VOOZH about

URL: https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-epyc-pstate-efficiency/5

⇱ Benchmarks: Excellent Power Efficiency With 5th Gen AMD EPYC Using amd-pstate & Power Profiles - Phoronix


👁 Phoronix

Benchmarks: Excellent Power Efficiency With 5th Gen AMD EPYC Using amd-pstate & Power Profiles

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 21 February 2025 at 03:00 PM EST. Page 5 of 5. 1 Comment.

When taking the geometric mean of the raw performance across 50+ different workloads, the modern default on Linux 6.13+ of AMD P-State performance was about 2% faster overall than the prior default of ACPI CPUFreq. A little bit of uplift at large and not at all bad considering all of the original AMD EPYC 9005 series benchmarking was done with the ACPI CPUFreq driver. When tuning for efficiency with the Balanced Memory Power Profile and powersave governor with EPP performance bias, there was still 97.8% the performance of the new default configuration.

The energy efficiency tuning with achieving 97.8% the performance of the AMD P-State performance default becomes very interesting when looking at the combined AMD EPYC 9755 CPU power consumption. That tuned configuration led to the EPYC 9755 2P power consumption at 92% the power of AMD P-State or 87.8% the power consumption on average of the ACPI CPUFreq performance default. That equates to a very nice improvement in EPYC Turin efficiency without losing much on the raw performance side.

The CPU power reduction also equated to slightly lower CPU core temperatures.

Lastly is a look at the peak CPU clock frequency observed during the entire duration of the testing.

For those wanting to maximize the efficiency of AMD EPYC 9005 series servers, the Balanced Memory Power Profile is quite interesting when paired with the new AMD P-State driver default. It's certainly worth exploring and evaluating for your particular workloads if really concerned about achieving the peak performance-per-Watt without sacrificing performance. The results of ACPI CPUFreq vs. AMD P-State drivers also continues to look very good for those running an up-to-date kernel in production. Further benchmarks looking at these tunables on more AMD EPYC 9005 series hardware will be coming up in future articles on Phoronix.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.