![]() |
VOOZH | about |
Given n, find the greatest number which is strictly not more than n and whose binary representation consists of m consecutive ones, then m-1 consecutive zeros and nothing else
Examples:
Input : n = 7
Output : 6
Explanation: 6's binary representation is 110,
and 7's is 111, so 6 consists of 2 consecutive
1's and then 1 consecutive 0.
Input : 130
Output : 120
Explanation: 28 and 120 are the only numbers <=120,
28 is 11100 consists of 3 consecutive 1's and then
2 consecutive 0's. 120 is 1111000 consists of 4
consecutive 1's and then 3 consecutive 0's. So 120
is the greatest of number<=120 which meets the
given condition.
A naive approach will be to traverse from 1 to N and check for every binary representation which consists of m consecutive 1's and m-1 consecutive 0's and store the largest of them which meets the given condition.
An efficient approach is to observe a pattern of numbers,
[1(1), 6(110), 28(11100), 120(1111000), 496(111110000), ....]
To get the formula for the numbers which satisfies the conditions we take 120 as an example-
120 is represented as 1111000 which has m = 4 1's and m = 3 0's. Converting 1111000 to decimal we get:
2^3+2^4+2^5+2^6 which can be represented as (2^m-1 + 2^m+ 2^m+1 + ... 2^m+2, 2^2*m)
2^3*(1+2+2^2+2^3) which can be represented as (2^(m-1)*(1+2+2^2+2^3+..2^(m-1))
2^3*(2^4-1) which can be represented as [2^(m-1) * (2^m -1)].
So all the numbers that meet the given condition can be represented as
[2^(m-1) * (2^m -1)]
We can iterate till the number does not exceeds N and print the largest of all possible elements. A closer observation will shows that at m = 33 it will exceed the 10^18 mark , so we are calculating the number in unit's time as log(32) is near to constant which is required in calculating the pow .
So, the overall complexity will be O(1).
6
Time Complexity: O(1)
Auxiliary Space: O(1)
Efficient approach:
This problem can be solved with at most two comparisons, by using the following logic:
1. For a number with n bits, the answer with m set bits followed by m - 1 bits can have a total of n bits, ie, m = (n + 1)/2 (as m + m - 1 = n).
2. The result can then be computed as 2 (m + m - 1) - 2 (m - 1).
3. However, if the n - bit number is in the range [2 (m + m - 2), 2 (m + m - 1) - 2 (m - 1) - 1], then m must be adjusted to m - 1.
Below is the implementation of the above approach:
6
Time Complexity: O(1)
Auxiliary Space: O(1)