AVX-512's Enormous Advantage For AMD EPYC 4005 Series Performance

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 25 June 2025 at 03:00 PM EDT. Page 6 of 9. 44 Comments.

👁 OSPRay Studio benchmark with settings of Camera: 1, Resolution: 1080p, Samples Per Pixel: 1, Renderer: Path Tracer, Acceleration: CPU. EPYC 4585PX was the fastest.

👁 OSPRay Studio benchmark with settings of Camera: 1, Resolution: 1080p, Samples Per Pixel: 16, Renderer: Path Tracer, Acceleration: CPU. EPYC 4585PX was the fastest.

👁 OSPRay Studio benchmark with settings of Camera: 2, Resolution: 1080p, Samples Per Pixel: 1, Renderer: Path Tracer, Acceleration: CPU. EPYC 4585PX was the fastest.

👁 OSPRay Studio benchmark with settings of Camera: 3, Resolution: 1080p, Samples Per Pixel: 1, Renderer: Path Tracer, Acceleration: CPU. EPYC 4585PX was the fastest.

In other creator workloads like Open Image Denoise, Embree ray-tracing, and the OSPRay Studio application there were clear and very healthy benefits out of AVX-512 with the EPYC 4005 series. Even without AVX-512, the EPYC 4005 series was delivering better performance than the Xeon 6369P while AVX-512 with Zen 5 just cemented a dominating victory.

44 Comments - Next Page

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next Page

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-epyc-4005-avx512/6

⇱ AVX-512's Enormous Advantage For AMD EPYC 4005 Series Performance Review - Phoronix

AVX-512's Enormous Advantage For AMD EPYC 4005 Series Performance