VOOZH about

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/2016-feb-6way

⇱ How Ubuntu 16.04 Is Performing Compared To Five Other Linux Distributions Review - Phoronix


👁 Phoronix

How Ubuntu 16.04 Is Performing Compared To Five Other Linux Distributions

Written by Michael Larabel in Operating Systems on 24 February 2016 at 10:00 AM EST. Page 1 of 7. 14 Comments.

As it's been a month since our last large Linux distribution comparison (a 10-way Linux distribution battle), here are some fresh benchmarks of six Linux distributions to see how their out-of-the-box performance compares. From a Core i7 Broadwell system, the updated versions of Clear Linux, Fedora 23, CentOS 7, openSUSE 42.1, Ubuntu 15.10, and Ubuntu 16.04 LTS were compared.

👁 Image

The distribution comparison this month took place on an Intel Core i7 5775C (Broadwell) system with Iris Graphics. The same system with i7-5775C, MSI Z97-G45 GAMING motherboard, 16GB of RAM, and 120GB Crucial SSD were tested when doing clean installations of each of these six Linux distributions.

👁 Image

Everything was tested out-of-the-box as usual. (For new readers, the CPU frequency was maintained the same throughout; with the system graph the clock speed difference is just different since Clear Linux was using the ACPI CPUFreq scaling governor on Clear Linux while the others were using P-State. The P-State governor reports the turbo speed via sysfs while CPUFreq reports the base clock frequency.)

To simplify some of the prominent differences between these six Linux operating systems:

- Intel's Clear Linux 6430 distribution used the Linux 4.4.2 kernel, GCC 5.2.0 compiler, and used an EXT4 file-system by default. Clear Linux was the only distribution defaulting to the CPUFreq performance governor rather than P-State. Clear Linux was one of the major winners of the last comparison as it's a server-oriented distribution by Intel that prides itself upon high performance with taking some rather aggressive defaults and other optimizations.

- Fedora 23 is currently up to the Linux 4.3.5 kernel, GCC 5.3.1 compiler, and an EXT4 file-system by default. For graphics tests there is Mesa 11.1.0.

- CentOS 7 uses the Linux 3.10 kernel, GCC 4.8.5, Mesa 10.6.5, and defaults to an XFS file-system.

- OpenSUSE 42.1 Leap has the Linux 4.1 kernel, GCC 4.8.5, and its home directory is an XFS file-system from where the benchmarks were conducted. Mesa 11.0.8 is available on OpenSUSE 42.1. OpenSUSE along with Ubuntu were the distributions in this comparison defaulting to the deadline I/O scheduler while the others were using CFQ by default.

- Ubuntu 15.10 has the Linux 4.2 kernel, GCC 5.2.1, and Mesa 11.0.2. Ubuntu uses EXT4 by default.

- Ubuntu 16.04 in its current development state has the Linux 4.4 kernel, GCC 5.3.1 compiler, EXT4 file-system, and Mesa 11.1.2.

👁 Image

All of these Linux distribution benchmarks were carried out in a fully-automated and reproducible manner using the open-source Phoronix Test Suite benchmarking software.