Voozh

%PDF-1.2 %�� 1 0 obj << /CreationDate (D:20060426114836) /Producer (Acrobat Distiller 3.0 for Power Macintosh) /Keywords () /Subject (journal 3.1 Osaghae) /Creator (Adobe PageMaker 6.5) /Title (journal 3.1 Osaghae) /Author (Sue Sandrock) >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Length 3749 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 422.88 642.07 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs 0.001 Tc (123)Tj -36.048 -0.132 TD (V)Tj 7 0 0 7 69.6 640.75 Tm 0 Tc (OLUME)Tj 10 0 0 10 95.64 640.75 Tm 0 Tw ( 4 N)Tj 7 0 0 7 116.52 640.75 Tm (O)Tj 10 0 0 10 122.04 640.75 Tm ( 2)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 62.4 637.99 m 437.88 637.99 l S /CS1 cs 0 scn /CS1 CS 0 SCN 0.96 w 1000 M 42.43 660.52 404.94 -36.44 re B* BT 10 0 0 10 243.36 26.59 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs 0.001 Tc (123)Tj 16 0 0 16 63.6 610.27 Tm 0 Tc [(ZIMBABWE\325S 2005 P)93(ARLIAMENT)74(AR)43(Y)14( ELECTIONS)]TJ /F11 1 Tf 1.657 -1.253 TD (Lessons for the Movement for Democratic Change)Tj 14 0 0 14 243.12 559.39 Tm (By)Tj -3.926 -1.14 TD -0.001 Tw [(Sehlar)10(e Makgetlaneng)]TJ /F9 1 Tf 10.5 0 0 10.5 81.6 502.15 Tm 0 Tw [(Dr Makgetlaneng is Head of Southern )36(Africa Pr)13(ogramme of )43(Ar)7(ea Studies)]TJ 7.989 -1.291 TD [(at the )39(Africa Institute of South )39(Africa)]TJ 2.594 -1.28 TD [(PO Box 630 Pr)15(etoria 0001)]TJ -9.337 -1.291 TD [(T)99(el: + 27$0$12 304 9700; Fax: +27$0$12 326 1786; Mobile: 072 263 5167)]TJ 1.074 -1.28 TD [(e-mail: sehlar)16(e@ai.or)19(g.za $work$; sehlar)18(e@telkomsa.net $home$)]TJ 13 0 0 13 225.24 394.15 Tm (A)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 235.44 394.15 Tm (BSTRACT)Tj /F11 1 Tf 10.5 0 0 10.5 79.32 367.15 Tm 0.05 Tw [(The paper analyses the theor)13(etical and practical weaknesses of the Movement for)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.008 Tw [(Democratic Change $MDC$, the main opposition political party in Zimbabwe. T)110(o)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.047 Tw [(do justice to its struggle for political power)76(, the MDC must wage a decisive war)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.015 Tw [(against these weaknesses, which ar)17(e among the key r)16(easons why it lost the Mar)24(ch)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.007 Tc -0.062 Tw [(2005 parliamentary elections and ar)13(e important challenges it is facing in its struggle)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.121 Tw [(to defeat the ruling Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Fr)16(ont $Zanu-)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.06 Tw [(PF$. In focusing on these weaknesses the paper makes extensive use of the literatur)14(e)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.035 Tw [(pr)21(oduced by critics of the ruling party)28(. The paper maintains that the MDC has not)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.026 Tw [(r)12(ecognised either in theory or in practice the strategic importance of mobilising for)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.01 Tc -0.063 Tw [(political, economic and ideological hegemony and has failed to pr)8(ovide compr)19(ehensive)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.097 Tw [(theor)9(etical and practical alternatives to the ruling party as pr)28(er)13(equisites for the)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.012 Tw [(r)12(ealisation of its aim to r)27(eplace it. As a r)16(esult, the paper concludes, the MDC faces)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.026 Tw [(the danger of being r)14(educed to exerting pr)22(essur)10(e upon the state of Zimbabwe and)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.057 Tw (other Southern African countries for policy changes and victories which will not be)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0.04 Tw (sufficient for it either to achieve political power or to consolidate or expand these)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw (changes and victories.)Tj /F9 1 Tf 13 0 0 13 213.6 124.15 Tm (I)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 217.92 124.15 Tm (NTRODUCTION)Tj 10.5 0 0 10.5 62.4 103.63 Tm 0.044 Tw (The MDC has been chosen for this case study because, since its formation, it has)Tj T* 0.087 Tw [(posed a mor)23(e serious thr)17(eat to Zanu-PF r)10(ule than any other political party and,)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.025 Tw [(with the r)12(uling party)108(, is one of two major parties in the country and the only one)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.077 Tw [(apart fr)18(om Zanu-PF to have fielded candidates for all 120 contested seats in the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.089 Tw (parliamentary elections. The other parties \320 the Zimbabwe People\325s Democratic)Tj ET endstream endobj 4 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R /F11 6 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> /ColorSpace << /CS1 9 0 R >> >> endobj 9 0 obj [/Separation /All /DeviceGray 11 0 R] endobj 13 0 obj << /Length 5280 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 292.66 642.19 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs (J)Tj 7 0 0 7 295.9 642.19 Tm (OURNAL)Tj 10 0 0 10 327.1 642.19 Tm ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 329.5 642.19 Tm (OF)Tj 10 0 0 10 338.86 642.19 Tm -0.046 Tc 0 Tw ( A)Tj 7 0 0 7 348.7 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (FRICAN)Tj 10 0 0 10 375.82 642.19 Tm -0.009 Tc ( E)Tj 7 0 0 7 384.46 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (LECTIONS)Tj 10 0 0 10 41.02 642.07 Tm 0.001 Tc (124)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 41.62 637.99 m 419.5 637.99 l S BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 42.46 606.07 Tm /GS2 gs 0.004 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Party)105(, the Zimbabwe )42(African National Union-Ndonga $Zanu-Ndonga$ and the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.022 Tw [(Zimbabwe )17(Y)84(outh in )37(Alliance, which took part in the Mar)18(ch 2005 elections, and the)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.041 Tw [(Conservative )38(Alliance of Zimbabwe, the International Socialist Or)9(ganisation and)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.12 Tw [(the National )29(Alliance for Good Governance ar)19(e minor parties. The MDC is the)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw [(of)10(ficial opposition and is r)22(epr)12(esented in both houses of Parliament.)]TJ 2.171 -1.28 TD -0.017 Tw [(The r)16(uling party won the 2005 elections with an incr)17(eased majority)113(, taking 78)]TJ -2.171 -1.291 TD -0.003 Tc -0.063 Tw [(seats to the MDC\325s 41 and, accor)9(ding to the Zimbabwe Election Commission $ZEC$,)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.001 Tw [(winning nearly 60 per cent of the vote, an incr)18(ease of 1)49(1)0( per cent over its showing)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.084 Tw (in the 2000 elections in which it won 62 seats to the MDC\325s 57. Jonathan Moyo,)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0.004 Tc 0.125 Tw (former Minister of Information, who contested the election as an independent)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0.034 Tc [(candidate, was the only independent to win a seat, taking the T)91(sholotsho)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.005 Tw [(constituency fr)16(om the MDC. The MDC\325s shar)21(e of the vote decr)17(eased by 9 per cent)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.012 Tw [(to 39 per cent. W)47(ith an additional 30 seats allocated by the pr)16(esident to the r)15(uling)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.039 Tw [(party)104(, Zanu-PF occupied 108 of the 150 seats \320 mor)26(e than the two-thir)7(ds majority it)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.001 Tw (needed to change the Constitution.)Tj 2.171 -1.28 TD -0.006 Tc -0.062 Tw [(Responding to the r)20(esults, the MDC, citing massive inconsistencies, demanded)]TJ -2.171 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.058 Tw [(new elections under a new constitution, contending that elections could not be fr)9(ee)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.073 Tw [(and fair in the curr)18(ent socio-political and economic situation. It also maintained)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.006 Tw [(that it had won 94 seats and not the 41 allocated by the ZEC. However)68(, it did not)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.005 Tc -0.063 Tw [(specify how a new constitution should be drafted and appr)15(oved, how new elections)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw [(should be conducted or how it calculated the figur)10(e of 94 seats.)]TJ 6.1 0 0 6.1 334.42 339.55 Tm (1)Tj 10.5 0 0 10.5 65.26 322.63 Tm -0.051 Tw [(The pattern of the r)30(esults of the 2005 elections is essentially the same as that of)]TJ -2.171 -1.291 TD -0.053 Tw [(the 2000 elections. The MDC won almost all the seats in the main cities, Harar)16(e and)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.027 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Bulawayo, wher)16(e civil society or)20(ganisations ar)15(e r)15(elatively ef)18(fective in their)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.124 Tw [(opposition to the ruling party)115(. It also won a majority of seats in Matebeleland,)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.025 Tw [(wher)16(e Ndebeles who had supported Zanu under the leadership of Joshua Nkomo)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.029 Tc 0.125 Tw [(continue to oppose the Shona-dominated ruling party)115(. Zanu-PF won over)19(-)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.002 Tc [(whelmingly in r)7(ural Mashonaland, wher)15(e the majority of the population lives.)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.051 Tw [(Emmerson Mnangagwa, Speaker of the pr)13(evious Parliament, lost his Kwekwe seat)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.018 Tw (to Blessing Chebundo of the MDC. Jonathan Moyo\325s victory in the elections was a)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0.003 Tc 0.125 Tw [(loss for the MDC. )35(Another significant loss was the Chimanimani constituency)116(,)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.015 Tw (contested by Heather Bennett, wife of Roy Bennett, the former MDC MP jailed for)Tj 0 -1.291 TD -0.05 Tw [(assaulting two Cabinet members in Parliament in May 2004. $Bennett was r)13(eleased)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.079 Tw [(fr)8(om prison on 28 June 2005 after serving eight months of a one-year sentence.$)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.004 Tc -0.063 Tw [(The 16 seats lost by the opposition party wer)16(e all in r)11(ural ar)19(eas. In the 2000 elections,)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.076 Tw (the MDC had won all 15 seats in Matebeleland and the majority of urban seats,)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0.087 Tw [(with the r)9(uling party winning the majority of rural seats. The two main cities \320)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.062 Tw [(Harar)16(e, with a majority Shona population, and Bulawayo, with a majority Ndebele)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw (population \320 voted overwhelmingly for the MDC.)Tj ET /GS3 gs 42.46 57.55 m 419.5 57.55 l S BT 7 0 0 7 42.46 47.95 Tm /GS2 gs (1)Tj 8 0 0 8 56.62 47.95 Tm -0.012 Tc -0.062 Tw [(The MDC\325s claims ar)9(e disputed and r)20(ejected by Munyaradzi Gwisai, a former MDC Member of Parliament.)]TJ 0 -1.245 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (See Gwisai 2005, p 8.)Tj ET endstream endobj 14 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 16 0 obj << /Length 5464 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 422.88 642.07 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs 0.001 Tc (125)Tj -36.048 -0.132 TD (V)Tj 7 0 0 7 69.6 640.75 Tm 0 Tc (OLUME)Tj 10 0 0 10 95.64 640.75 Tm 0 Tw ( 4 N)Tj 7 0 0 7 116.52 640.75 Tm (O)Tj 10 0 0 10 122.04 640.75 Tm ( 2)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 62.4 637.99 m 437.88 637.99 l S BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 85.08 606.07 Tm /GS2 gs -0.006 Tc -0.063 Tw (This pattern suggests that ethnicity is becoming less important in Zimbabwean)Tj -2.16 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.021 Tw [(politics and that policies, not ethnicity)120(, drive political contest in the country)109(, with)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.004 Tc -0.062 Tw [(the main dividing line being r)10(ural-urban. The r)13(uling party has failed to win support)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.003 Tc -0.063 Tw [(fr)25(om the urban working class and middle class. The MDC, supported by developed)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.008 Tw [(countries and white Zimbabweans, has failed to win support in the r)18(ural ar)11(eas. It)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.073 Tw [(has also failed to pr)16(ovide shr)21(ewd political leadership and viable theor)25(etical and)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.06 Tw [(practical alternatives to the r)9(uling party)114(. It is viewed as the or)19(ganisational means of)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.001 Tc -0.063 Tw [(r)28(eversing the impr)10(ovements made since political independence, including the land)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.055 Tw [(r)29(edistribution pr)14(ogramme. While the ruling party supports the active r)19(ole of the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.122 Tw [(state in the management and dir)23(ection of the economy)110(, the MDC defends neo-)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw (liberal socio-economic policies.)Tj 2.16 -1.28 TD 0.021 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Zimbabwe\325s adoption and implementation of the str)6(uctural adjustment)]TJ -2.16 -1.291 TD 0.038 Tc [(pr)21(ogramme in the 1990s which substantially r)18(eversed the socio-economic)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.014 Tc [(impr)20(ovements achieved since political independence and the socio-economic)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.035 Tc [(pr)26(oblems the country faced in the 1990s not only led to mass strikes and)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.044 Tw [(demonstrations but also to an alliance of various social for)25(ces and or)19(ganisations,)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.049 Tw [(which led to the formation of the MDC $Danser)23(eau 2003, pp 181-85; )45(Andr)11(easson)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tw (2003, pp 393-97; Sachikonye 2000-2001, p 7$.)Tj 2.16 -1.291 TD 0.078 Tw [(The MDC became the beneficiary of demands by popular social for)21(ces and)]TJ -2.16 -1.28 TD -0.021 Tw [(or)27(ganisations that the state solve these pr)18(oblems and of the state\325s failur)19(e to do so.)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.088 Tw [(These ar)27(e some of the key r)20(easons for the party\325s achievements in the 2000 and)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.005 Tw [(2002 elections \320 achievements which have now been substantially r)24(eversed. Since)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.005 Tc -0.063 Tw [(2003 the MDC has failed to pr)28(ove that it is politically capable of solving Zimbabwe\325s)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw [(socio-economic pr)22(oblems.)]TJ 13 0 0 13 93.48 262.63 Tm (E)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 101.4 262.63 Tm (VIDENCE)Tj 13 0 0 13 143.28 262.63 Tm ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 146.52 262.63 Tm [(THA)73(T)]TJ 13 0 0 13 171.6 262.63 Tm ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 174.84 262.63 Tm (THE)Tj 13 0 0 13 193.56 262.63 Tm ( MDC W)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 244.68 262.63 Tm (OULD)Tj 13 0 0 13 271.44 262.63 Tm ( L)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 282.72 262.63 Tm (OSE)Tj 13 0 0 13 300.24 262.63 Tm ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 303.48 262.63 Tm (THE)Tj 13 0 0 13 322.2 262.63 Tm ( 2005 E)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 362.64 262.63 Tm (LECTIONS)Tj 10.5 0 0 10.5 62.4 242.11 Tm -0.011 Tc -0.062 Tw [(The economic pr)21(oblems, corruption and mismanagement which plagued Zimbabwe)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.013 Tc 0.125 Tw [(in 2004 wer)26(e no indication that the MDC would win the 2005 parliamentary)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.012 Tc -0.062 Tw [(elections. In early 2004 its four Harar)17(e)0( councillors, including the acting mayor)80(, Sekayi)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.035 Tw [(Makavara, left the party)119(, citing leadership pr)18(oblems as the key r)15(eason behind their)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.017 Tw [(decision. The r)7(uling party defeated the MDC in a key by-election in Zengeza, the)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.007 Tc -0.063 Tw [(township near Harar)23(e, in the Chitungwiza ar)23(ea, str)10(onghold of the MDC. The MDC\325s)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.027 Tw [(supporters and loyalists maintained that poor or)24(ganisation, a weak candidate and)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.012 Tw [(infighting within the leadership wer)25(e key r)18(easons why Christopher Chigumba of)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.039 Tw [(Zanu-PF won 8 744 votes to the 6 706 for James Makor)24(e of the MDC in the 27-28)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.003 Tc -0.063 Tw [(Mar)26(ch by-election. In the 2002 elections, Chigumba had been defeated by T)96(afadzwa)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.061 Tw (Musekiwa of the MDC by 14 814 votes to 5 330. Musekiwa left for London after)Tj 0 -1.291 TD -0.019 Tw [(several alleged thr)25(eats on his life. This led to a by-election in Zengeza. Local MDC)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.053 Tw [(supporters maintained that they wer)24(e betrayed by Musekiwa\325s decision to leave)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.052 Tw [(and wer)22(e not happy about the imposition of Makor)18(e as the party\325s candidate in the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.004 Tw [(election. It was r)19(eported that voters wer)21(e questioning the MDC\325s failur)23(e seriously)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.021 Tw [(to challenge the r)14(uling party and that morale was so low that the majority of them)]TJ ET endstream endobj 17 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 19 0 obj << /Length 5009 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 292.66 642.19 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs (J)Tj 7 0 0 7 295.9 642.19 Tm (OURNAL)Tj 10 0 0 10 327.1 642.19 Tm ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 329.5 642.19 Tm (OF)Tj 10 0 0 10 338.86 642.19 Tm -0.046 Tc 0 Tw ( A)Tj 7 0 0 7 348.7 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (FRICAN)Tj 10 0 0 10 375.82 642.19 Tm -0.009 Tc ( E)Tj 7 0 0 7 384.46 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (LECTIONS)Tj 10 0 0 10 41.02 642.07 Tm 0.001 Tc (126)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 41.62 637.99 m 419.5 637.99 l S 0 0 0 0.15 k 0 0 0 0.15 K 1000 M 42.74 103.91 376.57 -15.27 re B* 42.74 215.61 376.57 -22.17 re B* BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 42.46 606.07 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs 0.006 Tc 0.125 Tw [(concluded that it would be pointless to contest elections under the pr)19(evailing)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw [(electoral r)7(ules $)]TJ /F11 1 Tf 6.766 0 TD (Africa Confidential)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.771 0 TD ( 2004a, p 2$.)Tj /F11 1 Tf -12.366 -1.291 TD 0.034 Tw (Africa Confidential)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.794 0 TD [( pr)12(ovided overwhelming evidence immediately befor)23(e the)]TJ -9.966 -1.28 TD -0.007 Tc -0.063 Tw (2005 elections that the ruling party would win, suggesting that the political situation)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.109 Tw (in Zimbabwe had changed in favour of the ruling party in 2004. While in 2000)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0.063 Tw (people wanted Zanu-PF out because of the deteriorating economy and they still)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0.115 Tw (wanted \324Mugabe and his allies\325 out in 2004, \324many\325 people \324hope that Zanu-PF)Tj 0 -1.28 TD -0.003 Tc -0.062 Tw [(with a new leader would be less destabilising than a switch to the opposition\325 party)102(.)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.111 Tw [(Ther)12(e had been economic impr)23(ovements since 2004, with pr)14(oducts which wer)24(e)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.001 Tc 0.125 Tw [(scar)18(ce becoming available. The MDC launched its 2005 election campaign late,)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.02 Tw (having earlier insisted that it would boycott the elections. Many of its supporters)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0.011 Tc 0.125 Tw [(failed to r)11(egister and, as the economic pr)25(oblems intensified, voters showed a)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.067 Tw [(pr)13(efer)17(ence for candidates who claimed they wer)23(e able to impr)10(ove their material)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.002 Tc -0.063 Tw (conditions. MDC Members of Parliament had done little for their constituents since)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (winning the 2000 parliamentary elections $)Tj /F11 1 Tf 18.857 0 TD (Africa Confidential)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.76 0 TD ( 2005, p 1$.)Tj -24.446 -1.28 TD -0.015 Tw [(Befor)21(e the 2005 elections, )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 11.257 0 TD (Africa Confidential)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.749 0 TD [( for)11(ecast that the MDC might win)]TJ -21.177 -1.291 TD -0.045 Tw [(49 seats and that should it win fewer than 49, the r)7(uling party would have the two-)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.041 Tw [(thir)17(ds majority it was seeking $2005, p 2$. It believed the MDC would win all seven)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.004 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Bulawayo seats, all the seats in Matebeleland North except T)83(sholotsho and all)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.002 Tc -0.062 Tw [(18 Harar)12(e)8( seats. It might face pr)13(oblems in Zengeza and it was possible that it would)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.04 Tw [(win six of the seven Matebeleland South seats, thr)11(ee urban Manicaland East and)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.036 Tw [(Central seats, one Chimanimani seat, two or thr)15(ee seats in Mashonaland W)87(est, one)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.023 Tw [(or two urban seats in Mavingo and thr)19(ee seats in the Midlands $2005, pp 1-2$. This)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.059 Tw [(for)17(ecast was borne out by the r)21(esults of the elections, with the MDC winning 41)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw [(seats and Zanu-PF 78 $see T)86(able 1$.)]TJ /F13 1 Tf 16.343 -3.84 TD -0.002 Tw [(T)118(able 1)]TJ -9.577 -1.28 TD 0 Tw (Results of 31 March 2005 Parliamentary Elections)Tj 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 201.31 Tm [(Party/Independents)-5565(No of V)116(otes)-3192(% of V)97(otes)-2925(No of Seats)-1599(% of Seats)]TJ ET 0 0 0 1 K 10 M /GS3 gs 42.46 193.51 m 419.5 193.51 l 42.46 174.19 m 419.5 174.19 l S BT /F9 1 Tf 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 181.03 Tm /GS2 gs -0.001 Tw [(Zanu-PF)-11380(1 569 867)-5137(59, 59)-6626(78)-4965(60)]TJ ET /GS3 gs 42.46 156.67 m 419.5 156.67 l S BT 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 163.51 Tm /GS2 gs [(MDC)-12801(1 041 292)-5137(39, 52)-6626(41)-4965(40)]TJ ET /GS3 gs 42.46 139.15 m 419.5 139.15 l S BT 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 145.99 Tm /GS2 gs 0.001 Tw [(Zanu-NDONGA)-9532(6 608)-5875(0,25)-7122(0)-5479(0)]TJ ET /GS3 gs 42.46 121.63 m 419.5 121.63 l S BT 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 128.47 Tm /GS2 gs (INDEPENDENTS)Tj ET /GS3 gs 42.46 104.11 m 419.5 104.11 l S BT 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 110.95 Tm /GS2 gs 0 Tw [($Jonathan Moyo$)-9015(16 878)-5883(0,64)-7122(1)-5479(1)]TJ /F13 1 Tf 0 -1.832 TD [(TOT)89(AL)-11763(2 634 645)-6133(100)-6124(120)-4482(101)]TJ /F9 1 Tf 8 0 0 8 42.46 74.59 Tm [(Sour)14(ce: Zimbabwe Election Commission)]TJ ET 1000 M /GS3 gs 42.74 215.61 376.57 -127.07 re S 10 M 366.82 215.83 m 366.82 88.63 l 302.14 215.83 m 302.14 88.63 l 235.06 215.83 m 235.06 88.63 l 151.3 215.83 m 151.3 88.63 l S endstream endobj 20 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R /F11 6 0 R /F13 21 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 23 0 obj << /Length 5822 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 422.88 642.07 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs 0.001 Tc (127)Tj -36.048 -0.132 TD (V)Tj 7 0 0 7 69.6 640.75 Tm 0 Tc (OLUME)Tj 10 0 0 10 95.64 640.75 Tm 0 Tw ( 4 N)Tj 7 0 0 7 116.52 640.75 Tm (O)Tj 10 0 0 10 122.04 640.75 Tm ( 2)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 62.4 637.99 m 437.88 637.99 l S BT 13 0 0 13 125.4 599.59 Tm /GS2 gs (T)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 133.44 599.59 Tm (HE)Tj 13 0 0 13 146.52 599.59 Tm -0.011 Tw [( 2005 E)]TJ 9.1 0 0 9.1 186.72 599.59 Tm (LECTIONS)Tj 13 0 0 13 232.44 599.59 Tm ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 235.44 599.59 Tm (AS)Tj 13 0 0 13 247.32 599.59 Tm ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 250.44 599.59 Tm (A)Tj 13 0 0 13 257.52 599.59 Tm -0.011 Tc 0 Tw ( L)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 268.56 599.59 Tm 0 Tc (ESSON)Tj 13 0 0 13 298.44 599.59 Tm ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 301.44 599.59 Tm (FOR)Tj 13 0 0 13 319.8 599.59 Tm ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 322.92 599.59 Tm (THE)Tj 13 0 0 13 341.64 599.59 Tm -0.011 Tw [( MDC)]TJ 10.5 0 0 10.5 62.4 579.07 Tm 0.059 Tw [(The 2005 elections served as an important lesson for the MDC in its str)10(uggle for)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.123 Tw [(political power)78(, compelling it to r)19(eassess its strategies and tactics critically and)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.06 Tw [(objectively and to change them in r)21(esponse to the dynamics of the Zimbabwean)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.072 Tw [(national situation. One of the key r)16(easons for its poor performance is that it has)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.011 Tc 0.125 Tw (become a moderate political party with conservative socio-economic policies,)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.05 Tw [(abandoning the dir)21(ect pr)22(ogrammes of action which had played a leading r)16(ole in its)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD [(formation and enabled it to pose a serious challenge to the r)10(uling party in 2000 and)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.085 Tw [(2002. It r)25(eplaced forms of dir)13(ect action such as demonstrations and strikes with)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.073 Tw [(international fund-raising, pr)21(oviding obvious ammunition for the r)6(uling party\325s)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.062 Tw (contention that it is a tool of the imperialist powers, particularly Britain,)Tj 6.1 0 0 6.1 402.84 461.11 Tm (2)Tj 10.5 0 0 10.5 405.84 457.63 Tm [( and of)]TJ -32.709 -1.291 TD -0.027 Tw [(Zimbabwe\325s white farmers. It r)17(eplaced the str)6(uggle against neo-liberalism with its)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.075 Tw [(commitment to privatisation and the cost r)27(ecovery policies articulated by Eddie)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.02 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Cr)24(oss in Mar)14(ch 2000. Pointing out that the MDC in power will not support)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.031 Tw [(government interfer)24(ence in the way in which people manage their lives and that it)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.008 Tc -0.062 Tw (will fast-track privatisation, he maintained that it will privatise all parastatals within)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.105 Tw [(two years, privatise the Central Statistical Of)22(fice and virtually the entir)17(e school)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.051 Tw [(delivery system, and decr)27(ease \324government employment fr)12(om about 300,000 at the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.123 Tw [(pr)25(esent time to about 75,000 in five years\325 $Cr)16(oss, in Bond 2001, p 15; Cr)14(oss in)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw [(Alexander 2000, )9(p 394$.)]TJ 2.16 -1.28 TD -0.005 Tc -0.062 Tw [(These policies wer)18(e articulated and defended when the ruling party attempted)]TJ -2.16 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw [(to incr)23(ease social spending and price contr)19(ols and condemned privatisation.)]TJ 6.1 0 0 6.1 414.72 312.55 Tm (3)Tj 10.5 0 0 10.5 85.08 295.63 Tm 0.05 Tw (The Bulawayo town council, led by the MDC, implemented unpopular cut-)Tj -2.16 -1.291 TD -0.009 Tc -0.062 Tw [(of)27(fs of basic services. Its neo-liberal policies r)7(eflect a fundamental str)20(uctural pr)8(oblem)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.063 Tw [(which made it dif)16(ficult to advance in theory and practice the inter)22(ests of the masses)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.034 Tw [(of the people and to go beyond criticising the violent and r)18(epr)24(essive policies of the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.049 Tw [(r)18(uling party)109(. Even staunch critics of the ruling party acknowledge that the MDC)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.006 Tw [(does not pr)27(ovide viable theor)10(etical and practical options and that, enmeshed as it)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.015 Tw [(is in neo-liberal socio-political and economic policies, it has failed to addr)27(ess itself)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.013 Tw (adequately to the land question, which has a decisive impact on politics in former)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0.075 Tw (settler colonies. It has succeeded in winning the support of peasants, the youth,)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0.074 Tw [(women, intellectuals and other social gr)22(oups and it has made it possible for the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tw [(r)18(uling party to consolidate its position $Ndlovu-Gatsheni 2003, pp 127-8$.)]TJ 2.16 -1.291 TD 0.027 Tc 0.125 Tw (Gwisai $2005, p 8$ maintains that leaders of the International Socialist)Tj -2.16 -1.28 TD -0.004 Tc -0.063 Tw [(Or)30(ganisation told MDC leaders in 2001 that \324unless they immediately changed their)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.079 Tw [(strategy of opposing the land r)24(eform pr)18(ogramme and hanging on the apr)19(ons of)]TJ ET /GS3 gs 62.4 87.55 m 438.84 87.55 l S BT 7 0 0 7 62.4 77.95 Tm /GS2 gs (2)Tj 8 0 0 8 76.44 77.95 Tm -0.025 Tw [(Richar)15(d Dowden of )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 8.85 0 TD (The Independent)Tj /F9 1 Tf 6.735 0 TD [( $United Kingdom$ maintains that British support for the MDC and)]TJ -15.585 -1.245 TD -0.046 Tw [(r)20(egime change and the )21(Anglo-American invasion of Iraq contributed to the success of the r)10(uling party in)]TJ 0 -1.26 TD 0 Tw (the 2005 elections. On this see Gwisai 2005, p 8.)Tj 7 0 0 7 62.4 47.95 Tm (3)Tj 8 0 0 8 76.44 47.95 Tm -0.037 Tw [(Patrick Bond $2002, p 2$ maintains that by )33(August 2001 the MDC\325s Economic Stabilisation and Recovery)]TJ 0 -1.245 TD -0.001 Tw [(Pr)9(ogramme had codified these policies.)]TJ ET endstream endobj 24 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R /F11 6 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 26 0 obj << /Length 5638 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 292.66 642.19 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs (J)Tj 7 0 0 7 295.9 642.19 Tm (OURNAL)Tj 10 0 0 10 327.1 642.19 Tm ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 329.5 642.19 Tm (OF)Tj 10 0 0 10 338.86 642.19 Tm -0.046 Tc 0 Tw ( A)Tj 7 0 0 7 348.7 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (FRICAN)Tj 10 0 0 10 375.82 642.19 Tm -0.009 Tc ( E)Tj 7 0 0 7 384.46 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (LECTIONS)Tj 10 0 0 10 41.02 642.07 Tm 0.001 Tc (128)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 41.62 637.99 m 419.5 637.99 l S BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 42.46 606.07 Tm /GS2 gs 0 Tc -0.019 Tw [(white farmers\325, national \324capitalists, the W)84(est and the International Monetary Fund)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.015 Tw (and instead adopt an anti-neo-liberal anti-imperialist stance they would be buried)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw [(in futur)12(e elections even without violence\325.)]TJ 2.171 -1.28 TD 0.053 Tw [(The MDC has failed to embark on the sustained pr)27(ogrammes of mass action)]TJ -2.171 -1.291 TD 0.094 Tw [(which ar)17(e essential for the cr)19(eation and consolidation of the socio-political, legal)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.089 Tw [(and economic conditions conducive to fr)11(ee and fair elections and which ar)17(e also)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.034 Tw [(demanded by civil society or)12(ganisations. These pr)20(ogrammes would help to compel)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.014 Tc 0.125 Tw (the ruling party to accede to the scrapping of the constitutional clause which)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.097 Tw [(guarantees the pr)13(esident 30 seats befor)23(e the elections, to the establishment of an)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.053 Tw [(independent body which r)18(egulates the media, and to the abolition of laws giving)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw (police the power to authorise meetings.)Tj 2.171 -1.28 TD -0.058 Tw [(Lovemor)24(e Madhuku, leader of the National Constitutional )37(Assembly $NCA$, a)]TJ -2.171 -1.291 TD 0.09 Tw [(coalition of civil society or)13(ganisations fighting for constitutional r)13(eform, believes)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.013 Tc -0.062 Tw [(that neither the MDC nor civil society or)13(ganisations has struggled \324enough\325 for change)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.012 Tw [(and that ther)17(e has not been a \324united popular mass pr)18(essur)16(e\325 upon the r)8(uling party)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tw [(to r)8(espond af)28(firmatively to their demands $Madhuku, in T)85(abane )7(2005, p 1)45(1$.)]TJ 2.171 -1.291 TD -0.042 Tw [(Responding to the question of whether)79(, after the defeat of the opposition party)]TJ -2.171 -1.28 TD 0.033 Tw [(in the 2005 elections, the people will still look to it to \324deliver them fr)14(om Mugabe\325)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.031 Tw [(Madhuku concludes that this will depend on the MDC\325s pr)10(ogramme of action. \324If it)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.037 Tw [(is still obsessed by minute details such as r)12(esults being tabulated late or figur)19(es that)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.005 Tc -0.062 Tw [(it does not like, people will lose inter)15(est in the MDC,\325 he says, adding that \324T)84(svangirai)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.002 Tw [(must do less talking and start focusing on the bigger pictur)12(e\325 and the party should)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.111 Tw [(no longer try to \324cr)11(eate the impr)17(ession\325 that Zanu-PF has no support $Madhuku)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.001 Tw [(2005, p 1)47(1$.)]TJ 2.171 -1.291 TD 0.112 Tw [(The MDC must embark upon pr)22(ogrammes of demonstrations, pr)15(otests and)]TJ -2.171 -1.28 TD 0.039 Tw [(strikes against the violent and r)17(epr)12(essive policies of the state and the r)7(uling party)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.027 Tw [(and the socio-economic pr)14(oblems af)12(fecting the masses of Zimbabwe. It must have)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.085 Tw [(viable strategies and tactics for confr)16(onting the r)10(uling party and sustaining itself)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.004 Tc -0.062 Tw [(and pr)9(ogrammes of action under its leadership. It must adopt and implement means)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw [(which will enable it to survive the r)9(uling party\325s onslaughts and r)10(etaliation.)]TJ 2.171 -1.291 TD 0.081 Tw [(It must have a viable pr)21(ogramme of action which will inspir)20(e the masses of)]TJ -2.171 -1.28 TD 0.091 Tw [(Zimbabwe. It must pr)19(omote and advance popular national demands such as job)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.048 Tw [(security)101(, social welfar)26(e, and land r)16(eform. Its economic policies do not constitute a)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.01 Tc -0.063 Tw [(qualitative move towar)15(ds solving Zimbabwe\325s socio-economic pr)13(oblems, rather)]TJ 6.1 0 0 6.1 399.1 164.11 Tm (4)Tj 10.5 0 0 10.5 402.1 160.63 Tm [( they)]TJ -34.251 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.021 Tw [(ar)15(e bound to intensify these pr)16(oblems.)]TJ 6.1 0 0 6.1 219.22 150.55 Tm (5)Tj 10.5 0 0 10.5 222.22 147.07 Tm [( It has adopted the same neo-liberal policies)]TJ -17.12 -1.28 TD 0.001 Tw [(that have \324br)11(ought the Zimbabwean economy to its knees and devastated the lives)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.062 Tw [(of the masses\325. It opposes \324the land invasions\325 and stands instead for an \324or)14(derly\325)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.076 Tw [(r)18(esolution of the land question although it has \324not spelled out what exactly that)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.125 Tw [(means\325. It will be \324incapable of solving any of the fundamental pr)8(oblems of the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.001 Tc -0.062 Tw [(masses\325 on \324the basis\325 of its economic policies and pr)14(ogrammes $Hamilton 2000, p 2$.)]TJ ET /GS3 gs 42.46 57.55 m 419.5 57.55 l S BT 7 0 0 7 42.46 47.95 Tm /GS2 gs (4)Tj 8 0 0 8 56.62 47.95 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw (For the MDC\325s economic policies see Movement for Democratic Change 2004.)Tj 7 0 0 7 42.46 37.99 Tm (5)Tj 8 0 0 8 56.62 37.99 Tm [(For an analysis of the MDC\325s economic policies see, among others, Danser)15(eau 2005, pp 22-24.)]TJ ET endstream endobj 27 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 29 0 obj << /Length 5413 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 422.88 642.07 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs 0.001 Tc (129)Tj -36.048 -0.132 TD (V)Tj 7 0 0 7 69.6 640.75 Tm 0 Tc (OLUME)Tj 10 0 0 10 95.64 640.75 Tm 0 Tw ( 4 N)Tj 7 0 0 7 116.52 640.75 Tm (O)Tj 10 0 0 10 122.04 640.75 Tm ( 2)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 62.4 637.99 m 437.88 637.99 l S BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 85.08 606.07 Tm /GS2 gs 0.011 Tc 0.125 Tw [(The MDC\325s close working r)18(elationships with conservative and moderate)]TJ -2.16 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.063 Tw [(political parties and civil society or)20(ganisations which support it politically)110(, morally)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.028 Tc 0.125 Tw [(and financially have pr)21(evented it fr)20(om for)14(ging working r)20(elationships with)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.007 Tc -0.062 Tw [(pr)23(ogr)14(essive political parties and civil society or)23(ganisations thr)14(oughout the Southern)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.034 Tc 0.125 Tw [(African r)24(egion, the )30(African continent and beyond and fr)20(om adopting and)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.031 Tc 0.124 Tw [(implementing viable or pr)28(ogr)12(essive strategies and tactics as well as dir)20(ect)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.085 Tw [(pr)25(ogrammes of mass action. Its socio-economic policies, its views of democracy)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.121 Tw [(and political good governance and its political platform ar)29(e not fundamentally)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.113 Tw [(dif)23(fer)18(ent fr)21(om those of the International Monetary Fund and the W)92(orld Bank \320)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.02 Tc 0.125 Tw [(multilateral or)27(ganisations whose primary task is to advance the inter)11(ests of)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw [(neocolonialism and imperialism $Danser)21(eau 2005, p 24$.)]TJ 2.16 -1.28 TD -0.005 Tw [(The MDC lacks viable pr)23(ogr)11(essive strategies and tactics and a pr)24(ogramme of)]TJ -2.16 -1.291 TD -0.041 Tw [(action that pr)21(omotes and advances popular national demands and dif)22(fers on these)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.044 Tw [(issues with its allies, the Zimbabwe Congr)26(ess of T)87(rade Unions and the NCA. T)89(rade)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.062 Tw [(unionists wer)22(e allocated about a dozen of the 57 parliamentary seats the MDC won)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.028 Tw [(in 2000 $most of which went to academics and civil society activists$ and many ar)31(e)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.005 Tc -0.062 Tw [(demanding mor)26(e militancy and mor)14(e r)18(epr)21(esentation within the MDC. T)84(rade unions)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.013 Tc 0.125 Tw (have criticised the MDC for concentrating on court actions and international)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.035 Tw (sanctions, issues they maintain do not benefit the masses, particularly the workers)Tj 0 -1.28 TD ($)Tj /F11 1 Tf 0.331 0 TD 0 Tw (Africa Confidential)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.76 0 TD ( 2004a, pp 2-3$.)Tj -5.931 -1.291 TD -0.026 Tw [(Pointing out that the \324sharpest weapon in the str)6(uggle\325 against what he r)24(efers)]TJ -2.16 -1.28 TD 0.032 Tw [(to as \324the outpost of tyranny\325 is \324internal opposition\325, T)59(im Hughes maintains that)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.028 Tc 0.125 Tw (\324despite its political dominance in the cities and overwhelming support in)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.061 Tw [(Matebeleland\325, the MDC \324shows no signs of ef)23(fectively challenging the Mugabe)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.007 Tw [(r)29(egime at any level\325 and that it \324has failed to maximise its comparative advantage)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.109 Tw (and mobilise unions, workers and the urban youth in a concerted campaign of)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw [(r)29(olling mass action\325 $Hughes 2005, p 2$.)]TJ 2.16 -1.28 TD 0.041 Tw [(Party militants maintain that the MDC must intensify the str)8(uggle by going)]TJ -2.16 -1.291 TD -0.04 Tw (beyond \324parliamentary opposition tactics and legal challenges to the election\325; that)Tj 0 -1.28 TD -0.051 Tw [(r)18(uling party militants went to jail and wer)16(e killed in the struggle and that the MDC)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.05 Tw [(should demonstrate to the r)15(uling party that its members will \324do the same for a)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tw (second liberation\325 $)Tj /F11 1 Tf 8.446 0 TD (Africa Confidential)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.771 0 TD ( 2002, p 2$.)Tj -14.057 -1.291 TD 0.036 Tw [(Thus far the MDC has failed to transform itself so as to challenge the r)15(uling)]TJ -2.16 -1.28 TD 0.084 Tw [(party decisively)115(. Political activists and writers such as Brian Kagor)19(o, the former)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.053 Tw [(coor)22(dinator of the Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition, have been calling upon it since)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.062 Tw [(the 2002 pr)17(esidential election to adapt in or)26(der to meet the challenges of Zimbabwe)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.03 Tw [(after that election. Kagor)24(o maintains that the pr)13(esidential election and the events)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.011 Tc -0.062 Tw [(befor)24(e and subsequent to it have pr)24(esented the opposition party with new challenges)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.012 Tw [(and sever)22(e tests. The first challenge is the issue of cohesion. The MDC, formed as)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.023 Tw [(an or)21(ganisation consisting of social for)25(ces with differ)30(ent and antagonistic inter)13(ests)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.068 Tw [(united by the need to defeat Mugabe thr)18(ough an electoral pr)18(ocess, has not been)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.029 Tw (able to adopt and implement the \324inspirational and strategic\325 positions essential to)Tj 0 -1.291 TD -0.007 Tc -0.062 Tw [(an ef)24(fective opposition party striving for political power)67(. While some of its members)]TJ ET endstream endobj 30 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R /F11 6 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 32 0 obj << /Length 5369 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 292.66 642.19 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs (J)Tj 7 0 0 7 295.9 642.19 Tm (OURNAL)Tj 10 0 0 10 327.1 642.19 Tm ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 329.5 642.19 Tm (OF)Tj 10 0 0 10 338.86 642.19 Tm -0.046 Tc 0 Tw ( A)Tj 7 0 0 7 348.7 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (FRICAN)Tj 10 0 0 10 375.82 642.19 Tm -0.009 Tc ( E)Tj 7 0 0 7 384.46 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (LECTIONS)Tj 10 0 0 10 41.02 642.07 Tm 0.001 Tc (130)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 41.62 637.99 m 419.5 637.99 l S BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 42.46 606.07 Tm /GS2 gs 0 Tc 0.047 Tw (have called for mass uprising, others advocate the continued use of negotiations)Tj 0 -1.28 TD -0.009 Tc -0.063 Tw [(and international intervention and it is the latter who have won the day)111(. The position)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.055 Tw (of the leadership on key issues is not only contradictory but also antagonistic or)Tj 0 -1.28 TD [(irr)18(econcilable.)]TJ 2.171 -1.291 TD 0.018 Tw (The issue of leadership is one of the key challenges for the MDC. Most of its)Tj -2.171 -1.28 TD -0.011 Tw [(leaders occupy their positions because of the ur)19(gent need to defeat Mugabe in the)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.01 Tc -0.063 Tw [(elections. The negative consequence of this factor is that their democratic cr)14(edentials,)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.025 Tc 0.125 Tw [(integrity and capacity have never been interr)14(ogated. They do not meet the)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.007 Tc -0.063 Tw [(r)11(equir)19(ements of the post-pr)17(esidential 2002 election period, which ar)18(e \324gr)20(eater clarity)107(,)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.082 Tw (immense integrity and commitment to the ideals of building a truly democratic)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw [(Zimbabwe\325 $Kagor)13(o 2003, p 24$.)]TJ 2.171 -1.28 TD -0.006 Tc -0.062 Tw [(The MDC\325s lack of shr)17(ewd leadership is evident in its r)20(elations with the masses)]TJ -2.171 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.046 Tw [(of the people, a challenge r)14(eferr)24(ed to by Kagor)9(o as a lack of \324str)13(eet cr)19(edibility\325. It)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.017 Tw [(was expected that if Mugabe \324stole\325 the elections ther)12(e would be a mass uprising.)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.117 Tw (The party\325s \324leaders seem to have expected the masses to initiate this uprising,)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0.007 Tw [(wher)16(eas the masses looked to\325 its leadership to initiate and lead it. Related to this)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.036 Tw [(issue is the fact that the MDC \324has also not been as ef)11(fective in demonstrating its)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tw [(continuing r)20(elevance to the people\325s str)13(ongly felt needs in the pr)13(esent situation\325.)]TJ 2.171 -1.291 TD 0.01 Tc 0.125 Tw [(The party has failed to r)20(espond adequately to the r)18(uling party\325s view of)]TJ -2.171 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.1 Tw [(Zimbabwe\325s pr)8(oblems as a pan-African str)15(uggle against imperialist domination)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.015 Tw [(and exploitation. It has so far not r)8(ecognised the fundamental need to \324r)20(ethink its)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.01 Tc -0.063 Tw [(r)8(egional strategy\325, which has not been successful and to articulate clearly \324its position)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.028 Tc 0.125 Tw [(on the contentious issues of race r)12(elations, North-South r)14(elations, r)20(esour)25(ce)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.051 Tw [(r)18(edistribution and the br)11(oader pan-African agenda\325. Kagor)19(o $2003, p 24$ concludes)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.042 Tw [(that the MDC \324has missed many good opportunities to r)15(egain the upper hand in)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tw (the political contest in Zimbabwe\325.)Tj 2.171 -1.291 TD 0.039 Tc 0.125 Tw [(The theor)18(etical and practical weaknesses of the MDC have led some)]TJ -2.171 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw [(or)15(ganisations and individuals to conclude that even if Zimbabwe wer)14(e to comply)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.012 Tc -0.062 Tw (fully with all the Principles and Guidelines Governing Democratic Elections adopted)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.027 Tw [(by the Southern )28(African Development Community $SADC$ Summit in Mauritius)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.015 Tw [(in )34(August 2004 $Zimbabwe Election Support Network 2005, pp 301-31$, the r)8(uling)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.046 Tw (party would win the 2005 elections. The MDC\325s absence of vision and strategy and)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0.064 Tw [(its lack of capacity to lead Zimbabwe\325s r)6(econstr)19(uction and development pr)12(ocess)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.014 Tw [(have led many)100(, among them South )49(Africa\325s )26(African National Congr)27(ess, to believe)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.051 Tw [(that the r)15(esolution to the country\325s pr)14(oblems lies within the r)14(uling party)99(, not the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tw (MDC $Dawes 2005, p 10$.)Tj 2.171 -1.291 TD -0.006 Tc -0.062 Tw [(This position is captur)22(ed in Godfr)20(ey Kanyenze\325s contention that people should)]TJ -2.171 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.042 Tw [(focus on Mugabe and the ruling party)113(, not T)89(svangirai and the MDC and that the)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.021 Tw [(\324gr)18(eatest thr)17(eat to Zanu-PF right now is Zanu-PF itself, not the MDC\325 $Kanyenze,)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tw (in Rukuni 2005, p 2$.)Tj 2.171 -1.291 TD 0.008 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Critics of the r)11(uling party)117(, including some MDC members, maintain that)]TJ -2.171 -1.28 TD 0.007 Tc [(Mor)10(gan T)100(svangirai does not have the intellectual capacity to lead an ef)10(fective)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.043 Tw [(opposition party)105(, particularly one that is challenging a hegemonic party which has)]TJ ET endstream endobj 33 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 35 0 obj << /Length 5576 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 422.88 642.07 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs 0.001 Tc (131)Tj -36.048 -0.132 TD (V)Tj 7 0 0 7 69.6 640.75 Tm 0 Tc (OLUME)Tj 10 0 0 10 95.64 640.75 Tm 0 Tw ( 4 N)Tj 7 0 0 7 116.52 640.75 Tm (O)Tj 10 0 0 10 122.04 640.75 Tm ( 2)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 62.4 637.99 m 437.88 637.99 l S BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 59.52 606.07 Tm /GS2 gs 0.008 Tc 0.125 Tw [(been in power since 1980 and whose leaders have pr)17(ovided it with enormous)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.076 Tw [(intellectual capacity and r)20(esour)12(ces in its quest for the continued exer)14(cise of state)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.004 Tw [(power)66(. T)88(svangirai, they aver)82(, is not a shr)22(ewd leader)64(. He lacks \324a degr)23(ee of political)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.005 Tc -0.063 Tw [(imagination and r)10(uthlessness\325 $)]TJ /F11 1 Tf 13.486 0 TD (Africa Confidential)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.611 0 TD [( 2001, p 4$. In 2000 T)101(svangirai made)]TJ -21.097 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.106 Tw [(a crucial political mistake when he allowed international media to r)17(ecor)24(d white)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.006 Tw (farmers, many of them soldiers in the Rhodesian army that had fought against the)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0.054 Tw [(for)17(ces of national liberation, handing cheques to him. The film made him appear)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.008 Tw (either to be hungry for money or \324na\225ve\325. Mugabe\325s advisors used the incident in a)Tj 0 -1.291 TD -0.001 Tw [(pr)13(opaganda war that pr)26(esented the MDC as the servant of the white minority and)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.063 Tw (of Britain $)Tj /F11 1 Tf 4.583 0 TD (Africa Confidential)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.703 0 TD [( 2003, pp 4-5$. T)89(svangirai\325s association with the farmers)]TJ -12.286 -1.291 TD -0.006 Tc [(isolated him fr)13(om pr)21(ogr)15(essive people nationally and internationally $Kanhema 2003,)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.001 Tw (p 5$.)Tj 2.16 -1.291 TD 0.003 Tc 0.125 Tw (Jonathan Moyo, who some people thought might joint the MDC upon his)Tj -2.16 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.009 Tw [(expulsion fr)11(om the Cabinet and the r)10(uling party)120(, declar)11(ed that he would not join it)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw [(because it was \324immatur)11(e and ideologically shallow\325 $Moyo, in Rukani 2005, p 1$.)]TJ 2.16 -1.28 TD 0.114 Tw [(T)87(r)18(evor Ncube, the Zimbabwean chief executive of)20(ficer and owner of South)]TJ -2.16 -1.291 TD -0.012 Tc -0.062 Tw [(Africa\325s M&G Media Ltd, wr)8(ote immediately befor)25(e the 2005 elections that T)88(svangirai)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.027 Tc 0.125 Tw (was no match for Mugabe and that the MDC was divided, \324paralysed\325 and)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.061 Tw [(\324inef)20(fective\325, lacking vision and strategy)106(. Ther)16(e was, he wr)18(ote, a popular position \324in)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.084 Tw (and outside the party\325 that it had \324long lost the passion and drive for a people\325s)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0.112 Tw [(r)18(evolution\325. He also maintained that Zimbabwe \324faces an acute leadership crisis)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.027 Tw [(that only Mugabe has the capacity to r)11(esolve, if he so decides\325 and that if the r)16(uling)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.019 Tw (party won the elections Mugabe could \324undo some of the damage he has inflicted)Tj 0 -1.28 TD -0.022 Tw (on Zimbabwe and lay the foundation for a stable political dispensation that would)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw [(deliver economic development and gr)12(owth\325 $Ncube 2005, p 29$.)]TJ 2.16 -1.28 TD -0.004 Tc -0.062 Tw (Pointing out that the possibility of an MDC victory in the 2005 elections \324cannot)Tj -2.16 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.02 Tw [(be totally discounted\325 or \324completely r)9(uled out\325, pr)15(ovided the MDC mobilised the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.019 Tw [(people\325s anger against the ruling party to deliver its victory)105(, Ncube concluded that)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.104 Tw [(an MDC victory would be \324a frightening pr)18(ospect for Zimbabwe\325, which would)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.047 Tw [(find itself faced with the pr)12(ospect of \324a hugely divided and inexperienced gr)23(oup\325)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.017 Tw [(trying to solve pr)13(oblems of \324mor)16(e than two decades of misr)11(ule\325 $Ncube 2005, p 29$.)]TJ 2.16 -1.28 TD 0.005 Tc 0.125 Tw (Newton Kanhema, a Zimbabwean journalist, maintains a similar position,)Tj -2.16 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.036 Tw [(contending that T)90(svangirai and his advisers do not constitute leadership material)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.06 Tw [(for Zimbabwe. T)88(svangirai\325s position on the land question is not clear and he has not)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.021 Tc 0.125 Tw [(articulated a feasible plan for solving the country\325s economic pr)15(oblems. His)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.05 Tw [(contribution to the debate about how best to solve Zimbabwe\325s economic pr)13(oblems)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.017 Tw [(has been his position that the economic situation will impr)18(ove once Mugabe is no)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.012 Tc -0.063 Tw [(longer in power)73(. Instead of building alliances or working r)18(elationships with Southern)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.045 Tw (African leaders he has \324elected to insult them and, at the same time, court favour)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0.011 Tw [(with W)94(estern leaders\325. This, says Kanhema $2003, p 5$, is not the best way to \324win)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.009 Tc -0.063 Tw [(friends and influence people, let alone get support\325 in the struggle for political power)74(.)]TJ 2.16 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.074 Tw [(If it is to be taken seriously the MDC must change its r)14(egional strategy and)]TJ -2.16 -1.291 TD -0.002 Tc -0.062 Tw [(articulate its position on key issues such as the race question, North-South r)15(elations,)]TJ ET endstream endobj 36 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R /F11 6 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 38 0 obj << /Length 5711 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 292.66 642.19 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs (J)Tj 7 0 0 7 295.9 642.19 Tm (OURNAL)Tj 10 0 0 10 327.1 642.19 Tm ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 329.5 642.19 Tm (OF)Tj 10 0 0 10 338.86 642.19 Tm -0.046 Tc 0 Tw ( A)Tj 7 0 0 7 348.7 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (FRICAN)Tj 10 0 0 10 375.82 642.19 Tm -0.009 Tc ( E)Tj 7 0 0 7 384.46 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (LECTIONS)Tj 10 0 0 10 41.02 642.07 Tm 0.001 Tc (132)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 41.62 637.99 m 419.5 637.99 l S BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 42.46 606.07 Tm /GS2 gs 0.035 Tc 0.125 Tw [(r)7(edistribution of r)22(esour)17(ces such as land and the pan-African agenda. The)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.037 Tw [(International Crisis Gr)15(oup supported this r)15(eality in its r)14(eport on Zimbabwe after)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.01 Tw [(the 2005 elections and in its r)16(ecommendations of what should be done by internal)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.079 Tw [(and external inter)16(ested parties to r)13(esolve its pr)16(oblems. It r)22(ecommended that the)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.029 Tw [(MDC develop a clear position on the best and most ef)11(fective way to exert pr)17(essur)28(e)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.04 Tw [(on the government, r)18(evitalise tactical and strategic alliances and working r)8(elations)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.077 Tw [(with civil society and other social for)11(ces, r)21(enew its leadership and str)6(uctur)17(es by)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.11 Tw [(holding elections, develop viable alternative pr)18(ogrammes for the socio-political)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.011 Tc 0.125 Tw [(and economic issues af)12(fecting the people of the country and r)22(ebuild external)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.102 Tw [(r)18(elations, especially with Southern )27(African governments and the )39(African Union)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw [($International Crisis Gr)10(oup 2005, p 3$.)]TJ 2.171 -1.28 TD 0.067 Tw [(Blade Nzimande, General Secr)23(etary of the South )31(African Communist Party)123(,)]TJ -2.171 -1.291 TD -0.055 Tw [(maintains $2003, p 7$ that the \324mission\325 of \324the conservative for)17(ces\325 who support the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.034 Tw [(MDC is to \324r)9(oll back the national liberation movement, and might be positioning)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.082 Tw [(themselves to implement the W)82(orld Bank pr)26(ogramme better than Zanu-PF\325 and)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.009 Tw [(that this is \324partly illustrated by the fact that the MDC has no clear pr)8(ogramme on)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.052 Tw [(the key issues facing the Zimbabwean r)8(evolution\325. )41(Academic Patrick Bond $2001, p)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.057 Tw [(46$ maintains that the MDC shifted rapidly and dramatically to the right befor)17(e the)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.011 Tc -0.063 Tw [(June 2000 parliamentary elections by endorsing neo-liberal policies in or)10(der to attract)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.102 Tw [(about US$2-million in campaign funds fr)14(om white businesses and conservative)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.087 Tw [(international allies and that Zimbabwe\325s post-1997 crisis is a dir)21(ect result of the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.007 Tc -0.062 Tw (context of the early 1990s in which the government\325s power and Mugabe\325s decisions)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.056 Tw [(wer)17(e r)14(epeatedly limited, conditioned and ultimately r)16(eversed by the USA)57( $Bond)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.063 Tw [(2001, p 73$. If these positions ar)15(e corr)12(ect, they raise the fundamental question of)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.013 Tw [(why the pr)12(ogr)23(essive for)15(ces of )31(Africa and the r)21(est of the world should support the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.015 Tc 0.125 Tw [(MDC in its quest for political power)63(. T)94(o)0( the extent that these for)21(ces support)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.066 Tw [(imperialism it raises the question of whether the r)8(uling party\325s position that the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.011 Tw [(MDC is a fr)11(ont for the inter)22(ests of national and external \324white businesses\325 and of)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.022 Tw [(imperialism has a validity and enjoys support among pr)14(ogr)11(essive for)27(ces of )31(Africa.)]TJ 13 0 0 13 88.54 195.07 Tm (T)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 96.46 195.07 Tm (HE)Tj 13 0 0 13 109.66 195.07 Tm 0 Tw ( MDC \324S T)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 169.3 195.07 Tm [(HREA)67(T)]TJ 13 0 0 13 200.5 195.07 Tm ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 203.74 195.07 Tm -0.019 Tc (TO)Tj 13 0 0 13 216.34 195.07 Tm 0 Tc ( B)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 227.5 195.07 Tm (OYCOTT)Tj 13 0 0 13 265.54 195.07 Tm ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 268.78 195.07 Tm (THE)Tj 13 0 0 13 287.5 195.07 Tm ( 2005 E)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 327.94 195.07 Tm (LECTIONS)Tj 10.5 0 0 10.5 42.46 174.55 Tm 0.101 Tw [(In )36(August 2004 the MDC decided it would not participate in the 2005 elections)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.048 Tw [(until the electoral playing field had been levelled. Its Secr)11(etary General, W)96(elshman)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.052 Tw (Ncube, told )Tj /F11 1 Tf 5.337 0 TD (Africa Confidential)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.714 0 TD [( $2004a, p 2$ that ther)20(e was \324no sense in legitimising a)]TJ -13.051 -1.28 TD 0.039 Tw [(pr)13(ocess whose r)17(esult is alr)19(eady pr)25(edetermined\325 and that the MDC would expose)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.032 Tw [(electoral fraud and pursue court actions to corr)16(ect it. He said that the decision was)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.06 Tw (taken unanimously by the party\325s national executive committee, which was \324not)Tj 0 -1.291 TD -0.038 Tw [(pr)13(epar)21(ed to dignify a flawed electoral pr)15(ocess\325. Pointing out that the \324fundamental)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.015 Tc 0.125 Tw [(principle is whether the people of Zimbabwe have their fr)7(eedom or not\325, he)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.003 Tw (concluded that if \324they [Zanu-PF] want to have the 150 seats, they can have them\325)Tj 0 -1.28 TD -0.059 Tw (and they \324will definitely know the people of Zimbabwe did not elect them\325 $Ncube,)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw (in Gandu 2004, p 17$.)Tj ET endstream endobj 39 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R /F11 6 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 41 0 obj << /Length 5572 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 422.88 642.07 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs 0.001 Tc (133)Tj -36.048 -0.132 TD (V)Tj 7 0 0 7 69.6 640.75 Tm 0 Tc (OLUME)Tj 10 0 0 10 95.64 640.75 Tm 0 Tw ( 4 N)Tj 7 0 0 7 116.52 640.75 Tm (O)Tj 10 0 0 10 122.04 640.75 Tm ( 2)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 62.4 637.99 m 437.88 637.99 l S BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 87.36 606.07 Tm /GS2 gs 0.01 Tc 0.125 Tw [(It was dif)19(ficult to see how the MDC could survive as a serious, leading)]TJ -2.16 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.049 Tw (opposition party if it boycotted the elections. In fact, it would seem that the key)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0.053 Tw [(r)18(eason for the party to contemplate a boycott is that it was r)22(eluctant to or)15(ganise)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.101 Tw [(mass action outside of its urban str)26(ongholds and to compel the government to)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.003 Tc -0.063 Tw [(r)26(eform the electoral r)8(ules and appoint an independent electoral commission $)]TJ /F11 1 Tf 33.189 0 TD (Africa)Tj -33.189 -1.28 TD 0 Tc (Confidential)Tj /F9 1 Tf 4.994 0 TD 0 Tw ( 2004a, p 2$.)Tj -2.834 -1.291 TD -0.001 Tc -0.062 Tw [(Another r)13(eason was an attempt to exert pr)25(essur)24(e on the ruling party to accede)]TJ -2.16 -1.28 TD -0.009 Tc -0.063 Tw (to the MDC\325s demands that it postpone the 2005 elections and adopt and implement)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0.013 Tc 0.125 Tw [(electoral r)17(eforms. It was also intended to pr)17(essurise SADC leaders to coer)29(ce)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.061 Tw [(Pr)16(esident Mugabe to adopt and implement electoral r)20(eforms, a fact acknowledged)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.002 Tc 0.125 Tw [(by T)93(svangirai when he maintained that: \324W)96(e have suspended [participation in)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.011 Tc -0.063 Tw [(elections] to give SADC leaders time to r)23(ectify pr)14(oblems so we may have a legitimate)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.06 Tw [(outcome\325 $T)86(svangirai, in Katzenellenbogen and Muleya 2004, p 1$. It was clear that)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tw [(any boycott would be temporary as, indeed, it pr)25(oved to be.)]TJ 13 0 0 13 75.96 397.63 Tm (D)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 86.04 397.63 Tm (IVISION)Tj 13 0 0 13 121.2 397.63 Tm ( O)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 134.76 397.63 Tm (VER)Tj 13 0 0 13 153 397.63 Tm ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 156.24 397.63 Tm (THE)Tj 13 0 0 13 174.84 397.63 Tm ( MDC\325)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 213.36 397.63 Tm (S)Tj 13 0 0 13 218.04 397.63 Tm ( P)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 229.2 397.63 Tm [(AR)35(TICIP)94(A)79(TION)]TJ 13 0 0 13 294.6 397.63 Tm ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 297.84 397.63 Tm (IN)Tj 13 0 0 13 308.52 397.63 Tm ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 311.76 397.63 Tm (THE)Tj 13 0 0 13 330.48 397.63 Tm ( S)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 340.56 397.63 Tm [(ENA)84(TE)]TJ 13 0 0 13 371.16 397.63 Tm ( E)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 382.44 397.63 Tm (LECTIONS)Tj -20.756 -1.49 TD (OF)Tj 13 0 0 13 205.8 384.07 Tm ( 26 N)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 236.04 384.07 Tm (OVEMBER)Tj 13 0 0 13 281.16 384.07 Tm ( 2005)Tj 10.5 0 0 10.5 64.68 363.55 Tm 0.026 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Elections for the r)21(e-established Senate, cr)19(eated in terms of a constitutional)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.117 Tw [(amendment enacted on 30 )43(August 2005, wer)15(e held on 26 November 2005. The)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.039 Tw (upper house has 50 senators elected by ballot to five-year terms. In addition, six)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tw [(members and ten chiefs ar)23(e appointed by the pr)11(esident.)]TJ 2.16 -1.291 TD 0.057 Tw (The divisions within the MDC over its participation in the Senate elections)Tj -2.16 -1.28 TD [(highlighted its theor)25(etical and practical weaknesses. Its failur)14(e to make an early)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.125 Tw (announcement about its participation demonstrated its lack of a clear political)Tj 0 -1.28 TD -0.015 Tw (strategy and tactics. It was evident that the delay in taking a decision on the issue)Tj 0 -1.291 TD -0.011 Tw (would cost it a number of seats should it decide to participate and it had failed to)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0.017 Tw [(learn fr)20(om past experience \320 it had lost a number of seats during the Mar)25(ch 2005)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.108 Tw (parliamentary elections because of its late announcement that it would contest)Tj 0 -1.28 TD (them.)Tj 2.16 -1.291 TD 0.048 Tw (The very fact that the party had participated in the parliamentary elections)Tj -2.16 -1.28 TD -0.009 Tc -0.063 Tw [(made nonsense of T)93(svangirai\325s opposition to the party\325s National Council\325s decision)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.071 Tw [(to take part in the Senate elections. In a secr)18(et ballot of the National Council 33)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tw (members voted in favour of participation, and 31 against.)Tj 2.16 -1.291 TD 0.105 Tw (Less than 15 per cent of the electorate voted in the Senate election. Public)Tj -2.16 -1.28 TD 0.106 Tw (confusion about the purpose of the upper house of Parliament, the inability of)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0.013 Tw [(many people to r)21(each the polling stations because of the national petr)20(ol shortage)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.009 Tw [(and the dif)19(fer)18(ences within the MDC over participation in the election ar)15(e some of)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.007 Tw [(the factors r)19(esponsible for the low turnout. Of the 50 pr)19(ovincial constituencies 31)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.006 Tc -0.063 Tw [(wer)21(e contested and 19 r)9(uling party candidates wer)12(e not opposed. Only 26 members)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.044 Tw [(of the MDC r)17(egister)24(ed their candidacy)114(. The r)11(esults gave the r)8(uling party contr)24(ol of)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.002 Tc -0.063 Tw (43 of the 50 elected seats, with The MDC winning 7. Given the fact that 16 members)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw [(of the Senate ar)25(e appointed by the pr)11(esident, the r)10(uling party has 59 senators.)]TJ ET endstream endobj 42 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R /F11 6 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 46 0 obj << /Length 5222 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 292.66 642.19 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs (J)Tj 7 0 0 7 295.9 642.19 Tm (OURNAL)Tj 10 0 0 10 327.1 642.19 Tm ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 329.5 642.19 Tm (OF)Tj 10 0 0 10 338.86 642.19 Tm -0.046 Tc 0 Tw ( A)Tj 7 0 0 7 348.7 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (FRICAN)Tj 10 0 0 10 375.82 642.19 Tm -0.009 Tc ( E)Tj 7 0 0 7 384.46 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (LECTIONS)Tj 10 0 0 10 41.02 642.07 Tm 0.001 Tc (134)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 41.62 637.99 m 419.5 637.99 l S 0 0 0 0.15 k 42.5 395.7 377.05 -16.15 re f* 0 0 0 0.15 K 1000 M 42.74 580.86 376.57 -23.37 re B* BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 42.46 322.15 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs 0 Tc -0.044 Tw (A key consequence of the divisiveness within the MDC over its participation is the)Tj 0 -1.291 TD -0.008 Tc -0.063 Tw [(possibility that party may split \320 an event which will seriously damage the pr)15(ospects)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw [(of the opposition and further entr)14(ench the ruling party\325s hegemony)121(.)]TJ 13 0 0 13 118.66 262.15 Tm (T)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 126.58 262.15 Tm (HE)Tj 13 0 0 13 139.66 262.15 Tm ( MDC\325)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 178.18 262.15 Tm (S)Tj 13 0 0 13 182.86 262.15 Tm ( \324M)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 202.06 262.15 Tm (UGABE)Tj 13 0 0 13 234.34 262.15 Tm ( M)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 249.82 262.15 Tm (UST)Tj 13 0 0 13 267.22 262.15 Tm ( G)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 280.42 262.15 Tm (O)Tj 13 0 0 13 287.62 262.15 Tm (\325 S)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 301.3 262.15 Tm [(TRA)81(TEGY)]TJ 10.5 0 0 10.5 42.46 241.63 Tm 0.002 Tw [(The developed countries, which ar)10(e r)18(esponsible for the MDC\325s \324Mugabe must go\325)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.05 Tw [(strategy)111(, r)19(egar)10(ded the r)14(esolution of the land question as the means by which the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.022 Tw [(r)6(uling party and its leader won elections and consolidated power)68(. Experts on the)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.043 Tw (Zimbabwean socio-historical situation contest this position $Moyo, in Chirambo &)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0.072 Tw (McCullum 2000; Thompson 2000; Thompson 2003$. The MDC criticises the land)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0.004 Tw [(policy on the gr)19(ounds that it is not popular with the masses of the )34(African people)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.062 Tw [(of Zimbabwe. The r)9(eality is that the state\325s land r)20(eform policy is mor)23(e popular with)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.011 Tw (older Zimbabweans than the MDC\325s accusations of government mismanagement)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0.039 Tw [(and corruption and the pr)18(omise of new land may win mor)24(e votes than criticism.)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.01 Tw [(While Zimbabweans born after the achievement of political independence ar)17(e not)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.002 Tw [(as inter)11(ested in land, the r)19(eality is that it is mor)22(e dif)20(ficult to mobilise them behind)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw (the MDC $)Tj /F11 1 Tf 4.651 0 TD (Africa Confidential)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.771 0 TD ( 2004a, p 3$.)Tj -10.251 -1.28 TD -0.039 Tw [(Again, the developed countries and their supporters saw political r)28(eform as a)]TJ -2.171 -1.291 TD -0.023 Tw [(solution to what they r)14(egar)22(ded as the pr)8(oblem and Pr)23(esident Mugabe r)20(epr)12(esented)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.021 Tc 0.125 Tw [(the pr)18(oblem. They hoped that T)79(svangirai would defeat Mugabe in the 2002)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.011 Tw [(pr)13(esidential election and when this failed to materialise they declar)19(ed the election)]TJ /F13 1 Tf 17.68 54 TD -0.002 Tw [(T)107(able 2)]TJ -6.72 -1.28 TD 0 Tw (Results of the Senate Elections)Tj 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 565.63 Tm [(Province)-11958(Zanu-PF)-7058(MDC)-7858(T)106(otal)]TJ ET 0 0 0 1 K 10 M /GS3 gs 42.46 557.83 m 419.5 557.83 l 42.46 539.95 m 419.5 539.95 l S BT /F9 1 Tf 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 545.35 Tm /GS2 gs -0.002 Tw [(Bulawayo Metr)13(o)-10373(0)-10111(5)-9451(5)]TJ ET /GS3 gs 42.46 523.87 m 419.5 523.87 l S BT 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 529.27 Tm /GS2 gs -0.001 Tw [(Harar)12(e Metr)24(o)-11735(5)-10111(0)-9451(5)]TJ ET /GS3 gs 42.46 507.79 m 419.5 507.79 l S BT 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 513.19 Tm /GS2 gs [(Manicaland)-12495(5)-10111(0)-9451(5)]TJ ET /GS3 gs 42.46 491.83 m 419.5 491.83 l S BT 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 497.23 Tm /GS2 gs 0.001 Tw [(Mashonaland Central)-8144(5)-10111(0)-9451(5)]TJ ET /GS3 gs 42.46 475.75 m 419.5 475.75 l S BT 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 481.15 Tm /GS2 gs [(Mashonaland East)-9565(5)-10111(0)-9451(5)]TJ ET /GS3 gs 42.46 459.67 m 419.5 459.67 l S BT 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 465.07 Tm /GS2 gs 0 Tw [(Mashonaland W)85(est)-9283(5)-10111(0)-9451(5)]TJ ET /GS3 gs 42.46 443.59 m 419.5 443.59 l S BT 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 448.99 Tm /GS2 gs [(Masvingo)-13331(5)-10111(0)-9451(5)]TJ ET /GS3 gs 42.46 427.63 m 419.5 427.63 l S BT 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 433.03 Tm /GS2 gs 0.002 Tw [(Matebeleland South)-8869(5)-10111(0)-9451(5)]TJ ET /GS3 gs 42.46 411.55 m 419.5 411.55 l S BT 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 416.95 Tm /GS2 gs -0.002 Tw [(Matebeleland North)-8775(3)-10111(2)-9451(5)]TJ ET /GS3 gs 42.46 395.47 m 419.5 395.47 l S BT 8.55 0 0 9.5 50.98 400.87 Tm /GS2 gs [(Midlands)-13483(5)-10111(0)-9451(5)]TJ /F13 1 Tf 0 -1.693 TD 0.001 Tc [(T)107(otal)-14949(43)-10115(7)-8945(5)1(0)]TJ /F9 1 Tf 8 0 0 8 42.46 362.35 Tm 0 Tc 0 Tw [(Sour)14(ce: Zimbabwe Election Commission)]TJ ET 1000 M /GS3 gs 42.74 580.86 376.57 -201.07 re S 10 M 334.78 581.11 m 334.78 379.51 l 245.26 581.11 m 245.26 380.11 l 157.9 580.63 m 157.9 379.51 l S endstream endobj 47 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R /F11 6 0 R /F13 21 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 49 0 obj << /Length 5324 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 422.88 642.07 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs 0.001 Tc (135)Tj -36.048 -0.132 TD (V)Tj 7 0 0 7 69.6 640.75 Tm 0 Tc (OLUME)Tj 10 0 0 10 95.64 640.75 Tm 0 Tw ( 4 N)Tj 7 0 0 7 116.52 640.75 Tm (O)Tj 10 0 0 10 122.04 640.75 Tm ( 2)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 62.4 637.99 m 437.88 637.99 l S BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 62.4 606.07 Tm /GS2 gs 0.055 Tw [(not to be fr)19(ee and fair and the Zimbabwean government to be illegitimate. They)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.034 Tc 0.125 Tw [(embarked upon various pr)23(ogrammes of action to isolate the Zimbabwean)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc (government.)Tj 2.16 -1.28 TD -0.035 Tw [(Mugabe is r)23(egar)22(ded by his opponents as authoritarian, corr)7(upt and a dictator)]TJ -2.16 -1.291 TD -0.02 Tw [(who has been stealing elections since the MDC posed a challenge to his r)19(ule in the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.01 Tc -0.062 Tw [(2000 elections. He is seen as a thr)22(eat to the socio-political and economic development)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.046 Tw [(and pr)25(ogr)11(ess not only of his country and the Southern )39(African r)14(egion, but of the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.009 Tc -0.063 Tw [(whole )41(African continent as well as of )41(Africa\325s initiatives such as the New Partnership)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.047 Tw [(for )39(Africa\325s Development. Leaders of developed countries have exerted pr)19(essur)28(e)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.016 Tw [(on the leaders of Southern )45(African countries to join them in condemning Mugabe,)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.044 Tw [(demanding that South )41(Africa play a leading r)27(ole in acting against Mugabe because)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.034 Tw [(of what they r)26(egar)22(d as his violations of human rights $Rotber)11(g 2004, p 9$. One of)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.115 Tw [(the issues central to this view is the pr)20(ofound failur)22(e to view the Zimbabwean)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.001 Tw (situation beyond Mugabe.)Tj 2.16 -1.291 TD 0 Tw [(The MDC\325s position is that the r)16(esponsibility to exert pr)23(essur)16(e on Mugabe to)]TJ -2.16 -1.28 TD 0.005 Tw [(step down lies with the leaders of )43(African countries, a position that is maintained)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.014 Tw [(by its supporters both within and outside Zimbabwe. It is inter)28(esting to note that)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.002 Tc -0.063 Tw [(the opposition party does not maintain that this r)29(esponsibility lies also with leaders)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.059 Tw [(of developed countries. This r)23(eality supports those who believe that this is a means)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.009 Tc -0.063 Tw [(by leaders of developed countries to use )44(African countries, particularly South )34(Africa,)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.02 Tw [(to play a leading r)27(ole in achieving their objective in Zimbabwe and has bolster)17(ed)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.005 Tw [(the contention of the r)17(uling party that the MDC is a tool of the imperialist powers)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw ($Phimister & Raftopoulous 2004, pp 385-400$.)Tj 2.16 -1.28 TD -0.003 Tc -0.062 Tw [(Pointing out that Pr)16(esidents Thabo Mbeki of South )46(Africa, Olusegun Obasanjo)]TJ -2.16 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.075 Tw (of Nigeria and Bakili Muluzi of Malawi \324failed to persuade Mugabe\325 when they)Tj 0 -1.28 TD -0.012 Tw [(\324visited\325 him on 5 May 2004 in Harar)24(e to \324say whether)73(, or when, he intends to step)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD (down\325, )Tj /F11 1 Tf 3.44 0 TD 0.099 Tw (Africa Confidential)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.874 0 TD [( $2003, p 3$ concludes that this \324puts the r)17(esponsibility)]TJ -11.314 -1.28 TD 0 Tw [(back wher)22(e it belongs, with Zimbabwe\325s own leaders\325.)]TJ 2.16 -1.291 TD 0.03 Tw [(The MDC\325s belief that the r)20(esponsibility to exert pr)21(essur)16(e upon Mugabe lies)]TJ -2.16 -1.28 TD -0.004 Tc -0.062 Tw [(with the leaders of )43(African countries, not with the people of Zimbabwe, is defended)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.008 Tc 0.125 Tw [(by T)94(svangirai. )36(After the ef)26(forts of Pr)16(esidents Mbeki and Obasanjo to pr)13(omote)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.063 Tw [(dialogue between the r)9(uling party and the MDC, he pointed out $)]TJ /F11 1 Tf 28.194 0 TD (Africa Confidential)Tj /F9 1 Tf -28.194 -1.291 TD -0.001 Tc (2003, p 3$ that their attempts to \324legitimise Mugabe\325 enabled Mugabe to consolidate)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (his power and position.)Tj 2.16 -1.291 TD 0.026 Tw [(W)97(eizmann Hamilton maintains that the MDC \324gave Mugabe\325 and the r)10(uling)]TJ -2.16 -1.28 TD 0.006 Tc 0.125 Tw (party political \324space to consolidate\325 their \324position\325. The fact that the MDC is)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.089 Tw (supported by \324big business and white farmers at home and imperialism and its)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0.002 Tc 0.125 Tw (institutions\325 has \324undermined its support among the masses in Zimbabwe and)Tj 0 -1.291 TD [(thr)21(oughout Southern )43(Africa\325. Its support fr)16(om white farmers \324who continue to)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.017 Tw [(oppr)29(ess and exploit farm labour)12(ers\325 has helped to undermine its r)14(ural support. It)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.024 Tc 0.125 Tw [(has r)29(efrained fr)17(om mobilising mass action against the government and has)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.035 Tw [(concentrated on appealing to external for)26(ces to exert pr)12(essur)16(e upon Mugabe and)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.001 Tc 0.125 Tw [(the r)16(uling party)109(. This has enabled Mugabe to maintain that the survival of his)]TJ ET endstream endobj 50 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R /F11 6 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 52 0 obj << /Length 5493 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 292.66 642.19 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs (J)Tj 7 0 0 7 295.9 642.19 Tm (OURNAL)Tj 10 0 0 10 327.1 642.19 Tm ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 329.5 642.19 Tm (OF)Tj 10 0 0 10 338.86 642.19 Tm -0.046 Tc 0 Tw ( A)Tj 7 0 0 7 348.7 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (FRICAN)Tj 10 0 0 10 375.82 642.19 Tm -0.009 Tc ( E)Tj 7 0 0 7 384.46 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (LECTIONS)Tj 10 0 0 10 41.02 642.07 Tm 0.001 Tc (136)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 41.62 637.99 m 419.5 637.99 l S BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 42.46 606.07 Tm /GS2 gs 0.011 Tc 0.125 Tw [(administration is a struggle against external interfer)15(ence in defence of \324white)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.043 Tc [(minority business and farming inter)12(ests\325 and to pr)14(esent the MDC as the)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw [(or)15(ganisational agent of imperialism $Hamilton 2002, p 2$.)]TJ 2.171 -1.28 TD -0.003 Tc -0.063 Tw [(The \324r)24(eal thr)19(eat\325 to Mugabe and his party is \324the desperate state of the economy)]TJ -2.171 -1.291 TD -0.012 Tc -0.062 Tw [(and its ef)8(fects on Zimbabwe\325s long-suf)27(fering people\325 $Hamilton 2002, p 2$. \324Economic)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.013 Tw [(failur)13(e confr)22(onts Mugabe mor)8(e sharply than opposition parties and for)24(eign critics)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.022 Tw [(and the \324government\325s main foe is the shrinking economy)104(, an everyday r)20(eminder)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.009 Tc 0.125 Tw (of mismanagement and corruption which makes most Zimbabweans long for)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.03 Tw [(political change \320 even those who could never vote for Mor)13(gan T)94(svangirai and the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.002 Tw [(MDC, damned by British Prime Minister T)84(ony Blair)-71(\325s claim to be working closely)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw (with it\325 $)Tj /F11 1 Tf 3.771 0 TD (Africa Confidential)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.76 0 TD ( 2004b, p 3$.)Tj -9.36 -1.28 TD 0.012 Tw [(T)99(svangirai, on the other hand, sees his strategy $articulated to Joseph W)52(inter)]TJ -2.171 -1.291 TD 0.09 Tw (of the BBC$ as \324to wait while Mr Mugabe mismanaged the economy to such an)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0.047 Tw [(extent that he was for)9(ced out of of)23(fice\325. This \324long-term, passive view has, so far)80(,)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.011 Tc 0.125 Tw [(steer)8(ed the country away fr)28(om civil war)66(, but has not seriously perturbed the)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.001 Tw [(authorities\325 $W)53(inter 2003, p 2$.)]TJ 2.171 -1.291 TD -0.002 Tc -0.062 Tw (The MDC\325s strategy of unseating Mugabe does not do justice to its \324immediate)Tj -2.171 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.022 Tw [(objective\325 which \324has been to dislodge Zanu-PF fr)17(om power)-73(\325 $Sachikonye 2002, p)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.027 Tw [(17$ \320 it would be quite possible for Mugabe to be r)10(emoved fr)19(om power while his)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.086 Tw [(party r)12(emains on. Mugabe should not be confused with the r)8(uling party)112(, which)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw [(might still overwhelmingly win fr)9(ee and fair elections under a new leader)81(.)]TJ 13 0 0 13 129.1 303.07 Tm (S)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 135.94 303.07 Tm (TRUCTURAL)Tj 13 0 0 13 192.58 303.07 Tm -0.006 Tc ( W)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 208.66 303.07 Tm 0 Tc (EAKNESSES)Tj 13 0 0 13 260.98 303.07 Tm ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 264.1 303.07 Tm (OF)Tj 13 0 0 13 276.34 303.07 Tm ( )Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 279.46 303.07 Tm (THE)Tj 13 0 0 13 298.18 303.07 Tm -0.006 Tw [( MDC)]TJ 10.5 0 0 10.5 42.46 282.55 Tm 0.036 Tw [(The MDC has not addr)13(essed itself seriously and ef)11(fectively to the issue of power)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.006 Tw [(r)18(elations in Zimbabwe and the fundamental need to change them in favour of the)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.058 Tw [(inter)16(ests of the vast majority of the people of the country)101(. It has not seriously)121(, in)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.081 Tw [(theory or in practice, r)9(ecognised the importance of or)23(ganising or mobilising the)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.024 Tw [(people to achieve political, economic and ideological hegemony as a pr)18(er)17(equisite)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.056 Tw [(not only for r)11(emoval fr)25(om political power of those contr)8(olling the state, but also for)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw [(establishing an alternative socio-political and economic or)17(der)68(.)]TJ 2.171 -1.28 TD 0.04 Tw [(For these key r)25(easons the MDC has not seriously and ef)9(fectively challenged)]TJ -2.171 -1.291 TD 0.028 Tw [(the ruling party in its str)14(uggle to \324legitimately exer)6(cise power and authority over)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.055 Tw [(the contr)19(ol and management of the country\325s af)10(fairs in the inter)13(est of the people)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.027 Tc 0.125 Tw [(and in accor)13(dance with the principles of justice, equity)111(, accountability and)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw [(transpar)9(ency\325 $Moyo 1997, p 61$.)]TJ 2.171 -1.291 TD -0.037 Tw (It is on the strategic issue of the fundamental need for political, economic and)Tj -2.171 -1.28 TD 0.074 Tw [(ideological or)8(ganisation for transformation of power r)22(elations in the inter)25(ests of)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.008 Tw [(the masses of the people that the content of policies and the pr)14(ogramme of action)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tw [(of the pr)14(ogr)23(essive opposition party ar)11(e tested $Cher)8(u 2000, p 128$.)]TJ 2.171 -1.291 TD 0.028 Tw (The MDC should fundamentally transform itself to serve as the social agent)Tj -2.171 -1.28 TD 0.082 Tw (for change in Zimbabwe. It should no longer personalise the socio-political and)Tj 0 -1.291 TD -0.002 Tc -0.063 Tw [(economic pr)16(oblems or continue to r)21(egar)14(d Pr)18(esident Robert Mugabe as the pr)13(oblem.)]TJ ET endstream endobj 53 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R /F11 6 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 55 0 obj << /Length 5159 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 422.88 642.07 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs 0.001 Tc (137)Tj -36.048 -0.132 TD (V)Tj 7 0 0 7 69.6 640.75 Tm 0 Tc (OLUME)Tj 10 0 0 10 95.64 640.75 Tm 0 Tw ( 4 N)Tj 7 0 0 7 116.52 640.75 Tm (O)Tj 10 0 0 10 122.04 640.75 Tm ( 2)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 62.4 637.99 m 437.88 637.99 l S BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 62.4 606.07 Tm /GS2 gs 0.026 Tw [(The cases of Malawi, Zambia and some other )47(African countries have pr)14(oved that)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.004 Tc -0.063 Tw [(the r)18(emoval of the leader of the r)10(uling party fr)23(om power is not, in itself, the solution)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw [(to socio-political and economic pr)25(oblems.)]TJ 2.16 -1.28 TD 0.034 Tc 0.125 Tw [(The MDC has focused mor)24(e and mor)19(e on personalities, elections, the)]TJ -2.16 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.05 Tw [(Constitution and Parliament and less and less on the form and content, r)24(ole and)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.033 Tw [(futur)20(e of the state in the democratisation str)9(uggle. )38(At issue is the fundamental and)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.005 Tc 0.125 Tw [(str)18(uctural need for it to pr)10(ovide r)20(easons why the state should be transformed)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.022 Tw [(fundamentally so as to dir)20(ect and underwrite the achievement and consolidation)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tw [(of the pr)25(ocess of meaningful socio-political and economic change.)]TJ 2.16 -1.28 TD -0.002 Tc -0.063 Tw [(Central to this need is cr)23(edible policies pr)22(oviding options to those of the ruling)]TJ -2.16 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0.004 Tw [(party and of international or)27(ganisations such as the International Monetary Fund)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.033 Tw [(and the W)91(orld Bank. It must develop pr)24(ogrammes of action capable of r)16(esponding)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.003 Tw (to the socio-political and economic challenges in Zimbabwe. It should also have a)Tj 0 -1.28 TD -0.001 Tc -0.063 Tw [(concr)28(ete understanding of socio-political and economic developments and debates)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.003 Tc -0.062 Tw [(in other countries, particularly those in the Southern )42(African r)19(egion and the )38(African)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.05 Tw [(continent and view them pr)27(ogr)11(essively within the context of a pan-African agenda)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.001 Tw [(for r)21(esolving )40(Africa\325s pr)14(oblems.)]TJ 13 0 0 13 218.04 357.07 Tm (C)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 227.28 357.07 Tm (ONCLUSION)Tj 10.5 0 0 10.5 62.4 336.55 Tm 0.011 Tw [(The paper has analysed the theor)21(etical and practical weaknesses of the MDC and)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.007 Tw (the fact that it has not waged a decisive war against these weaknesses in its quest)Tj 0 -1.291 TD -0.012 Tc -0.062 Tw [(for state political power)77(. These two key issues wer)21(e used to analyse the socio-political)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.017 Tw [(situation in Zimbabwe in 2004, which indicated that the r)15(uling party was going to)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.019 Tw [(win the 2005 elections; the opposition party\325s thr)22(eat to boycott the 2005 elections;)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.006 Tc 0.125 Tw [(its \324Mugabe must go\325 strategy and its failur)27(e to understand and r)9(ecognise the)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.016 Tc [(importance of internal factors over external in the r)19(esolution of Zimbabwe\325s)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc [(pr)25(oblems.)]TJ 2.16 -1.291 TD -0.039 Tw [(The MDC has not substantiated in practice its leader)-71(\325s position, articulated in)]TJ -2.16 -1.28 TD -0.034 Tw (an interview with Netsai Mlilo, that the \324solution\325 to Zimbabwe\325s \324national crisis is)Tj 0 -1.291 TD -0.002 Tc -0.063 Tw [(not just elections\325, that it is \324about the traditional mechanism of r)23(esolving the power)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD [(contestations and str)11(uctur)28(e of power beyond the elections\325, that \324r)14(emoving Mugabe)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.008 Tw [(without transforming the institutional base is not going to solve the pr)26(oblem\325 and)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.042 Tw [(that MDC leaders \324know it is not just a change of personality that is r)28(equir)20(ed. It is a)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.007 Tw [(deeper transformation of the political cultur)28(e in the country\325 $T)89(svangirai, in Mlilo)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.007 Tc -0.062 Tw (2004, p 9$. Mlilo had pointed out that the MDC had failed to rally or mobilise people;)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.007 Tw [(that it was widely r)23(egar)22(ded as an urban-based party which seemed unable to win)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.052 Tw [(support in the r)15(ural ar)14(eas; that it did not appear to have \324the smartest advisers\325 and)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.006 Tc -0.062 Tw [(that its leaders did not seem able to \324shr)12(ug of)25(f)-62(\325)0( their \324tag as T)95(ony Blair)-82(\325s messengers\325.)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.051 Tw (Answering the question \324Other than opposing Mugabe, does the MDC have policy)Tj 0 -1.291 TD 0.033 Tw [(on land and the economy?\325, T)93(svangirai pointed out that its \324solution lies with\325 its)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.014 Tw [(\324policy pr)22(ogramme called Restart, which is a r)17(econstr)7(uction pr)24(ogramme to ensur)23(e)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.08 Tw [(that ther)18(e is suf)26(ficient confidence in r)12(ehabilitating industry)110(, tourism, the mining)]TJ ET endstream endobj 56 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 58 0 obj << /Length 5178 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 292.66 642.19 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs (J)Tj 7 0 0 7 295.9 642.19 Tm (OURNAL)Tj 10 0 0 10 327.1 642.19 Tm ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 329.5 642.19 Tm (OF)Tj 10 0 0 10 338.86 642.19 Tm -0.046 Tc 0 Tw ( A)Tj 7 0 0 7 348.7 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (FRICAN)Tj 10 0 0 10 375.82 642.19 Tm -0.009 Tc ( E)Tj 7 0 0 7 384.46 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (LECTIONS)Tj 10 0 0 10 41.02 642.07 Tm 0.001 Tc (138)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 41.62 637.99 m 419.5 637.99 l S BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 42.46 606.07 Tm /GS2 gs 0 Tc 0.074 Tw [(sector)65(, manufacturing of basic goods, including food\325 $T)98(svangirai, in Mlilo 2004,)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.001 Tw (p 9$.)Tj 2.171 -1.291 TD 0 Tw [(The MDC, by concentrating its ef)22(forts on parliamentary opposition tactics or)]TJ -2.171 -1.28 TD 0.027 Tc 0.125 Tw [(electoral, legalistic strategy in its struggle for power)71(, is over)14(estimating the)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.013 Tc [(importance of elections. While elections ar)12(e important to the achievement or)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.056 Tw [(consolidation of democracy)103(, democracy is not simply the electoral victory over one)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.02 Tw [(party by another or about holding periodic fr)16(ee and fair elections. Democracy as a)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.041 Tc 0.125 Tw [(pr)16(oject is the str)10(uggle either to achieve or to consolidate socio-economic)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw [(development in the inter)11(ests of the masses of the people.)]TJ 2.171 -1.28 TD -0.04 Tw [(Eghosa E. Osaghae $2004, pp 1-2$ articulates the or)17(ganic r)30(elationship between)]TJ -2.171 -1.291 TD -0.063 Tw [(democracy and socio-economic development. The democratic pr)16(oject is \324about and)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.055 Tw [(for citizens who have stakes in and expect dividends fr)13(om it\325. The masses of the)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.039 Tc 0.125 Tw (people, who queue for long hours to vote or who take part in \324riots and)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.053 Tw [(demonstrations\325 to defeat oppr)14(essive governments, and those who lead and join)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.08 Tw [(pr)13(ogr)23(essive social movements and political parties expect \324immediate and long-)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.001 Tw (term dividends\325.)Tj 2.171 -1.291 TD -0.001 Tc -0.063 Tw [(The MDC has not r)18(ecognised, in theory or in practice, the strategic importance)]TJ -2.171 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.048 Tw [(of mobilising for political, economic and ideological hegemony as a pr)7(er)28(equisite to)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD [(the seizur)18(e and exer)10(cise of political power thr)22(ough elections and the establishment)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.049 Tw [(of an alternative socio-political and economic or)16(der)68(. )35(As a r)20(esult it is in danger of)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.04 Tw [(being r)15(educed to the practice of exerting pr)12(essur)28(e upon the state of Zimbabwe and)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0.045 Tw [(other Southern )31(African countries for policy changes and victories which will not)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.105 Tw [(be suf)16(ficient for it either to achieve political power or to consolidate or expand)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tw (these changes and victories.)Tj 13 0 0 13 164.86 262.63 Tm (\320\320\320\320\320 R)Tj 9.1 0 0 9.1 209.26 262.63 Tm (EFERENCES)Tj 13 0 0 13 261.46 262.63 Tm ( \320\320\320\320\320)Tj /F11 1 Tf 10.5 0 0 10.5 42.46 242.11 Tm (Africa Confidential)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.771 0 TD [( 42$2$. 2001. \324Zimbabwe: the r)15(oad to r)7(uin\325, 12 October)73(.)]TJ -7.771 -1.291 TD [(\320\320\320\320\320)-209(43$1)62(1$. 2002. \324Zimbabwe: Hungry for change\325, 16 May)103(.)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD [(\320\320\320\320\320)-209(44$10$. 2003. \324Zimbabwe: Who is next?\325, 16 May)111(.)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD [(\320\320\320\320\320)-209(45$8$. 2004a. \324Zimbabwe: Losing Zengeza\325, 16 )38(April.)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD [(\320\320\320\320\320)-209(45$15$. 2004b. \324Zimbabwe: On and on and on\325, 23 July)117(.)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD [(\320\320\320\320\320)-209(46$6$. 2005. \324Zimbabwe: Matebeleland moves on\325, 18 Mar)24(ch.)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.004 Tw [(Andr)11(easson, S. 2003. \324Economic Reform and \322V)56(irtual Democracy\323 in South )45(Africa)]TJ 2.697 -1.291 TD 0.037 Tc 0.125 Tw (and Zimbabwe: The Incompatibility of Liberalisation, Inclusion and)Tj 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc (Development\325. )Tj /F11 1 Tf 6.789 0 TD 0 Tw (Journal of Contemporary African Studies)Tj /F9 1 Tf 16.629 0 TD [( 21$3$, September)71(.)]TJ -26.114 -1.291 TD 0.003 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Bayart, J. 2000. \324Africa in the W)85(orld: )38(A)61( History of Extraversion\325. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 29.657 0 TD (African Affairs)Tj /F9 1 Tf -26.96 -1.28 TD 0 Tc (395$99$.)Tj -2.697 -1.291 TD 0.014 Tw [(Bond, P)131(.)0( 2001. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 6.366 0 TD [(Against Global Apartheid: South Africa Meets the W)13(orld Bank, IMF and)]TJ -3.669 -1.28 TD 0 Tw (International Finance)Tj /F9 1 Tf 8.777 0 TD [(. Cape T)98(own: University of Cape T)93(own Pr)11(ess.)]TJ -11.474 -1.291 TD 0.026 Tc 0.125 Tw [(\320\320\320\320\320. 2002. \324Zimbabwe, South )29(Africa, and the Power Politics of Bour)27(geois)]TJ 2.697 -1.28 TD 0.037 Tc (Democracy\325. )Tj /F11 1 Tf 6.377 0 TD (Monthly Review)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.394 0 TD [(, May)105(. http://www)96(.monthlyr)16(eview)92(.or)23(g/)]TJ -13.771 -1.291 TD 0 Tc (0502bond.htm.)Tj ET endstream endobj 59 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R /F11 6 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 61 0 obj << /Length 5748 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 422.88 642.07 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs 0.001 Tc (139)Tj -36.048 -0.132 TD (V)Tj 7 0 0 7 69.6 640.75 Tm 0 Tc (OLUME)Tj 10 0 0 10 95.64 640.75 Tm 0 Tw ( 4 N)Tj 7 0 0 7 116.52 640.75 Tm (O)Tj 10 0 0 10 122.04 640.75 Tm ( 2)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 62.4 637.99 m 437.88 637.99 l S BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 62.4 606.07 Tm /GS2 gs 0.026 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Bratton, M. 2005. \324Reply to a Critic: Don\325t Shoot the Messenger)-74(\325. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 31.566 0 TD (Journal of)Tj -28.88 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (Contemporary African Studies)Tj /F9 1 Tf 12.411 0 TD [( 23$1$, January)111(.)]TJ -15.097 -1.291 TD -0.056 Tw [(Cher)16(u, F)95(.)0( 2000. \324The Local Dimensions of Global Reform\325. In J N Pieterse $ed$ )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 33.28 0 TD (Global)Tj -30.583 -1.28 TD 0 Tw [(Futur)25(es: Shaping Globalization)]TJ /F9 1 Tf 12.64 0 TD (. London: Zed Books.)Tj -15.337 -1.291 TD 0.042 Tw [(Cr)18(oss, E. 2000. Quoted in Peter )41(Alexander)71(, \324Zimbabwean W)91(orkers, the MDC and)]TJ 2.686 -1.28 TD 0 Tw (the 2000 Election\325. )Tj /F11 1 Tf 8.24 0 TD (Review of African Political Economy)Tj /F9 1 Tf 14.834 0 TD ( 85.)Tj -25.76 -1.291 TD -0.008 Tc -0.062 Tw [(\320\320\320\320\320 2001. Quoted in Patrick Bond, \324Radical Rhetoric and the W)97(orking Class during)]TJ 2.686 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0.082 Tw (Zimbabwean Nationalism\325s Dying Days\325. )Tj /F11 1 Tf 18.88 0 TD [(Journal of W)15(orld System Resear)25(ch)]TJ /F9 1 Tf 14.091 0 TD (.)Tj -32.971 -1.291 TD 0 Tw (7$1$, Spring.)Tj -2.686 -1.28 TD 0.045 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Danser)27(eau, S. 2003. \324Liberation and Opposition in Zimbabwe\325. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 31.406 0 TD (Journal of)Tj -28.72 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (Contemporary African Studies)Tj /F9 1 Tf 12.411 0 TD [( 21$2$, May)107(.)]TJ -15.097 -1.28 TD -0.006 Tc -0.063 Tw [(\320\320\320\320\320.2005. \324Between a Rock and a Har)29(d Place: Zimbabwe\325s Development Impasse\325.)]TJ 2.686 -1.291 TD -0.001 Tc (In Henning Melber $ed$. )Tj /F11 1 Tf 10.697 0 TD (Zimbabwe \320 The Political Economy of Decline)Tj /F9 1 Tf 18.149 0 TD (. Uppsala:)Tj -28.846 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.038 Tw [(Nor)12(diska Afrikainstitutet.)]TJ -2.686 -1.291 TD 0.113 Tw (Dashwood, H S. 1996. \324The Relevance of Class to the Evolution of Zimbabwe\325s)Tj 2.686 -1.28 TD 0.076 Tw [(Development Strategy)109(, 1980-1991\325. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 15.657 0 TD (Journal of Southern African Studies)Tj /F9 1 Tf 14.823 0 TD [( 22$1$,)]TJ -30.48 -1.291 TD [(Mar)13(ch.)]TJ -2.686 -1.28 TD 0.02 Tw [(Dawes, N. 2005. \324Zimbabwe: )44(African National Congr)14(ess concerns mount\325. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 32.914 0 TD (Mail &)Tj -30.229 -1.291 TD (Guardian)Tj /F9 1 Tf 3.897 0 TD 0 Tw [( $Johannesbur)25(g$, 18 to 23 Mar)17(ch.)]TJ -6.583 -1.28 TD -0.009 Tc -0.062 Tw [(Dowden, R. 2005. Quoted in M Gwisai. 2005. Interviewed in )46(Alternative Information)]TJ 2.686 -1.291 TD -0.006 Tc -0.063 Tw [(and Development Centr)18(e. \324Zimbabwe after the 2005 Parliamentary Elections\325.)]TJ /F11 1 Tf 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc (Alternatives)Tj /F9 1 Tf 5.006 0 TD 0 Tw [( 3$14$, )36(April-May)108(.)]TJ -7.691 -1.291 TD -0.063 Tw [(Gwisai, M. 2005. Interviewed in )34(Alternative Information and Development Centr)24(e.)]TJ 2.686 -1.28 TD -0.017 Tw (\324Zimbabwe after the 2005 Parliamentary Elections\325. )Tj /F11 1 Tf 22.686 0 TD (Alternatives)Tj /F9 1 Tf 4.994 0 TD [( 3$14$, )36(April-)]TJ -27.68 -1.291 TD 0.001 Tc [(May)107(.)]TJ -2.686 -1.28 TD -0.005 Tc -0.063 Tw [(Hamilton, W)99(.)0( 2000. \324Mugabe\325s \322Marxism\323, Zimbabwe\325s \322Red 1990s\323: The Character)]TJ 2.686 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.037 Tw (of the Opposition\325. )Tj /F11 1 Tf 8.434 0 TD [(Socialism T)116(oday)]TJ /F9 1 Tf 6.446 0 TD (: the monthly journal of the Socialist Party)Tj -14.88 -1.28 TD 0.002 Tw [(47, May)109(.)]TJ -2.686 -1.291 TD -0.056 Tw (\320\320\320\320\320.2002. \324Cling to Power in Zimbabwe\325. )Tj /F11 1 Tf 18.754 0 TD [(Socialism T)107(oday)]TJ /F9 1 Tf 6.434 0 TD (: )Tj /F11 1 Tf 0.446 0 TD (the monthly journal of the)Tj -22.949 -1.28 TD -0.001 Tw (Socialist Party)Tj /F9 1 Tf 5.943 0 TD [( 63, Mar)24(ch.)]TJ -8.629 -1.291 TD -0.034 Tw (Hendricks, C and E Mandala. 2002. \324Beggars Can\325t Be Choosers: Reflections on the)Tj 2.686 -1.28 TD 0 Tw [(Zimbabwe Quagmir)19(e\325. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 10.263 0 TD [(CODESRIA)38( Bulletin )]TJ /F9 1 Tf 8.857 0 TD (1 and 2.)Tj -21.806 -1.291 TD -0.01 Tw [(Hughes, T)76(.)0( 2005. \324Plotting the decline of a tyrant\325. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 21.874 0 TD (Business Day)Tj /F9 1 Tf 5.52 0 TD [( $Johannesbur)26(g$, 25)]TJ -24.709 -1.28 TD (April.)Tj -2.686 -1.291 TD -0.006 Tc -0.062 Tw [(Ihonvber)27(e, J O. 1997. \324On the Thr)10(eshold of )38(Another False Start? )40(A)52( Critical Evaluation)]TJ 2.686 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.033 Tw [(of Pr)15(o-Democracy Movements in )36(Africa\325. In E Ike Udogo $ed$ )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 26.971 0 TD (Democracy and)Tj -26.971 -1.291 TD -0.011 Tw [(Democratization in Africa: T)103(oward the 21st Century)]TJ /F9 1 Tf 21.109 0 TD (. Leiden: E J Brill.)Tj -23.794 -1.28 TD -0.013 Tc -0.062 Tw [(International Crisis Gr)26(oup. 2005. \324Post-Election Zimbabwe: What Next?\325 )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 30.629 0 TD (Africa Report)Tj /F9 1 Tf -27.943 -1.291 TD 0 Tc -0.035 Tw [(93, 7 June. This r)9(eport is available on the International Crisis Gr)16(oup website:)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD [(http://www)85(.crisisgr)18(oup.or)27(g)]TJ -2.686 -1.291 TD 0.002 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Kagor)25(o, B. 2003. \324The Opposition and Civil Society\325. In Richar)16(d Cornwell $ed$.)]TJ /F11 1 Tf 2.686 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.024 Tw [(Zimbabwe\325)47(s T)118(urmoil: Pr)16(oblems and Pr)13(ospects )]TJ /F9 1 Tf 18.48 0 TD [( 87. Pr)16(etoria: Institute for Security)]TJ -18.48 -1.291 TD 0.002 Tw [(Studies, September)70(.)]TJ ET endstream endobj 62 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R /F11 6 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 64 0 obj << /Length 5812 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 292.66 642.19 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs (J)Tj 7 0 0 7 295.9 642.19 Tm (OURNAL)Tj 10 0 0 10 327.1 642.19 Tm ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 329.5 642.19 Tm (OF)Tj 10 0 0 10 338.86 642.19 Tm -0.046 Tc 0 Tw ( A)Tj 7 0 0 7 348.7 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (FRICAN)Tj 10 0 0 10 375.82 642.19 Tm -0.009 Tc ( E)Tj 7 0 0 7 384.46 642.19 Tm 0 Tc (LECTIONS)Tj 10 0 0 10 41.02 642.07 Tm 0.001 Tc (140)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 41.62 637.99 m 419.5 637.99 l S BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 42.46 606.07 Tm /GS2 gs -0.006 Tc -0.063 Tw (Kanhema, N. 2003. \324Who is going to succeed Mugabe?\325. )Tj /F11 1 Tf 23.817 0 TD [(Sunday T)56(imes)]TJ /F9 1 Tf 5.611 0 TD [( $South )40(Africa$,)]TJ -26.731 -1.28 TD 0.001 Tc 0.001 Tw [(1)55(1)1( May)103(.)]TJ -2.697 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw [(Kanyenze, G. 2005. Quoted in Charles Rukuni, \324T)80(svangirai still all the MDC has)]TJ 2.697 -1.28 TD (got\325. )Tj /F11 1 Tf 2.206 0 TD (Financial Gazette)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.109 0 TD [( $Harar)17(e$, 31 May allafrica.com. \324Zimbabwe:)]TJ -9.314 -1.291 TD [(T)87(savangirai still all the MDC has got\325 and )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 18.56 0 TD (The Insider)Tj /F9 1 Tf 4.583 0 TD [( $Harar)17(e$, May)114(. http:/)]TJ -23.143 -1.28 TD [(/www)91(.insiderzim.com/may05tsvangirai.html.)]TJ -2.697 -1.291 TD -0.021 Tw [(Madhku, L. 2005. Interviewed in Rapule T)80(abane, \324Flawed system must go\325. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 32.971 0 TD (Mail &)Tj -30.274 -1.28 TD (Guardian)Tj /F9 1 Tf 3.897 0 TD 0.001 Tw [( $Johannesbur)26(g$ 8 to 14 )35(April.)]TJ -6.594 -1.291 TD 0.013 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Mkapa, B. 2005. Quoted in Jonathan Katzenellenbogen, \324T)84(anzania\325s pr)26(esident)]TJ 2.697 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (defends Mugabe\325. )Tj /F11 1 Tf 8.183 0 TD (Business Day)Tj /F9 1 Tf 5.531 0 TD [( $Johannesbur)13(g$, 3 June.)]TJ -16.411 -1.291 TD -0.015 Tw (Movement for Democratic Change. 2004. )Tj /F11 1 Tf 18.251 0 TD (Restart: Our Path to Social Justice)Tj /F9 1 Tf 13.84 0 TD [(. Harar)10(e:)]TJ -29.394 -1.28 TD 0 Tw [(Movement for Democratic Change, January)101(.)]TJ -2.697 -1.291 TD 0.072 Tw [(Moyo, J. 2005. Quoted in Charles Rukuni, \324T)82(svangirai still all the MDC has got\325.)]TJ /F11 1 Tf 2.697 -1.28 TD -0.002 Tc -0.063 Tw (Financial Gazette)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.006 0 TD [( $Harar)19(e$, 31 May)109(. $allafrica.com: \324Zimbabwe: T)88(svangirai Still)]TJ -7.006 -1.291 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (All the MDC Has Got\325$.)Tj -2.697 -1.28 TD -0.002 Tc -0.063 Tw [(Moyo, S. 1997. \324Policy Dialogue, Impr)13(oved Governance, and the New Partnerships:)]TJ 2.697 -1.291 TD -0.004 Tc [(Experiences fr)20(om Southern )30(Africa\325. In Hennock Kifle, )36(Adebayo Olukushi and)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.029 Tw [(Lennart W)90(ohlgemuth $eds$. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 12.331 0 TD [(A)36( New Partnership for African Development: Issues)]TJ -12.331 -1.291 TD -0.001 Tw (and Parameters)Tj /F9 1 Tf 6.309 0 TD [(. Stockholm: Nor)18(diska )37(Afrikainstitutet.)]TJ -9.006 -1.28 TD 0.066 Tw (\320\320\320\320\320.2000. Quoted in Kondwani Chirambo and Hugh McCullum, \324Zimbabwe\325s)Tj 2.697 -1.291 TD -0.004 Tw [(land issue mor)17(e than mer)20(e electioneering\325. 20 June. http://www)90(.sar)15(dc.net/)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD (sd/elections2000/zimbabwe/zim-land.html.)Tj -2.697 -1.291 TD -0.011 Tc -0.063 Tw [(Ncube, T)75(.)0( 2005. \324Only Mugabe can save Zimbabwe\325. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 22.057 0 TD (Mail & Guardian)Tj /F9 1 Tf 6.811 0 TD [( $Johannesbur)19(g$,)]TJ -26.171 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.001 Tw [(18 to 23 Mar)21(ch.)]TJ -2.697 -1.291 TD -0.011 Tc -0.063 Tw [(Ncube, W)88(.)0( 2004. Quoted in )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 11.451 0 TD (Africa Confidential)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.497 0 TD [( 45$18$, \324Zimbabwe 1)65(1: Losing Zengeza\325,)]TJ -16.251 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.039 Tw (16 April.)Tj -2.697 -1.291 TD -0.002 Tc -0.062 Tw [(\320\320\320\320\320.2004. Quoted in Godwin Gandu, \324South )40(Africa back on Zimbabwe beat\325. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 33.977 0 TD (Mail)Tj -31.28 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (& Guardian)Tj /F9 1 Tf 4.926 0 TD [( $Johannesbur)25(g$, 29 to 30 September)76(.)]TJ -7.623 -1.291 TD -0.002 Tc -0.062 Tw (Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S J. 2003. \324Dynamics of the Zimbabwe Crisis in the 21st Century\325.)Tj /F11 1 Tf 2.697 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (African Journal on Conflict Resolution)Tj /F9 1 Tf 15.646 0 TD ( 3$1$.)Tj -18.343 -1.291 TD 0.122 Tw [(Nzimande, B. 2003. Interviewed by International Corr)12(espondence, 15 Febr)15(uary)100(.)]TJ 2.697 -1.28 TD [(http://www)85(.ospaal.or)29(g/corint/numer)14(o-5/eng-6/af-sud.htm.)]TJ -2.697 -1.291 TD 0.009 Tw [(Osaghae. E E. 2004. \324Making Democracy W)85(ork in )42(Africa: Fr)18(om the Institutional to)]TJ 2.697 -1.28 TD 0 Tw (the Substantive\325. )Tj /F11 1 Tf 7.589 0 TD (Journal of African Elections)Tj /F9 1 Tf 11.234 0 TD ( 3$1$, June.)Tj -21.52 -1.291 TD 0.125 Tw [(Phimister)69(, I and B Raftopoulos. 2004. \324Mugabe, Mbeki and the Politics of )42(Anti-)]TJ 2.697 -1.28 TD (Imperialism\325. )Tj /F11 1 Tf 6.16 0 TD 0 Tw (Review of African Political Economy)Tj /F9 1 Tf 14.823 0 TD ( 101.)Tj -23.68 -1.291 TD 0.001 Tc 0.125 Tw [(Rotber)15(g, R. 2004. \324Dictatorship and Decay: Only Mbeki can r)22(escue Zimbabwe\325.)]TJ /F11 1 Tf 2.697 -1.28 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (Business Day)Tj /F9 1 Tf 5.531 0 TD [( $Johannesbur)14(g$, 8 December)77(.)]TJ -8.229 -1.291 TD -0.004 Tc -0.062 Tw [(Sachikonye, L)36( M. 2000-2001. \324The )14(Y)92(ear of Zimbabwe\325s political watershed\325. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 32.217 0 TD (Southern)Tj -29.52 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.001 Tw (Africa Political & Economic Monthly)Tj /F9 1 Tf 15.131 0 TD [( 14$3$, December/January)116(.)]TJ -17.829 -1.291 TD -0.006 Tc -0.063 Tw [(\320\320\320\320\320.2002. \324Whither Zimbabwe? Crisis and Zimbabwe\325s T)84(ragedy\325. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 28.903 0 TD (Review of African)Tj -26.206 -1.28 TD 0 Tc -0.001 Tw (Political Economy)Tj /F9 1 Tf 7.337 0 TD [( 29$91$, Mar)10(ch.)]TJ ET endstream endobj 65 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R /F11 6 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 67 0 obj << /Length 2610 >> stream BT /F9 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 422.88 642.07 Tm 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs 0.001 Tc (141)Tj -36.048 -0.132 TD (V)Tj 7 0 0 7 69.6 640.75 Tm 0 Tc (OLUME)Tj 10 0 0 10 95.64 640.75 Tm 0 Tw ( 4 N)Tj 7 0 0 7 116.52 640.75 Tm (O)Tj 10 0 0 10 122.04 640.75 Tm ( 2)Tj ET 0 0 0 1 K 0 J 0 j 0.48 w 10 M []0 d /GS3 gs 1 i 62.4 637.99 m 437.88 637.99 l S BT 10.5 0 0 10.5 62.4 606.07 Tm /GS2 gs -0.016 Tc 0.095 Tw (Thompson, C. 2000. \324Zimbabwe: Intersection of Human Rights, Land Reform, and)Tj 2.686 -1.28 TD 0.112 Tw (Regional Security\325. )Tj /F11 1 Tf 8.469 0 TD [(For)15(eign Policy in Focus)]TJ /F9 1 Tf 9.52 0 TD [(, November)86(. http://www)82(.fpif.or)25(g/)]TJ -17.989 -1.291 TD [(commentary/zimbabwe-body)106(.html.)]TJ -2.686 -1.28 TD 0 Tw (\320\320\320\320\320. 2003. \324Globalizing Land and Food in Zimbabwe: Implications for Southern)Tj 2.686 -1.291 TD (Africa\325. )Tj /F11 1 Tf 3.371 0 TD -0.014 Tw (African Studies Quarterly)Tj /F9 1 Tf 10.194 0 TD (. 7$2 and 3$: [Online] http://)Tj -13.566 -1.28 TD (web.africa.ufl.edu.asp/v7/v7i2a10.htm.)Tj -2.686 -1.291 TD 0.085 Tw [(T)94(svangirai, M. 2004. Quoted in Jonathan Katzenellenbogen and Dumisani Muleya,)]TJ 2.686 -1.28 TD 0.02 Tc 0.125 Tw [(\324T)84(svangirai changes tune on Mbeki\325s \322quiet diplomacy\323\325. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 27.349 0 TD (Business Day)Tj /F9 1 Tf -27.349 -1.291 TD -0.016 Tc 0.001 Tw [($Johannesbur)17(g$, 29 October)71(.)]TJ -2.686 -1.28 TD 0.051 Tw [(\320\320\320\320\320. 2004. Quoted in Netsai Mlilo, \324T)90(svangirai\325s push for )46(Africa\325. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 28.914 0 TD (Mail & Guardian)Tj /F9 1 Tf -26.229 -1.291 TD 0 Tw [($Johannesbur)17(g$, 29 October to 4 November)71(.)]TJ -2.686 -1.28 TD -0.014 Tw [(W)58(inter)73(, J. 2003. \324The main political parties in Zimbabwe: Zimbabwe )39(African National)]TJ 2.686 -1.291 TD -0.027 Tc -0.063 Tw [(Union \320 Patriotic Fr)9(ont and Movement for Democratic Change\325. )]TJ /F11 1 Tf 26.217 0 TD (BBC News Online)Tj /F9 1 Tf -26.217 -1.28 TD -0.016 Tc 0.075 Tw [(http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/africa/1870283.stm, 6 June. For this sour)17(ce)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD -0.007 Tc 0.125 Tw [(of information, see also, http://www)93(.sokwanele.com/articles/homepage/)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD -0.016 Tc (mainpoliticalparties.htm.)Tj -2.686 -1.291 TD 0 Tw (Zimbabwe Election Support Network. 2005. \324The SADC Election Principles and)Tj 2.686 -1.28 TD [(Guidelines, and Zimbabwe\325s New Electoral Legislation \320 )33(An Evaluation\325,)]TJ 0 -1.291 TD 0.002 Tw [(January)100(. http://www)98(.kubatana.net/htm/ar)20(chive/elec)]TJ 0 -1.28 TD [(050128zesm.asp?sector)11(-ELEC&range-start-301-31.)]TJ ET endstream endobj 68 0 obj << /ProcSet [/PDF /Text ] /Font << /F9 5 0 R /F11 6 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS2 7 0 R /GS3 8 0 R >> >> endobj 69 0 obj << /Type /Halftone /HalftoneType 1 /Frequency 60 /Angle 45 /SpotFunction /Round >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /SA false /OP true /BG /Identity /UCR /Identity /HT 69 0 R >> endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /SA false /OP false /BG /Identity /UCR /Identity /HT 69 0 R >> endobj 11 0 obj << /FunctionType 0 /Domain [0 1] /Range [0 1] /BitsPerSample 8 /Size [256] /Length 271 /Filter /FlateDecode >> stream H��~}|{zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcba`_^]\[ZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA@?>=<;:9876543210/.-,+*)('&%$#"! {;� endstream endobj 70 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 733 /CapHeight 692 /Descent -281 /Flags 34 /FontBBox [-166 -283 1021 927] /FontName /Palatino-Roman /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 84 /XHeight 469 /FontFile3 71 0 R >> endobj 71 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 50566 /Subtype /Type1C >> stream H�\UyX�~��Q �uQ0��- ��M8�� Uɩ�"��ИV#�V��Q�D�5&�O��JP�� ٙ��}��}��cAD��x��%,�R��Nj\��>��]��z݂�畕�W��3��W��Z/��@b& �H��`@>D8P� Ta��hE;y� �PK�)��h.eP6��d�%��*��j��H��q:E��j��!F��1��L3��D3s�yL.�3fFd�̻L%S�lf�0ۙ]�^�s�9Μd�2��-��`��g��W�1��56��e3�7X[�:�R�]��na�=�A�8�{��6��N�8Η��.��ąsQ\��rF�r��\=��p��V~�`,Z��vA=$i�h5:�J�2��Q0��K��]�L��Z�"ި�NO.� ZT��l��6nV��M�)d��*�f�*(p�f��(�x��-ŕY��4z�-EE�/Eӹx��r,f�,,R�5��f�D��&)��%�U�K3�j��u��h �H0�f��DS�W�T5�I3�� ѳ��9�ˤ'�ڧkcPe�*Giu��E�b�(��/Tva��.:�=7Q^(ʢ�$]��Bl6��S�=�-^��PHTt�n�M�y�]�%��pa�;�͡ܨ]�ȱjб�C�L�X��Lv��u�2i�`wX�8�6��bIe��E�t�K�⦝�SoI,��&��tqfTR�e�,S��t��j��n"V��|�޺��;��oW(�R*�f!^��p��t�Q�6K+ϡ��S=��:T��&��[ߝ��n��s+�] ;z�f��bVG��@�;��-�ťn1Ai�@y�pS�j�%=6H%��M��,U��J� Q#2z|hsz,K��Mg��\}*�49�v{�"��~��n��M��u��6��*pa�h��xF�s+<�C��h財��J��K��x/C��蛈��1��p��N��;��#��`�=z��2C��@+�bX4��/��9Q��^�D�\��_6aT5F�b�u�nǘ��c�0�am�aܧx�(Ư�#&�`r8&�b�yL}�iu/��U��%��DT��}��ǘ݈�Bė"! ��N$�F�$G �R�!�E�kH�i#�V��F��!� �4 +Y՘��x=�_CN rZ�;��-Gn+�<�7yeȻ��ߋ��_��Z��|&��_C0Ch��-4@|�� B:�G��@`�x,΁5 �H��v�<8�ci��CI9J�QZ��M9��Ǌ+X�e�f޺�w��NދĪ��@y2*��*��%T��TT�cÇ�x5,6��歨m��Q��!�cK=><�?M��l3�

URL: https://www.eisa.org/pdf/JAE4.2Makgetlaneng.pdf

⇱