VOOZH about

URL: https://www.academia.edu/7488679/The_earliest_known_member_of_the_rorqual_gray_whale_clade_Mammalia_Cetacea

⇱ (PDF) The earliest known member of the rorqual—gray whale clade (Mammalia, Cetacea


👁 Academia.edu
👁 Academia.edu

Outline

The earliest known member of the rorqual—gray whale clade (Mammalia, Cetacea

2004, Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology

https://doi.org/10.1671/2401Last updated
visibility

description

11 pages

👁 Image

Sign up for access to the world's latest research

checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact

Abstract

Eobalaenoptera harrisoni, gen. et sp. nov., is described from a partial skeleton collected from the middle Miocene Calvert Formation of Virginia. Characteristics of this taxon, particularly of the petrosal, indicate that the new whale is a member of the clade that includes the Balaenopteridae (rorquals) and Eschrichtidae (gray whales) to the exclusion of “cetotheres” and the Balaenidae (right whales). Some of the probable synapomorphies of this clade include an elongate pars cochlearis, a tubular internal auditory meatus, the greater petrosal nerve foramen on the tympanic side of the petrosal, the stylomastoid fossa extending onto the posterior process of the petrosal, no medial groove on the pars cochlearis, four digits on each forelimb, depressed supraorbital processes, and ascending processes of maxillae extending onto the vertex. The approximate 14-million-year age of the specimen makes it the oldest known member of the clade by some 3 to 5 million years, and extends the fossil record of this clade closer to the divergence time estimated by some recent molecular studies.

Key takeaways

  1. Eobalaenoptera harrisoni, dated at approximately 14 million years, is the oldest known member of rorqual-gray whale clade.
  2. This new taxon exhibits synapomorphies aligning it with Balaenopteridae and Eschrichtiidae, excluding Balaenidae.
  3. The fossil extends the timeline of Balaenopteridae-Eschrichtiidae divergence to at least 14 million years ago.
  4. Eobalaenoptera demonstrates significant features like elongated pars cochlearis and unique petrosal characteristics.
  5. Understanding Eobalaenoptera's phylogenetic placement aids in clarifying mysticete evolutionary history during the Miocene.

Related papers

Cenozoic Mammals of Land and Sea: Tributes to the Career of Clayton E. Ray

Smithsonian contributions to paleobiology, 2002

Emry, Robert J., editor. Cenozoic Mammals of Land and Sea: Tributes to the Career of Clay¬ ton E. Ray. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 93, 372 pages, 197 figures, 11 plates, 46 tables, 2002.-This is a volume of collected papers published to honor the career of Clayton E. Ray, now Curator Emeritus in the Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, and Curator of Late Cenozoic Mammals and of Fossil Marine Mammals in the same department for more than 30 years before his retirement in 1994. The volume includes a preface, a biography and bibliography of Clayton E. Ray, and 19 papers devoted principally to Pleistocene mammals and to fossil marine mammals. Gary Morgan describes late Pleistocene mammalian faunas from several sites in southernmost Florida and discusses the Neotropical influence in Florida's Pleistocene faunas. Richard H. Tedford describes the basicranium of the Pleistocene giant wombat Phascolonus gigas Owen and dis¬ cusses its significance in marsupial phylogenetic reconstruction. Gerardo De luliis and A. Gor¬ don Edmund describe Vassallia maxima Castellanos, the only pre-Pleistocene pampathere known in which a skull and mandible are associated with osteoderms; the range of osteoderm variation in one associated individual allows them to synonymize other taxa that had been based on osteoderm differences. Paul W. Parmalee and Russell Wm. Graham report additional records of the giant beaver, Castoroides, from the mid-South. Frederick Grady, Joaquin Arroyo-Cabrales, and E. Ray Garton report the northernmost known occurrence of vampire bats in the Pleistocene of eastern North America. H. Gregory McDonald reports the second known occurrence of the badger Taxidea taxus in the Pleistocene of Kentucky and discusses the paleoecological implications of the occurrence. Jerry N. McDonald and George E. Lammers describe Bison antiquus from Ontario and discuss the evolution of bison in the Holocene of North America. Daryl P. Domning presents a new analysis and interpretation of the terres¬ trial posture in desmostylians. Thomas A. Demere and Annalisa Berta describe new material and present a phylogenetic analysis of the Miocene pinniped Desmatophoca oregonensis from Oregon. Irina A. Koretsky and Dan Grigorescu describe and evaluate the systematic position of the fossil monk seal Pontophoca sarmatica from the Miocene of eastern Europe. Irina A. Koretsky and Peter Holec describe a new, primitive, phocid pinniped from the early middle Miocene of Slovakia and discuss its bearing on the phylogeny and classification of pinnipeds. Irina A. Koretsky and Albert E. Sanders report remains of the oldest known phocid pinniped from the late Oligocene of South Carolina. R. Ewan Fordyce describes and discusses a bizarre archaic Oligocene dolphin from the eastern North Pacific, on which he bases a new species, genus, and subfamily. Christian de Muizon, Daryl P. Domning, and Darlene R. Ketten describe and discuss the paleobiology and behavior of an unusual walrus-convergent delphinoid ceta¬ cean from the early Pliocene of Peru. Susan D. Dawson and Michael D. Gottfried report paleopathologic conditions in a Miocene odontocete cetacean. Albert E. Sanders and Lawrence G. Barnes contribute two papers, both describing and analyzing new, primitive, cetotheriid mysticete cetaceans from the late Oligocene of South Carolina. James W. Westgate and Frank C. Whitmore, Jr., describe a new species of bowhead whale from the Pliocene Yorktown Forma¬ tion in Virginia. James G. Mead and Rosemary G. Dagit present an account of the search for the 1880s manuscript of J.A. Allen's unpublished monograph on the mammalian orders Cete and Sirenia; the manuscript was not found but the 12 plates that were prepared for it are pub¬ lished herein. Official publication date is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution's annual report. Annals of the Smithsonian Institution. SERIES COVER DESIGN: The trilobite Phacops rana Green.

Comparative osteology and phylogenetic relationships of<i>Miocaperea pulchra</i>, the first fossil pygmy right whale genus and species (Cetacea, Mysticeti, Neobalaenidae)

Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012

A fossil pygmy right whale (Cetacea, Mysticeti, Neobalaenidae) with exquisitely preserved baleen is described for the first time in the history of cetacean palaeontology, providing a wealth of information about the evolutionary history and palaeobiogeography of Neobalaenidae. This exquisitely preserved specimen is assigned to a new genus and species, Miocaperea pulchra gen. et sp. nov., and differs from Caperea marginata Gray, 1846, the only living taxon currently assigned to Neobalaenidae, in details of the temporal fossa and basicranium. A thorough comparative analysis of the skeleton of M. pulchra gen. et sp. nov. and C. marginata is also provided, and forms the basis of an extensive osteology-based phylogenetic analysis, confirming the placement of M. pulchra gen. et sp. nov. within Neobalaenidae as well as the monophyly of Neobalaenidae and Balaenidae; the phylogenetic results support the validity of the superfamily Balaenoidea. No relationship with Balaenopteroidea was found by the present study, and thus the balaenopterid-like morphological features observed in C. marginata must have resulted from parallel evolution. The presence of M. pulchra gen. et sp. nov. around 2000 km north from the northernmost sightings of C. marginata suggests that different ecological conditions were able to support pygmy right whale populations in what is now Peru, and that subsequent environmental change caused a southern shift in the distribution of the living neobalaenid whales.

Bianucci G. & Post K. — Caviziphius altirostris, a new beaked whale from the Miocene southern North Sea basin. Deinsea

An odontocete cranium from Miocene deposits in northern Belgium is examined and referred to Caviziphius altirostris, a new genus and species of beaked whale. In the general architecture of its vertex and closed mesorostral canal, Caviziphius resembles the fossil genera Ziphirostrum and Choneziphius, but differs from all known ziphiids by a very deep excavated prenarial basin with a semicircular outline in lateral view. This peculiar cranial architecture of Caviziphius might indicate an advanced and efficient mechanism of sound production in this fossil ziphiid.

A new balaenopterid whale from the late Miocene of the Southern North Sea Basin and the evolution of balaenopterid diversity (Cetacea, Mysticeti)

PeerJ

Background Balaenopterid mysticetes represent the most successful family-rank group of this clade. Their evolutionary history is characterized by a rich fossil record but the origin of the living genera is still largely not understood. Recent discoveries in the southern border of the North Sea revealed a number of well preserved fossil balaenopterid whales that may help resolving this problem. In particular, skull NMR 14035 shares morphological characters with the living humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangliae and, for this reason, its characteristics are investigated here. Methods The comparative anatomical analysis of the new specimen formed the basis of a new phylogenetic analysis of the Mysticeti based on a matrix including 350 morphological character states scored for 82 Operational Taxonomic Units. The stratigraphic age of the specimen was determined based on the analysis of the dinocyst assemblage recovered in the associated sediment. We assessed clade diversity in Balaenopter...

On the olfactory anatomy in an archaic whale (Protocetidae, Cetacea) and the minke whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata (Balaenopteridae, Cetacea)

"The structure of the olfactory apparatus is not well known in both archaic and extant whales; the result of poor preservation in most fossils and locational isolation deep within the skulls in both fossil and Recent taxa. Several specimens now shed additional light on the subject. A partial skull of an archaic cetacean is reported from the Pamunkey River, Virginia, USA. The specimen probably derives from the upper middle Eocene (Piney Point Formation) and is tentatively assigned to the Protocetidae. Uncrushed cranial cavities associated with the olfactory apparatus were devoid of sediment. CT scans clearly reveal the dorsal nasal meatus, ethmoturbinates within the olfactory recess, the cribriform plate, the area occupied by the olfactory bulbs, and the olfactory nerve tract. Several sectioned skulls of the minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) were also examined, and olfactory structures are remarkably similar to those observed in the fossil skull from the Pamunkey River. One important difference between the two is that the fossil specimen has an elongate olfactory nerve tract. The more forward position of the external nares in extant balaenopterids when compared with those of extant odontocetes is interpreted to be the result of the need to retain a functional olfactory apparatus and the forward position of the supraoccipital/ cranial vertex. An increase in the distance between the occipital condyles and the vertex in balaenopterids enhances the mechanical advantage of the epaxial musculature that inserts on the occiput, a specialization that likely stabilizes the head of these enormous mammals during lunge feeding."

Balaena ricei, a New Species of Bowhead Whale from the Yorktown Formation (Pliocene) of Hampton, Virginia

Fossil species of Balaena have previously been named on the basis of material from the Western Hemisphere, but all are founded upon undiagnostic material. The holotype of B. ricei new species consists of a partial skull, partial mandible, all major flip-per bones, and representatives of all types of vertebrae, allowing comparison with the two best-known European species. This study, together with the known occurrence of Balaena spe-cies in the Pliocene of Europe, strengthens the conclusion that bowhead whales were present on both sides of the North Atlantic Ocean at that time. By contrast, remains of Balaena have not been reported from Miocene deposits of the Atlantic coast of North America.

Ultrasonic hearing and echolocation in the earliest toothed whales

The evolution of biosonar (production of high-frequency sound and reception of its echo) was a key innovation of toothed whales and dolphins (Odontoceti) that facilitated phylogenetic diversification and rise to ecological predominance. Yet exactly when high-frequency hearing first evolved in odontocete history remains a fundamental question in cetacean biology. Here, we show that archaic odontocetes had a cochlea specialized for sensing high-frequency sound, as exemplified by an Oligocene xenorophid, one of the earliest diverging stem groups. This specialization is not as extreme as that seen in the crown clade. Paired with anatomical correlates for high-frequency signal production in Xenorophidae, this is strong evidence that the most archaic toothed whales possessed a functional biosonar system, and that this signature adaptation of odontocetes was acquired at or soon after their origin.

👁 Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (84)

  1. Andrews, G. W. 1985. Unpublished report on diatoms of the Carmel Church Quarry. United States Geological Survey E&R Report, 1p.
  2. Andrews, G. W. 1988. A revised marine diatom zonation for Miocene strata of the southeastern United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1481:1-29.
  3. A ´rnason, U., and A. Gullberg. 1994. Relationship of baleen whales established by cytochrome b gene sequence comparison. Nature 367:726-728.
  4. Barnes, L. G., and S. A. McLeod. 1984. The fossil record and phyletic relationships of gray whales; pp. 3-32 in M. L. Jones, S. Swartz, and S. Leatherwood (eds.), The Gray Whale. Academic Press, New York.
  5. Brisson, M. J. 1762. Le regnum animale in classes IX distributum, sive synopsis methodica sistens generalem animalium distributionem in classes IX, & duarum primarum classium, quadrupedum scilicet & cetaceorum, particularem dibvisionem in ordines, sectiones, genera & species. T. Haak, Paris, 296 pp.
  6. Cassens, I., S. Vicario, V. G. Waddell, H. Balchowsky, D. Van Belle, W. Ding, C. Fan, R. S. Lal Mohan, P. C. Simo ˜es-Lopes, R. Bastida, A. Meyer, M. J. Stanhope, and M. C. Milinkovitch. 2000. Inde- pendent adaptation to riverine habitats allowed survival of ancient cetacean lineages. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences 97:11343-11347.
  7. Dooley, A. C., Jr. 1993. The vertebrate fauna of the Calvert Formation (middle Miocene) at the Caroline Stone Quarry, Caroline County, Vir- ginia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 13(3, Supplement):33A.
  8. Fordyce, R. E. 1980. Whale evolution and Oligocene southern ocean environments. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 31:319-336.
  9. Fordyce, R. E. 1992. Cetacean evolution and Eocene/Oligocene envi- ronments; pp. 368-381 in D. Prothero and W. Berggren (eds.), Eo- cene-Oligocene Climatic and Biotic Evolution. Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton.
  10. Fordyce, R. E. 1994. Waipatia maerewhenua, new genus and new spe- cies (Waipatiidae, New Family), an archaic late Oligocene dolphin (Cetacea: Odontoceti: Platanistoidea) from New Zealand; pp. 147- 176 in A. Berta and T. De ´me `re, (eds.), Contributions in Marine Mammal Paleontology Honoring Frank C. Whitmore, Jr. Proceed- ings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29.
  11. Fordyce, R. E., and L. G. Barnes. 1994. The evolutionary history of whales and dolphins. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sci- ences 22:419-455.
  12. Fraser, N. C., and A. C. Dooley, Jr. 2000. A diverse marine vertebrate assemblage from a locality in the Calvert Formation of Virginia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 20(3, upplement):42A.
  13. Gatesy, J. 1998. Molecular evidence for the phylogenetic affinities of Cetacea; pp. 63-111 in J. G. M. Thewissen (ed.), Emergence of Whales. Plenum Press, New York.
  14. Geisler, J. H., and Z.-X. Luo. 1996. The petrosal and inner ear of Her- petocetus sp. (Mammalia: Cetacea) and their implications for the phylogeny and hearing of archaic mysticetes. Journal of Paleon- tology 70:1045-1066.
  15. Gottfried, M. D., D. J. Bohaska, and F. C. Whitmore, Jr. 1994. Miocene cetaceans of the Chesapeake Group; pp. 229-238 in A. Berta and T. De ´me `re (eds.), Contributions in Marine Mammal Paleontology Honoring Frank C. Whitmore, Jr. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29.
  16. Gray, J. E. 1864. On the Cetacea which have been observed in the seas surrounding the British Islands. Proceedings of the Zoological So- ciety of London 1864:195-248.
  17. Kellogg, A. R. 1922. Description of the skull of Megaptera miocaena, a fossil humpback whale from the Miocene diatomaceous earth of Lompoc, California. Proceedings of the United States National Mu- seum 6:1-18.
  18. Kellogg, A. R. 1936. A review of the Archaeoceti. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 482:1-366.
  19. Kellogg, A. R. 1965. A new whalebone whale from the Miocene Calvert Formation. United States National Museum Bulletin 247:1-45.
  20. Kellogg, A. R. 1968a. A hitherto unrecognized Calvert cetothere. U.S. National Museum Bulletin 247:133-161.
  21. Kellogg, A. R. 1968b. Supplement to description of Parietobalaena palmeri. United States National Museum Bulletin 247:175-197.
  22. Kellogg, A. R. 1969. Cetothere skeletons from the Miocene Choptank Formation of Maryland and Virginia. United States National Mu- seum Bulletin 294:1-40.
  23. Kimura, T., and T. Ozawa. 2002. A new cetothere (Cetacea: Mysticeti) from the early Miocene of Japan. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontol- ogy 22:684-702.
  24. Lace ´pe `de, B. G. 1804. Histoire Naturelle des Ce ´tace ´s, Paris, 412 pp.
  25. Li, W.-H. 1997. Molecular Evolution. Sinaur Associates, Inc., Sunder- land, Massachusetts, 432 pp.
  26. Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classis, ordines, genera, species cum characteribus, differentiis, syn- onymis, locis. Tenth ed. Vol. 1. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm, 824 pp.
  27. Luo, Z.-X., and E. R. Eastman. 1995. The petrosal and inner ear struc- tures of a squalodontoid whale: their implications on hearing evo- lution. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 15:431-422.
  28. Luo, Z.-X., and K. Marsh. 1996. The petrosal and inner ear structure of a fossil kogiine whale (Odontoceti, Mammalia). Journal of Ver- tebrate Paleontology 16:328-348.
  29. Marr, J. D., and L. W. Ward. 1993. Geology of the Caroline Stone Quarry. Virginia Explorer 9:7-10.
  30. McLeod, S. A., F. C. Whitmore, Jr., and L. G. Barnes. 1993. Evolu- tionary relationships and classification; pp. 45-70 in J. J. Burns, J. J. Montague, and C. J. Cowles (eds.), The Bowhead Whale. Society for Marine Mammalogy, Special Publication 2.
  31. Messenger, S. L., and J. A. McGuire. 1998. Morphology, molecules, and the phylogenetics of cetaceans. Systematic Biology 40:90-124.
  32. Milinkovitch, M. C., A. Meyer, and G. Ortı ´. 1994. Phylogeny of all major groups of cetaceans based on DNA sequences from three mitochon- drial genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 11:939-948.
  33. Milinkovitch, M. C., G. Ortı ´, and A. Meyer. 1993. Revised phylogeny of whales suggested by mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequence. Nature 361:346-348.
  34. Nikaido, M., F. Matsuno, H. Hamilton, R. L. Brownell, Jr., Y. Cao, W. Ding, Z. Zuoyan, A. M. Shedlock, R. E. Fordyce, M. Hasegawa, and N. Okada. 2001. Retroposon analysis of major cetacean line- ages: the monophyly of toothed whales and the paraphyly of river dolphins. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences 98: 7384-7389.
  35. Oishi, M., and Y. Hasegawa. 1994. Diversity of Pliocene mysticetes from eastern Japan. The Island Arc 3:436-452.
  36. Repenning, C. A., and R. H. Tedford. 1977. Otarioid seals of the Neo- gene.
  37. Swofford, D. 1998. PAUP 4.0b10 (Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsi- mony and Other Methods). Computer program distributed by Sin- auer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
  38. Tomilin, A. G. 1957. [Mammals of the U.S.S.R. and Adjacent Coun- tries. Vol. IX. Cetacea].
  39. Zveri S.S.S.R. i prilezhashchikh strain. IX. Kitoobraznye. Izadatel'stvo Akademii Nauk S.S.S.R., Moskva. 756 pp. [Russian].
  40. Ward, L. W. 1984. Stratigraphy of outcropping Tertiary beds along the Pamunkey River-central Virginia Coastal Plain; pp. 11-78 in L. W. Ward and K. Krafft (eds.), Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Outcropping Tertiary Beds in the Pamunkey River Region, Central Virginia Coastal Plain-Guidebook for Atlantic Coastal Plain Geo- logical Association 1984 Field Trip. Atlantic Coastal Plain Geolog- ical Association.
  41. Ward, L. W. 1992. Molluscan biostratigraphy of the Miocene, Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain of North America. Virginia Museum of Nat- ural History Memoir 2:1-159.
  42. Whitmore, F. C., Jr. 1994. Neogene climate change and the emergence of the modern whale fauna of the North Atlantic Ocean; pp. 223- 228 in A. Berta and T. De ´me `re (eds.), Contributions in Marine Mammal Paleontology Honoring Frank C. Whitmore, Jr. Proceed- ings of the San Diego Society of Natural History 29.
  43. Zeigler, C. V., G. L. Chan, and L. G. Barnes. 1997. A new late Miocene balaenopterid whale (Cetacea: Mysticeti), Parabalaenoptera bau- linensis, (new genus and species) from the Santa Cruz Mudstone, Point Reyes Peninsula, California. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 50:115-138.
  44. Character matrix for phylogenetic analysis. Character state descrip- tions are in Appendix 2. Missing or unknown data are indicated with ''?.'' Specimens and principal references are as follows: Basilosaurus, 1. Length of anterior process relative to promontorium: 60-80% (0); Ͻ50% (1);
  45. Ͼ90% (2).
  46. Lateral surface of anterior process: convex (0); flat (1); fossa or groove (2).
  47. Articulation of bulla with anterior process: none or small (0); pre- sent, with fovea epitubaria on anterior process (1); fused with ridge- like pedestal (2).
  48. Lateral projection of anterior process: absent (0); blade-like (1); robust (2); hypertrophied (3).
  49. Fusion of accessory ossicle with anterior process: absent (0); pre- sent (1).
  50. Groove for tensor tympani muscle: enlarged oval fossa (0); groove (1); groove absent or poorly defined (2).
  51. Hiatus epitympanicus: present (0); absent or poorly developed (1).
  52. Fossa for the malleus: present (0); partially defined (1); absent (2).
  53. Fossa incudis: present (0); absent (1).
  54. Ventrolateral tuberosity: present (0); absent (1).
  55. Groove on medial side of pars cochlearis: absent (0); present (1).
  56. Stylomastoid fossa: absent (0); present (1); enlarged, extending onto posterior side of pars cochlearis (2); enlarged, extending onto posterior process (3).
  57. Floor of stapedial muscle fossa: fully formed (0); partially formed (1).
  58. Ventrolateral ridge: absent (0); present (1); present and expanded (2).
  59. Dorsolateral ridge: present (0); absent (1); swollen and enlarged (2).
  60. Suprameatal area of petrosal: concave fossa (0); flat (1); convex (2).
  61. Depth and shape of fundus for internal acoustic meatus: shallow and ovoid (0); shallow and tear-drop shaped (1); deep and ovoid (2).
  62. Endocranial opening of facial canal: circular (0); with anterior fis- sure (1); deep and tubular (2).
  63. Separation of perilymphatic foramen from fenestra rotunda: wide (0); narrow (1); absent (2).
  64. Orientation of posterior process of petrosal: posterolateral relative to the longitudinal axis of pars cochlearis (0); at right angle to the longitudinal axis of pars cochlearis (1).
  65. Size of posterior process relative to promontorium: Ͻ70% (0); Ͼ100% (1).
  66. Constriction between posterior process of petrosal and pars coch- learis: constricted transversely (0); absent (1); constricted trans- versely and dorsoventrally (2).
  67. Contact of posterior process of petrosal with squamosal: corrugated suture (0); smooth surface (1); prominent flange (2).
  68. Posterolateral extension of facial nerve sulcus: on ventral side of posterior process of tympanic and short (0); absent (1); on ventral surface of compound posterior process and long (2).
  69. Articulation of the posterior process of petrosal to posterior process of tympanic: suture (0); suture in juveniles, fused in adults (1).
  70. Posterior end of posterior process of petrosal: exposed in mastoid region (0); not exposed (1).
  71. Supraorbital process abruptly depressed relative to vertex absent (0); present (1).
  72. Coronoid process of mandible: prominent (0); reduced (1).
  73. Nasals: narrower than proximal end of premaxilla (0); wider than proximal end of premaxilla (1).
  74. Ascending processes of maxillae on vertex: absent (0); small (1); prominent (2).
  75. Skull arch: absent (0), Ͻ5 degrees (1); 10-20 degrees (2); Ͼ20 degrees (3).
  76. Dorsal margin of mandible: straight (0); moderately arched (1); strongly arched (2).
  77. Number of digits: five (0); four (1).
  78. Cervical vertebrae: all free (0); partially fused (1); all fused (2).
  79. Contact of maxilla with supraorbital process: suture (0); maxilla projects over supraorbital process (1); fissure with only partial con- tact (2).
  80. Exposure of frontals on midline: present (0); absent (1).
  81. Length of cervical series relative to precaudal series: Յ10% (0); Ͼ10% (1).
  82. Humerus length relative to radius: Ͼ100% (0); approximately 100% (1);
  83. Swollen dorsal posterior prominence of tympanic bulla: absent (0); present (1).
  84. Keel on tympanic bulla: absent (0); present (1).

FAQs

Papers
1
Followers
1
View all papers from Alton Dooleyarrow_forward

Related papers

A new species of rorqual whale (Cetacea, Mysticeti, Balaenopteridae) from the Late Miocene of the Southern North Sea Basin and the role of the North Atlantic in the paleobiogeography of Archaebalaenoptera

PeerJ

Background The rich fossil record of rorqual and humpback whales (Cetacea, Mysticeti, Balaenopteridae) is mainly characterized by monotypic genera since genera including more than one species are extremely rare. The discovery of new species belonging to known genera would be of great importance in order to better understand ancestor-descendant relationships and paleobiogeographic patterns in this diverse group. Recent discoveries in the southern North Sea Basin yielded a number of reasonably well preserved fossil balaenopterids from the Late Miocene; this sample includes a balaenopterid skull from Liessel, The Netherlands, which shares key characters with Archaebalaenoptera castriarquati from the Pliocene of Mediterranean. This skull is permanently held by Oertijdmuseum, Boxtel, The Netherlands, with the number MAB002286 and is investigated here. Methods A detailed comparative anatomical analysis of the skull MAB002286 is performed in order to understand its relationships. The age o...

The cochlea of the enigmatic pygmy right whale Caperea marginata informs mysticete phylogeny

The pygmy right whale, Caperea marginata, is the least understood extant baleen whale (Cetacea, Mysticeti). Knowledge on its basic anatomy, ecology, and fossil record is limited, even though its singular position outside both balaenids (right whales) and balaenopteroids (rorquals 1 grey whales) gives Caperea a pivotal role in mysticete evolution. Recent investigations of the cetacean cochlea have provided new insights into sensory capabilities and phylogeny. Here, we extend this advance to Caperea by describing, for the first time, the inner ear of this enigmatic species. The cochlea is large and appears to be sensitive to low-frequency sounds, but its hearing limit is relatively high. The presence of a well-developed tympanal recess links Caperea with cetotheriids and balaenopteroids, rather than balaenids, contrary to the traditional morphological view of a close Caperea-balaenid relationship. Nevertheless, a broader sample of the cetotheriid Herpetocetus demonstrates that the presence of a tympanal recess can be variable at the specific and possibly even the intraspecific level. We describe the cochlea of the pygmy right whale. The cochlea is large and sensitive to low-frequency sounds. Possession of a tympanal recess links Caperea with Plicogulae (cetotheriids and balaenopteroids). However, this feature may be more variable than previously thought.

Dental and Basicranial Anatomy of a Late Middle Eocene Protocetid Cetacean from the Southeastern United States

The Paleontological Society Special Publications, 1996

The partial skeleton of a new genus and species of protocetid cetacean was collected from Burke County in the Upper Coastal Plain of Georgia. Its age, based on associated calcareous nannoplankton and mollusks, is early Bartonian, ca. 39-41 Ma. It is thus approximately contemporaneous with the Egyptian Eocetus schweinfurthi and the oldest basilosaurids, and considerably younger than all other described protocetids. About 60 skeletal elements of a single individual were recovered, including the skull, left ramus, pelvis, 12 ribs, and 23 vertebrae. The specimen is informally designated the Vogtle whale, named after its locality, the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant. Its phylogenetic position was determined by parsimony analysis to be: (Pakicetus (Rodhocetus (Protocetus (Vogtle whale (Eocetus, Basilosauridae))))). Important dental characters of the Vogtle whale include double-rooted PI and pi, prominent cingulae, strongly wrinkled and ornamented enamel (heaviest on P2 and P3), and triple-rooted upper molars. The carinae of the upper cheek teeth (except the PI) possess small, blunt accessory cuspules; these are strongest and most numerous on the P3 and P4. These are interpreted as homologous with the larger, sharper accessory cusps characteristic of basilosaurid cheek teeth. The talonid of the lower molars bears a single, tall, laterally compressed cusp, the hypoconid; it is separated from the massive protoconid by a vertical, carnivore-like carnassial notch. The p4 also has a similar but smaller hypoconid. Large wear facets reveal that the lingual surfaces of the main cusps of the P4-M3 occluded with the labial surfaces of the p4-m3, forming a continuous series of carnassial-like shearing blades. The more anteriorly located teeth show only apical wear. In contrast, the basicranial region of the Vogtle whale's skull for the most part plesiomorphically resembles that ofProtocetus and other Lutetian protocetids. The bulla is attached to the basicranium at three points, including a robust, syndesmotic articulation with the paroccipital process. There is a narrow but extensive peribullar sinus isolating the promontorium from contact with the exoccipital and basioccipital, but no true pterygoid fossa, only a shallow depression formed on the alisphenoid and pterygoid. The ventral surface of the promontorium is mostly flat. The fenestra vestibuli opens laterally and is not visible in ventral view. Often known basicranial apomorphies distinguishing basilosaurid cetaceans from Protocetus, the Vogtle whale shares only one with the former, an enlarged stapedial fossa. Numerous recent discoveries of early cetaceans from Pakistan, northwestern India, and Africa have greatly narrowed the morphologic gap between terrestrial mammals (i.e., mesonychids) and Protocetus, which for. a long time was the oldest known whale. But no morphologic intermediaries between Protocetus and the next grade of cetacean evolution, the basilosaurids, were known except for a very limited number of specimens referred to Eocetus and Pappocetus. Analysis of the morphology of the Vogtle whale from the dual perspectives of phylogeny and functional anatomy permits a fuller understanding of the protocetid-basilosaurid transition. This is one of the critical steps in cetacean evolution, since it here that they became fully aquatic.

Evidence for convergent evolution of ultrasonic hearing in toothed whales (Cetacea: Odontoceti)

Biology Letters

Toothed whales (Cetacea: Odontoceti) are the most diverse group of modern cetaceans, originating during the Eocene/Oligocene transition approximately 38 Ma. All extant odontocetes echolocate; a single origin for this behaviour is supported by a unique facial source for ultrasonic vocalizations and a cochlea adapted for hearing the corresponding echoes. The craniofacial and inner ear morphology of Oligocene odontocetes support a rapid (less than 5 Myr) early evolution of echolocation. Although some cranial features in the stem odontocetes Simocetus and Olympicetus suggest an ability to generate ultrasonic sound, until now, the bony labyrinths of taxa of this grade have not been investigated. Here, we use µCT to examine a petrosal of a taxon with clear similarities to Olympicetus avitus . Measurements of the bony labyrinth, when added to an extensive dataset of cetartiodactyls, resulted in this specimen sharing a morphospace with stem whales, suggesting a transitional inner ear. This ...

The Comparative Osteology of the Petrotympanic Complex (Ear Region) of Extant Baleen Whales (Cetacea: Mysticeti)

PLoS ONE, 2011

Background: Anatomical comparisons of the ear region of baleen whales (Mysticeti) are provided through detailed osteological descriptions and high-resolution photographs of the petrotympanic complex (tympanic bulla and petrosal bone) of all extant species of mysticete cetaceans. Salient morphological features are illustrated and identified, including overall shape of the bulla, size of the conical process of the bulla, morphology of the promontorium, and the size and shape of the anterior process of the petrosal. We place our comparative osteological observations into a phylogenetic context in order to initiate an exploration into petrotympanic evolution within Mysticeti.

A phylogenetic blueprint for a modern whale

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2013

The emergence of Cetacea in the Paleogene represents one of the most profound macroevolutionary transitions within Mammalia. The move from a terrestrial habitat to a committed aquatic lifestyle engendered wholesale changes in anatomy, physiology, and behavior. The results of this remarkable transformation are extant whales that include the largest, biggest brained, fastest swimming, loudest, deepest diving mammals, some of which can detect prey with a sophisticated echolocation system (Odontoceti-toothed whales), and others that batch feed using racks of baleen (Mysticeti-baleen whales). A broad-scale reconstruction of the evolutionary remodeling that culminated in extant cetaceans has not yet been based on integration of genomic and paleontological information. Here, we first place Cetacea relative to extant mammalian diversity, and assess the distribution of support among molecular datasets for relationships within Artiodactyla (even-toed ungulates, including Cetacea). We then merge trees derived from three large concatenations of molecular and fossil data to yield a composite hypothesis that encompasses many critical events in the evolutionary history of Cetacea. By combining diverse evidence, we infer a phylogenetic blueprint that outlines the stepwise evolutionary development of modern whales. This hypothesis represents a starting point for more detailed, comprehensive phylogenetic reconstructions in the future, and also highlights the synergistic interaction between modern (genomic) and traditional (morphological + paleontological) approaches that ultimately must be exploited to provide a rich understanding of evolutionary history across the entire tree of Life.

Taphonomy, osteology and functional morphology of a partially articulated skeleton of an archaic Pliocene right whale from Emilia Romagna (NW Italy

Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 2023

A partial skeleton of a Pliocene balaenid whale (Mammalia, Cetacea, Mysticeti) is described and compared to a large set of extant and fossil Balaenidae. The specimen (MCRE 232834) includes a jugal, both mandibular rami and part of the postcranial skeleton including several vertebrae, complete ribs, hyoid, pelvis, a single scapula and a single partial forelimb. The specimen was found at a site in the vicinity of the San Valentino Castle, about 16 km S from Reggio Emilia, close to the town of Castellarano, Emilia Romagna (northern Italy). Molluscs and foraminifers indicate a late Zanclean age for MCRE 232834, constrained between 3.8 and 3.6 Ma. A taphonomic analysis revealed that after death the individual sunk on the sea floor upside down and underwent a series of biostratinomic processes eventually leading to the collapse of the ribcage and to the disarticulation of the posterior thoracic, lumbar and caudal vertebrae, together with the loss of several skeletal elements including the skull. Shark teeth and encrusting molluscs demonstrate that the specimen was exploited by different organisms during its decay. The study of the skeleton revealed that MCRE 232834 shows an abruptly converging anterior ends of the mandibular rami, well-developed olecranon process in the ulna, peculiar morphology of the cervical vertebrae and enlarged attachment sites for axial muscles in the ribs. Based on the morphology of the cervical vertebrae, mandible and scapula, MCRE 232834 can be assigned to a new genus and species of the family Balaenidae, i.e., Charadrobalaena valentinae n. gen., n. sp., which is part of a primitive clade of balaenids that is the sister group of the crown balaenid whales. A functional analysis of the vertebral column revealed that it was able of comparatively faster and more agile swimming with respect to the extant balaenid species.

Transition of eocene whales from land to sea: evidence from bone microstructure

PloS one, 2015

Cetacea are secondarily aquatic amniotes that underwent their land-to-sea transition during the Eocene. Primitive forms, called archaeocetes, include five families with distinct degrees of adaptation to an aquatic life, swimming mode and abilities that remain difficult to estimate. The lifestyle of early cetaceans is investigated by analysis of microanatomical features in postcranial elements of archaeocetes. We document the internal structure of long bones, ribs and vertebrae in fifteen specimens belonging to the three more derived archaeocete families - Remingtonocetidae, Protocetidae, and Basilosauridae - using microtomography and virtual thin-sectioning. This enables us to discuss the osseous specializations observed in these taxa and to comment on their possible swimming behavior. All these taxa display bone mass increase (BMI) in their ribs, which lack an open medullary cavity, and in their femora, whereas their vertebrae are essentially spongious. Humeri and femora show oppos...

Related topics

Cited by

A NEW BASAL BALAENOPTERID WHALE FROM THE PLIOCENE OF NORTHERN ITALY

Palaeontology, 2007

Abstract: A new basal balaenopterid genus and species, Archaebalaenoptera castriarquati, is described and compared with all the living and fossil members of the family Balaenopteridae and related fossil rorqual-like taxa. It was found in the Lower Pliocene of northern Italy, and is characterized by a supraoccipital with a transversely compressed anterior process, the zygomatic process of the squamosal diverging from the longitudinal axis of the skull, very long nasal bones, and subtle exposition of the parietal on the dorsal wall of the skull. It is primitive in having a maxilla with a long ascending process that is posteriorly unexpanded and round, and a dentary that is straight and not bowed outward, unlike that of living Balaenopteridae. In particular, the discovery of this new genus suggests that, among the early members of Balaenopteridae, the acquisition of the typical sutural pattern shown by maxilla, frontal, parietal and supraoccipital preceded the acquisition of the feeding-related traits that are characteristic of the family. The primitive morphology of the feeding-related structures of A. castriarquati (i.e. the straight dentary and the flat glenoid fossa of the squamosal) suggests that this whale was unable to undertake the intermittent ram feeding typical of Balaenopteridae as efficiently as living members of the family.

The More the Merrier? A Large Cladistic Analysis of Mysticetes, and Comments on the Transition from Teeth to Baleen

Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 2011

The origin of baleen whales, and their specialized mode of filter-feeding, marks an important event in the evolutionary history of mammals that gave rise to one of the most distinctive groups of animals alive today. Recent years have seen the description of a number of important new specimens, as well as the publication of a large number of phylogenetic analyses. Yet, despite this great effort, a broad consensus on even the most fundamental relationships within this group has so far remained elusive, a fact perhaps most strikingly reflected in the ongoing debate regarding the taxonomic placement of the extant gray and pygmy right whales, as well as the question of the relative closeness of relationship of all the extant members of the mysticete crown group. Here, I present the taxonomically most comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of extinct and extant baleen whales carried out to date, based on morphological data and utilizing both maximum parsimony and Bayesian methodologies. The results of this study were well resolved and consistent across methodologies. Apart from recovering a clade comprising the pygmy right whale, gray whales, and rorquals, a grouping new to morphological analyses but supported by a number of molecular studies, this investigation also revealed the former clade to be more closely related to a large number of extinct species than to right whales, thus contradicting previous notions of a closely related mysticete crown group. In addition, this analysis also identified a novel clade comprising nearly all the described archaic toothed mysticetes from the late Oligocene (about 23–28 Ma) to the exclusion of all toothless mysticetes. This finding is consistent with a basic assessment of the functional morphology of toothed mysticete vision, and may have implications for the evolution of mysticete filter-feeding and the recently proposed interpretation of some of these archaic taxa as transitional forms possessing both teeth and baleen at the same time.

Fossils Impact as Hard as Living Taxa in Parsimony Analyses of Morphology

Systematic Biology, 2007

Systematists disagree whether data from fossils should be included in parsimony analyses. In a handful of well-documented cases, the addition of fossil data radically overturns a hypothesis of relationships based on extant taxa alone. Fossils can break up long branches and preserve character combinations closer in time to deep splitting events. However, fossils usually require more interpretation than extant taxa, introducing greater potential for spurious codings. Moreover, because fossils often have more "missing" codings, they are frequently accused of increasing numbers of MPTs, frustrating resolution and reducing support. Despite the controversy, remarkably little is known about the effects of fossils more generally. Here we provide the first systematic study, investigating empirically the behavior of fossil and extant taxa in 45 published morphological data sets. First-order jackknifing is used to determine the effects that each terminal has on inferred relationships, on the number of MPTs, and on CF and RI as measures of homoplasy. Bootstrap leaf stabilities provide a proxy for the contribution of individual taxa to the branch support in the rest of the tree. There is no significant difference in the impact of fossil versus extant taxa on relationships, numbers of MPTs, and CF or RI. However, adding individual fossil taxa is more likely to reduce the total branch support of the tree than adding extant taxa. This must be weighed against the superior taxon sampling afforded by including judiciously coded fossils, providing data from otherwise unsampled regions of the tree. We therefore recommend that investigators should include fossils, in the absence of compelling and case specific reasons for their exclusion.

👁 Academia
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104