AMD EPYC 9754 Benchmarks For The 128-Core Bergamo

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 19 July 2023 at 09:00 AM EDT. Page 8 of 9. 31 Comments.

👁 OpenSSL benchmark with settings of Algorithm: RSA4096. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.

👁 OpenSSL benchmark with settings of Algorithm: RSA4096. EPYC 9754 2P was the fastest.

👁 OpenSSL benchmark with settings of Algorithm: SHA256. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.

👁 OpenSSL benchmark with settings of Algorithm: SHA512. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.

👁 OpenSSL benchmark with settings of Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.

The AMD EPYC 9754 was also performing very well for more conventional workloads like OpenSSL.

👁 Xmrig benchmark with settings of Variant: Wownero, Hash Count: 1M. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.

Xmrig mining was also great with Bergamo.

👁 RocksDB benchmark with settings of Test: Read While Writing. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.

👁 Sysbench benchmark with settings of Test: CPU. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.

Overall I was very pleased with the performance provided by the 128-core EPYC 9754 server processors and extremely pleased by the power efficiency advantages over Genoa(X) and managing to widen the lead even further compared to Sapphire Rapids in many workloads.

31 Comments - Next Page

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next Page

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-epyc-9754-bergamo/8

⇱ AMD EPYC 9754 Benchmarks For The 128-Core Bergamo Review - Phoronix

AMD EPYC 9754 Benchmarks For The 128-Core Bergamo