm 1918a, 73; Schramm 1918b, 268, 270; Marsden 1971, 252.Marsden 1971, 252, figs. 2-3.32 Schramm 1918b, 263; Lendle 1975, 94-95; Lendle 1983, 27.Ms. 92, Christ Church, Oxford.Pal. Lat. 1888, BAV, Vatican. 35 CPV 3069, ÖNB, Vienna.Schmidtchen 1987, 27-30; Baatz 2001, 11. Schmidtchen provides two original Late Medieval illustrations, but claims that they expose the lack of technical knowledge of their authors. Following Payne-Gallwey, Schmidtchen then refers to a non-existent drawing from the Mariano Taccola's Paris manuscript. 39 Purton 2006, 89.For a similar opinion, see Purton 2010, 273-274.Hs. 25801, GNM, Nürnberg, fol. 19v. Unfortunately, the Alemannic rhymed text of the treatise does not provide a detailed description of the machine, not to mention this particular part.Marsden 1971, 255-256.43 On the action of this machine, see the description of the storming of Vetera by the Batavians (Tac. hist. IV, 30) and also Aeneas Tacticus (De obs. tol. XXX- IX, 6).Marsden 1971, 252; Schramm 1918b, 270.Fontaine 1977, 87, fig. 2; Drachmann 1972, 494.Schramm 1910, 34; Schramm 1918a, 73; Schramm 1918b, 270; Marsden 1971, 252.Drachmann 1972, 494.Amm. Marc. XX, 3, 11.Den Hengst 1999, 32; Boeft et al. 1998, 67.Campbell 2003, 43, pl. G.Hart/Lewis 1986, 356-357, 359.Schramm 1910, 34, n. 1; Schramm 1918a, 73, n. 1.Amm. Marc. XIX, 2, 7; 7, 6-7; XXIV, 4, 28; XIX, 15, 12.Heron Bel. W93, 7.Cilicium, a rough cloth made of goat's wool used for making the buffer, was often stretched on ropes on battlements for protection against projec- tiles (cilicia -Veg. mil. IV, 6, κιλίκια -Mauric. strat. X, 3). Maurice also re- peatedly mentions it when he talks about protecting carriages of a wagon train (strat. XII, B, 6; 18), as well as the ballistae on the dromons (strat. XII, B, 21)."In 2007, we worked […] to make a revolutionary torsion design. In short, we decided to raise our rope bundle, and allow ourselves to have a nearly 180 degree pull down. This allowed us to generate tremendous power and gave us flexibility to tuck our sling underneath the machine, like a tradition- al catapult or trebuchet. This slowed down the acceleration on the pump- kin, and allowed us to launch plain watermelons over 1,800 ft -something that would be entirely impossible in a traditional mangonel style catapult." <http://romanreveng3.tumblr.com/07> (accessed 30.04.2016).Apparently, the rhymed text of the Nuremberg manuscript specifies the length of the sling: it should come all the way up to the torsion bundle, i. e. to equal the length of the sling end of the arm (Hs. 25801, GNM, Nürnberg, fol. 20r).Marsden 1971, 260.Hs. 25801, GNM, Nürnberg, fol. 19v.Nevertheless, the 3D-model of the onager shown in Fig. 8 cannot be viewed as a fully fledged reconstruction due to the scarcity of our sources and the considerations of indirect evidence only. BIBLIOGRAPHY Baatz 2001 • D. Baatz, Katapulte und mechanische Handwaffen des spätrömi- schen Heeres. Journal of Roman Military Equipment Studies 10, 2001, 5-19.Boeft et al. 1998 • J. den Boeft/J. W. Drijvers/D. den Hengst/H. C. Teitler, Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus XXII (Gro- ningen 1998).Brennan 1980 • P. Brennan, Combined Legionary Detachment as Artillery Units in Late-Roman Danubian Bridgehead Dispositions. Chiron 10, 1980, 553 -567.Campbell 2003 • D. B. Campbell, Greek and Roman Artillery 399 BC -AD 363 (Oxford 2003).Cherretté 2002 • M. Cherretté, The onager according to Ammianus Marcelli- nus. Journal of Roman Military Equipment Studies 12/13, 2002, 117-133. Chew 2001 • H. Chew, Napoléon III et l'archéologie expérimentale. Bulletin de la Société Historique de Compiègne 37, 2001, 211-238.Credland 2011 • A. G. Credland, Sir Ralph Payne-Gallwey Bt. and the Study of Medieval and Ancient Projectile Weapons. Arms and Armour 8, 1, 2011, 46-88. Drachmann 1972 • A. Drachmann, Greek and Roman Artillery. Technical Trea- tises by E. W. Marsden. Technology and Culture 13,3, 1972, 487-494.Dufour 1840 • G. H. Dufour, Mémoire sur l'artillerie des anciens et sur celle du Moyen Âge (Paris/Genève 1840).De Folard 1727 • J.-C. de Folard, Histoire de Polybe, nouvellement traduite du grec par Dom Vincent Thuillier. Avec un commentaire ou un corps de science militaire par M. de Folard 2 (Paris 1727).Fontaine 1977 • J. Fontaine, Ammien Marcellin. Histoire. Tome IV (Livres XXIII-XXV) (Paris 1977).Grose 1788 • F. Grose, Military Antiquities Respecting a History of the English Army, from the Conquest to the Present Time 2 (London 1788).Hart/Lewis 1986 • V. G. Hart/M. J. T. Lewis, Mechanics of the onager. Journal of Engineering Mathematics 20, 1986, 345-365.Den Hengst 1999 • D. den Hengst, Preparing the Reader for War. Ammianus' digression on siege engines. In: J. W. Drijvers/D. Hunt (eds.), The Late Roman World and its Historian (London 1999) 29-39.Hennebert 1887 • E. Hennebert, L'Artillerie (Paris 1887).Kelso 2003 • I. Kelso, Artillery as a Classicizing Digression. Historia 52, 1, 2003, 122-125.Kessener 2012 • P. Kessener, The Mechanization of Marble Slab Production. In: R. Kreiner/W. Letzner (eds.), SPA. Sanitas Per Aquam. Tagungsband des In- ternationalen Frontinus-Symposiums zur Technik und Kulturgeschichte der an- tiken Thermen. Aachen, 18.-22. März 2009. Bulletin Antieke Beschaving Sup- plement 21 (Leuven 2012) 197-206.Kocsis 2008 • L. Kocsis, Editorial. ROMEC XV Conference in the Hungarian National Museum, Budapest. Journal of Roman Military Equipment Studies 16, 2008, 9-13.Landels 2000 • J. G. Landels, Engineering in the Ancient World (London 2000). Lendle 1975 • O. Lendle, Schildkröten. Antike Kriegsmaschinen in poliorketi- schen Texten. Palingenesia 10 (Wiesbaden 1975).Lendle 1983 • O. Lendle, Texte und Untersuchungen zum technischen Bereich der antiken Poliorketik. Palingenesia 19 (Wiesbaden 1983).Marsden 1971 • E. W. Marsden, Greek and Roman Artillery. Technical Treatis- es (Oxford 1971).Mérimée 1851 • P. Mérimée, Architecture militaire. In: P. Lacroix/F. Séré (eds.), Le Moyen Âge et la Renaissance 5 (Paris 1851).Payne-Gallwey 1903 • R. Payne-Gallwey. The Crossbow, Mediaeval and Mod- ern, Military and Sporting, its Construction, History, and Management. With a Treatise on the Balista and Catapult of the Ancients (London 1903). Payne-Gallwey 1907 • R. Payne-Gallwey, Appendix to the Book of the Cross- bow and Ancient Projectile Engines (London 1907). Purton 2006 • P. Purton, The Myth of the Mangonel. Torsion Artillery in the Middle Ages. Arms and Armour 3, 1, 2006, 79-90.Purton 2010 • P. Purton, A History of the Late Medieval Siege 1200-1500 (Woodbridge 2010).La Regina 1999 • A. La Regina (ed.), L'Arte dell'Assedio di Apollodoro di Da- masco (Roma 1999).Rihll 2007 • T. Rihll, The Catapult. A History (Yardley 2007). Schalles 2010 • H.-J. Schalles. Die frühkaiserzeitliche Manuballista aus Xan- ten-Wardt. Xantener Berichte 18 (Mainz 2010).Schmidtchen 1987 • V. Schmidtchen, Büchsen, Bliden und Ballisten. Bernhard Rathgen und das mittelalterliche Geschützwesen. In: B. Rathgen, Das Geschütz Mittelalter ²(Düsseldorf 1987) 5-48.Schramm 1910 • E. Schramm, Griechisch-römische Geschütze. Bemerkungen zu der Rekonstruktion (Metz 1910).Schramm 1916 • E. Schramm. Vom onager. Zeitschrift für historische Waffen- kunde 7/8, 1916, 231-233.Schramm 1918a • E. Schramm, Die antiken Geschütze der Saalburg. Bemer- kungen zu ihrer Rekonstruktion (Berlin 1918).Schramm 1918b • E. Schramm, Μονάγκων und Onager. Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Philologisch-his- torische Klasse (Göttingen 1918) 259-272.Sullivan 2000 • D. F. Sullivan, Siegecraft. Two Tenth-Century Instructional Manuals by "Heron of Byzantium" (Washington 2000).Ulrich 2007 • R. B. Ulrich, Roman Woodworking (New Haven 2007).Vicente et al. 1999 • J. D. Vicente/M. Pilar Punter/B. Ezquerra, La catapulta tardo-republicana y otro equipamiento militar de "La Caridad" (Camineal, Te- ruel). Journal of Roman Military Equipment Studies 8, 1999, 167-199. ILDAR KAYUMOV